Don't you mean he's a far better talker than fighter?PredatorHayds wrote:He's got POWER.
Great fight. Far better fighter than talker that's for sure.
Really devastating knockout.
What about Ed 'too tall' Jones?Syntax Error wrote:Don't you mean he's a far better talker than fighter?PredatorHayds wrote:He's got POWER.
Great fight. Far better fighter than talker that's for sure.
Really devastating knockout.
He's on OK fighter, but if he could fight as well as he talked, he'd be the top of ALL boxing fan's p4p lists, that's for sure & that includes Wilt Chamberlain too!
Meant it in the context I prefer him a lot more as a fighter than talker.Syntax Error wrote:Don't you mean he's a far better talker than fighter?PredatorHayds wrote:He's got POWER.
Great fight. Far better fighter than talker that's for sure.
Really devastating knockout.
He's on OK fighter, but if he could fight as well as he talked, he'd be the top of ALL boxing fan's p4p lists, that's for sure & that includes Wilt Chamberlain too!
If Drozd gets fit. As champion in recess he'd get first crack.jujigatame wrote:Is Bellew/Breidis next? The cruiserweight division could really heat up if the top guys start consistently fighting each other.
According to the "Normal" operating procedures of the WBC, Bellew will need to defend vs the mandatory next since he is filling a vacant title. As stated above, Drozd if he is ready, Breidis if he is not. Of course, the WBC can ignore any of its rules anytime it wants. That is also in the rulesPredatorHayds wrote:If Drozd gets fit. As champion in recess he'd get first crack.jujigatame wrote:Is Bellew/Breidis next? The cruiserweight division could really heat up if the top guys start consistently fighting each other.
Not sure timeline for Briedis. Probably a year as he's just became silver champion.
3.18 Conditions upon New Champion. The WBC may, as it in its sole discretion deems proper
and necessary, impose conditions upon a new champion filling a vacant title, including but
not limited to: (a) ordering the first defense of the title as a mandatory defense against a
WBC-designated challenger (who may be any Qualified Challenger or a challenger selected
through a final elimination bout or a WBC-recognized tournament. Upon request, the WBC
may in its discretion approve one or more voluntary defenses prior to ordering a mandatory
defense.
Oh yes, him too!jamesmcdonnell wrote:What about Ed 'too tall' Jones?Syntax Error wrote:Don't you mean he's a far better talker than fighter?PredatorHayds wrote:He's got POWER.
Great fight. Far better fighter than talker that's for sure.
Really devastating knockout.
He's on OK fighter, but if he could fight as well as he talked, he'd be the top of ALL boxing fan's p4p lists, that's for sure & that includes Wilt Chamberlain too!
What about Robert Wadlow?Syntax Error wrote:Oh yes, him too!jamesmcdonnell wrote:What about Ed 'too tall' Jones?Syntax Error wrote:
Don't you mean he's a far better talker than fighter?
He's on OK fighter, but if he could fight as well as he talked, he'd be the top of ALL boxing fan's p4p lists, that's for sure & that includes Wilt Chamberlain too!