Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

http://boxrec.com/boxer/9357

Struggling to comprehend how even the WBO can sanction a defence for Terry against someone who looks so far below world title level.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by crusader »

I didn't realize that Fana is still active
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by lefty »

The listing isn't showing up for me
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

It's formally announced on Twitter. A former two time world title challenger is true enough but it was a long time ago. He lost to Dean Pithie in 1999 ! Cheap defence and disappointing.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by bigjack »

Shocking :witzend:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I blame David Haye (who has replaced George Groves)
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by olij999 »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:It's formally announced on Twitter. A former two time world title challenger is true enough but it was a long time ago. He lost to Dean Pithie in 1999 ! Cheap defence and disappointing.
Hey, let's not undersell this one. Fana may be 42, but he is a former two-time IBF super-feather champion. The fact that that was last in 2010 is a minor detail. It would be picky to point out that, since his comeback started in 2012, he has lost fights for the WBO International, the WBA Inter-continental, the WBA Pan-African and African Boxing Union lightweight titles. More relevant are his wins for the WBF International and the South African titles, but what seals the deal for me is that he also holds the Interim WBO Africa lightweight title. So there is plainly nothing wrong with someone in his fifth decade fighting for a world title.

And as Fana also has a number of other prestigious belts from his super-feather days, I hope he brings all of them into the ring in Paul Butler style - if so, either the ring will collapse under the weight of plastic, pleather and cheap metal, or Flanagan will do a double-take and think he is a branch of Timpsons.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23111
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by handsofstone »

crusader wrote:I didn't realize that Fana is still active
You spelled "alive" wrong :TU:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23111
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by handsofstone »

olij999 wrote:
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:It's formally announced on Twitter. A former two time world title challenger is true enough but it was a long time ago. He lost to Dean Pithie in 1999 ! Cheap defence and disappointing.
Hey, let's not undersell this one. Fana may be 42, but he is a former two-time IBF super-feather champion. The fact that that was last in 2010 is a minor detail. It would be picky to point out that, since his comeback started in 2012, he has lost fights for the WBO International, the WBA Inter-continental, the WBA Pan-African and African Boxing Union lightweight titles. More relevant are his wins for the WBF International and the South African titles, but what seals the deal for me is that he also holds the Interim WBO Africa lightweight title. So there is plainly nothing wrong with someone in his fifth decade fighting for a world title.

And as Fana also has a number of other prestigious belts from his super-feather days, I hope he brings all of them into the ring in Paul Butler style - if so, either the ring will collapse under the weight of plastic, pleather and cheap metal, or Flanagan will do a double-take and think he is a branch of Timpsons.
:lol: :salut:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by crusader »

handsofstone wrote:
crusader wrote:I didn't realize that Fana is still active
You spelled "alive" wrong :TU:
:OhYes:
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by wesshaw1985 »

frank should put on a uk vs. S.Africa card

Tete vs. Butler
Mchunu vs. Ovill/Enzo
Van Heerden vs. Skeete
Munyai vs. Mithchell Smith/Walsh
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3329
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Disfuckingraceful opponent
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4094
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by black panther »

I clearly remember Fana getting blasted in two by Barrera who was in the twilight of his career. That was eleven years ago :o
kaiserbill
Cruiserweight
Posts: 355
Joined: 29 Jun 2011, 18:11

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by kaiserbill »

As I said in the other thread:

"As said, Fana is a relatively light punching lightweight 4 months away from his 43rd birthday. :-?
He is competent, but his best years are way behind him. He started his pro career all the way back in 1994, and won the South African Super Featherweight title all the way back in 1999.
He was very decent back in the day, but we are talking 10 to 15 years ago as his heyday."
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by PredatorHayds »

I'm expecting a few competition winning e-mails with free tickets for this one.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by keithmoonhangover »

handsofstone wrote:
crusader wrote:I didn't realize that Fana is still active
You spelled "alive" wrong :TU:
:lol: :clap:
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by chiggsy »

They're teak tough from that part of the world though aren't they....
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by magwitch »

I was at Terry Flanagan’s fight with Nate Campbell 3 years ago. I couldn’t understand how terrible Campbell looked that night. He was no spring chicken but had just landed the big time yet he did next to nothing.
Manchester Hitman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Cack opponent however this is not a FW show - it's fat Mick Hennessys and I doubt he has provided much of a budget for the undercard ad all the money would be going to Tyson and Wlad. Yes frank probably picked the opponent but it could have been knocked back by fat mick, Steve Wood or even Flanagan himself. Fans maybe 43 but he's probably still better then a lot of the fighters in the WBO top 15- it is however poor from all concerned.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8592
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by coneye »

It Just smells of a lack of confidence in his boxer from the promoter /manager ,,,,and a lack of pride from the boxer ... Sort of the way British boxing has been going the last few years ,, Actually come to think about it , the way its been going all over the world in the last few years
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by magwitch »

coneye wrote:It Just smells of a lack of confidence in his boxer from the promoter /manager ,,,,and a lack of pride from the boxer ... Sort of the way British boxing has been going the last few years ,, Actually come to think about it , the way its been going all over the world in the last few years
I don't really agree with that statement. There's plenty of UK boxers that do not duck and do not lack pride - from amateur to beginner through to pros. I don't see a lot of shows on TV these days but dodgy match-ups there's been plenty....but plenty of heart as well.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1795
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by tigermoth87 »

Piss poor defence.

It's not like Flanagan is shit either. He's a cracking fighter who could probably beat anyone else in the division but he's fighting this clown.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by mullenman »

I have seen it on other forums that ticket sales for this card is very slow. ...


If klit v fury was a matchroom card they would sell it out in minutes
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23111
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by handsofstone »

mullenman wrote:I have seen it on other forums that ticket sales for this card is very slow. ...


If klit v fury was a matchroom card they would sell it out in minutes
But Eddie's card would be "stacked"
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Flanagan fighting a 42 year old next

Post by MightyWarrior »

Ridiculous defence for warren's so called "best lightweight in the world" :doh:

Terry must be embarrassed with this shambles, his opponent may be coming to the ring with a walking stick.

Obviously FW desperate to avoid the nightmare scenario of his man losing on someone else's show, but stooping to this level also shows he doesn't rate him as highly as he makes out.
Post Reply