Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by BoxBuzz »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Honestly? An "Idiot" rates around 30-40(max) on the french IQ scale. Pretty sure that person would not be carrying around something as mentally sophisticated as "an opinion" in his/her matrix.
So an Idiot would not likely be inclined to be suckered into such a errant viewpoint. Neither would an imbecile in my opinion.

Now a Moron.....that's another thing. Quite possible in that case.
In the UK. If you have an IQ of below 70, you are classed as having a Learning Disability.

Same in the U.S. the old terms that were used in asylums were the three I just mentioned, each with a numerical standard of IQ. Comedians got a hold of the language, and the judgement that goes with it, and embarrassed the system into finding kinder ways of expressing this information. Those terms are now simply insults, but once were the words to express the benchmarks. Honestly intelligence is way over rated. Hatred is found in far more people of highest IQ than of the lowest. A kind heart beats a smart ass every time.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16892
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BoxBuzz wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Honestly? An "Idiot" rates around 30-40(max) on the french IQ scale. Pretty sure that person would not be carrying around something as mentally sophisticated as "an opinion" in his/her matrix.
So an Idiot would not likely be inclined to be suckered into such a errant viewpoint. Neither would an imbecile in my opinion.

Now a Moron.....that's another thing. Quite possible in that case.
In the UK. If you have an IQ of below 70, you are classed as having a Learning Disability.

Same in the U.S. the old terms that were used in asylums were the three I just mentioned, each with a numerical standard of IQ. Comedians got a hold of the language, and the judgement that goes with it, and embarrassed the system into finding kinder ways of expressing this information. Those terms are now simply insults, but once were the words to express the benchmarks. Honestly intelligence is way over rated. Hatred is found in far more people of highest IQ than of the lowest. A kind heart beats a smart ass every time.
Amen to that last bit.

I used to work very closely with people who have Learning Disabilities and profound Mental Health issues. Here's the thing I found more degrading than anything. A group of people with Learning Disabilities got together to decide what terminology should be used to describe people with and IQ under 70 and they came up with the term, Leaning Difficulties. Then someone like the health minister (my memory ain't what it was) declared that they should be called people with Learning Disabilities. They are the most persecuted group in history.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Kalan »

gilgamesh wrote:Frazier didn't have good stamina is an opinion only an idiot would have. He was a slow starter often, but he had a hell of an engine once he got going. Watch the 15th round of the FOTC and tell me Frazier had poor stamina.

Tyson would've already mentally folded by that point in the fight. Frazier was still blasting away with full force.

Frazier had his flaws as a fighter like anyone else, but his stamina damn sure wasn't one of 'em. It was one of his greatest strengths.
Okay... This is going to be difficult... How do I get this across to a low IQ guy like Gilgamesh... Frazier actually had LOUSY stamina... If you watched the Super-Stars competition where Frazier trained to go against top athletes in other sports, it took Joe FOREVER to finish the swimming contest in LAST PLACE... and Frazier finished in LAST PLACE in the running competition... In the bicycling competition Frazier took an early lead... then gassed out completely and EVERY other athlete drove past a tired Frazier very quickly.. Frazier finally finished in last LAST PLACE sucking wind like crazy. In the weight lifting competition the pole vaulter easily destroyed Frazier who couldn't press 170 pounds. Unbelievably weak. Mike Tyson, at his best, could easily press 170 pounds with one arm. He would flatten Smokin' Joe as fast as he crushed Marvelous Marvis Frazier.

People who don't know Boxing (like Gilgamesh) are frequently fooled by a boxer's "stamina" because of their poor competition ... Other world class boxers and top trainers AREN'T fooled... For instance...YOU might think James Toney had a lot of endurance because a boxing ring was HIS environment not YOURS!!! ... I could easily see that Toney lacked stamina. If you went on a 5-mile run with him you'd figure it out too. But Toney's stamina issues never surfaced for the average fan until he faced Roy Jones Jr... Frazier's stamina issues never surfaced until he faced George Foreman... NOBODY Frazier fought had the power or strength to bother Frazier before... Foreman was NOT usually in fantastic shape for most of his fights but he was in GREAT condition for Frazier. Foreman forced a pace that Frazier couldn't match and kept the punches coming. Frazier actually turned ass around and tried to RUN AWAY at one point. Frazier had high blood pressure and was suffering from an enlarged heart -- further complicating his stamina issues... Just because you can beat up very small, weak, out-of-shape, unskilled, and horribly conditioned challengers like Terry Daniels and Dave Zyglewitz, doesn't mean you'll be able to hang with a 6'3" X 217 well conditioned and in-shape George Foreman... Get it???
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by gilgamesh »

Frazier getting blasted out in 2 rounds by Foreman doesn't have a damn thing to do with Stamina, and Joe's performance in a swimming or cycling event is irrelevant. He had the Stamina to go 15 rounds in a Boxing match, and still be swinging with knockout power in the 15th round. Therefore he had good Stamina as a fighter which is all that matters since it was his chosen profession. Whether or not he could beat people at Cycling or Swimming has nothing at all to do with his in ring Stamina.

Foreman overpowered him and knocked him out in 2 rounds. Frazier didn't have a chance to get into the fight hardly and he was already beaten. That has nothing to do with Stamina, that's just a guy hammering you with heavy blows and ending the fight before it even really has the chance to get started. That's a comment on Foreman's power, and the defensive gaps that Frazier had that Foreman was able to take advantage of.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24710
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Tony1244 »

Kalan wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:Frazier didn't have good stamina is an opinion only an idiot would have. He was a slow starter often, but he had a hell of an engine once he got going. Watch the 15th round of the FOTC and tell me Frazier had poor stamina.

Tyson would've already mentally folded by that point in the fight. Frazier was still blasting away with full force.

Frazier had his flaws as a fighter like anyone else, but his stamina damn sure wasn't one of 'em. It was one of his greatest strengths.
Okay... This is going to be difficult... How do I get this across to a low IQ guy like Gilgamesh... Frazier actually had LOUSY stamina... If you watched the Super-Stars competition where Frazier trained to go against top athletes in other sports, it took Joe FOREVER to finish the swimming contest in LAST PLACE... and Frazier finished in LAST PLACE in the running competition... In the bicycling competition Frazier took an early lead... then gassed out completely and EVERY other athlete drove past a tired Frazier very quickly.. Frazier finally finished in last LAST PLACE sucking wind like crazy. In the weight lifting competition the pole vaulter easily destroyed Frazier who couldn't press 170 pounds. Unbelievably weak. Mike Tyson, at his best, could easily press 170 pounds with one arm. He would flatten Smokin' Joe as fast as he crushed Marvelous Marvis Frazier.

People who don't know Boxing (like Gilgamesh) are frequently fooled by a boxer's "stamina" because of their poor competition ... Other world class boxers and top trainers AREN'T fooled... For instance...YOU might think James Toney had a lot of endurance because a boxing ring was HIS environment not YOURS!!! ... I could easily see that Toney lacked stamina. If you went on a 5-mile run with him you'd figure it out too. But Toney's stamina issues never surfaced for the average fan until he faced Roy Jones Jr... Frazier's stamina issues never surfaced until he faced George Foreman... NOBODY Frazier fought had the power or strength to bother Frazier before... Foreman was NOT usually in fantastic shape for most of his fights but he was in GREAT condition for Frazier. Foreman forced a pace that Frazier couldn't match and kept the punches coming. Frazier actually turned ass around and tried to RUN AWAY at one point. Frazier had high blood pressure and was suffering from an enlarged heart -- further complicating his stamina issues... Just because you can beat up very small, weak, out-of-shape, unskilled, and horribly conditioned challengers like Terry Daniels and Dave Zyglewitz, doesn't mean you'll be able to hang with a 6'3" X 217 well conditioned and in-shape George Foreman... Get it???

Saying Frazier "had LOUSY stamina," in boxing due to a swimming or bike race is about as relevant as how good of a chess player Frazier is or how he would have done on an American history test; no relevance at all.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Kalan »

gilgamesh wrote:Frazier getting blasted out in 2 rounds by Foreman doesn't have a damn thing to do with Stamina, and Joe's performance in a swimming or cycling event is irrelevant. He had the Stamina to go 15 rounds in a Boxing match, and still be swinging with knockout power in the 15th round. Therefore he had good Stamina as a fighter which is all that matters since it was his chosen profession. Whether or not he could beat people at Cycling or Swimming has nothing at all to do with his in ring Stamina.

Foreman overpowered him and knocked him out in 2 rounds. Frazier didn't have a chance to get into the fight hardly and he was already beaten. That has nothing to do with Stamina, that's just a guy hammering you with heavy blows and ending the fight before it even really has the chance to get started. That's a comment on Foreman's power, and the defensive gaps that Frazier had that Foreman was able to take advantage of.
You guys don't get it and you don't want to see it... If you place DEAD LAST by a VERY WIDE and RIDICULOUS MARGIN in RUNNING, swimming, and cycling races and you're blowing really hard as you finish the race, you have stamina issues. Boxers run every day. They're not supposed to run like snails but most of them do. It doesn't surface until somebody pushes them to a hard pace and then they fall apart in a round or 2. Frazier would get terribly fat between fights when the money started rolling in, but he could absorb a lot of punishment like James Toney - so he could fake it.

Most of the time stamina and weight issues are not apparent because of weak competition. Nobody watches boxers run. Nobody times them, instructs them, makes them do wind sprints, or has qualified strength trainers and cardio-conditioning coaches working with them. You need flexibility and agility instructors, and people to tutor them in plyometrics and speed work. You need a nutritionist. Nowadays guys like Anthony Joshua, Errol Spence, or Gennady Golovkin will blow you away unless you don't get strong, durable, and conditioned, and watch your weight.

If Foreman kept his weight down between fights like he did for his first 38 fights he might have held the title for a very long time. Everyone loves to eat so it's a very widespread problem with Heavyweights. Heavyweights can weigh anything they want. When you go up and down 50 to 75 pounds in weight a few times it start effecting your stamina even when you get the weight off. You're better off staying fat because it's not good for the body. Tyson Fury will find this out. Guy like Buster Douglas, Buster Mathis, Odlanier Solis, Sam Peter, Chris Arreola, Kirk Johnson, who go up as high as 300 pounds or more enough times never lasted that long as contenders.
foxdog1923
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1105
Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by foxdog1923 »

Kalan wrote: Most of the time stamina and weight issues are not apparent because of weak competition. Nobody watches boxers run. Nobody times them, instructs them, makes them do wind sprints, or has qualified strength trainers and cardio-conditioning coaches working with them. You need flexibility and agility instructors, and people to tutor them in plyometrics and speed work. You need a nutritionist. Nowadays guys like Anthony Joshua, Errol Spence, or Gennady Golovkin will blow you away unless you don't get strong, durable, and conditioned, and watch your weight.
Ahhh yes they do! Many low level professional boxers right up to the elite have personal trainers and high performance trainers that watch them run to say the least. I thought I told you not to talk like you know what trainers do for work.

I've already exposed you as a phoney on the Wilt thread where you've been PROVEN wrong on many aspects. Since then, you don't post there anymore lol.

Just stick to what you know and that doesn't include training.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Kalan »

You're an idiot Foxdog... Just the dumbest jerk I've ever seen on any forum. I've trained hundreds of boxers and have seen a lot of trainers in action. I've boxed amateur and pro myself. I'm not going to make this about me. I know conditioning and weight are a huge problem for a lot of heavyweights and many trainers let them slide, because if they've been successful so far they don't think it's a problem -- and especially they don't believe it's THEIR problem.
foxdog1923
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1105
Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by foxdog1923 »

Kalan wrote:You're an idiot Foxdog... Just the dumbest jerk I've ever seen on any forum. I've trained hundreds of boxers and have seen a lot of trainers in action. I've boxed amateur and pro myself. I'm not going to make this about me. I know conditioning and weight are a huge problem for a lot of heavyweights and many trainers let them slide, because if they've been successful so far they don't think it's a problem -- and especially they don't believe it's THEIR problem.
You are NOT a trainer otherwise you would know boxing is not an "easy" sport. The second you say boxing is easy, INSTANTLY you are not a trainer so stop lying.

Also you've been found out and I've PROVEN you wrong on a lot of your theories. You have yet to prove me wrong. You're so full of crap.

GO TO WILT VS ALI THREAD EVERYONE TO SEE HOW STUPID THIS SO CALLED "BOXING TRAINER" REALLY IS. There you can see me and other posters expose this phoney who thinks boxing is easy.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Kalan »

foxdog1923 wrote: GO TO WILT VS ALI THREAD EVERYONE TO SEE HOW STUPID THIS SO CALLED "BOXING TRAINER" REALLY IS. There you can see me and other posters expose this phoney who thinks boxing is easy
My contributions to that thread definitely outshine yours by a million miles.. And You're the liar asswipe... For an elite athlete Boxing is a lot easier to learn than MMA where you need specialized training in Boxing, Wrestling, Jiu Jitsu, and Muay Thai, and it's not unusual for athletes in MMA to train many more hours a day than the average boxer.. Boxing requires 2 hours of gym time because you're only learning one discipline.. You need conditioning and strength training on top of that, but the skill component is far easier to learn than MMA, gymnastics, NBA level basketball, and some other sports.. It's not a snap, but it's relatively easy compared to many other things you can get involved in.
foxdog1923
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1105
Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by foxdog1923 »

Kalan wrote:
foxdog1923 wrote: GO TO WILT VS ALI THREAD EVERYONE TO SEE HOW STUPID THIS SO CALLED "BOXING TRAINER" REALLY IS. There you can see me and other posters expose this phoney who thinks boxing is easy
My contributions to that thread definitely outshine yours by a million miles.. And You're the liar asswipe... For an elite athlete Boxing is a lot easier to learn than MMA where you need specialized training in Boxing, Wrestling, Jiu Jitsu, and Muay Thai, and it's not unusual for athletes in MMA to train many more hours a day than the average boxer.. Boxing requires 2 hours of gym time because you're only learning one discipline.. You need conditioning and strength training on top of that, but the skill component is far easier to learn than MMA, gymnastics, NBA level basketball, and some other sports.. It's not a snap, but it's relatively easy compared to many other things you can get involved in.
What the hell are you on about? I never argued that at all. Provide proof of me arguing that. As usual dodging the subject.
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4888
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by PredatorHayds »

Kalan wrote:You're an idiot Foxdog... Just the dumbest jerk I've ever seen on any forum. I've trained hundreds of boxers and have seen a lot of trainers in action. I've boxed amateur and pro myself. I'm not going to make this about me. I know conditioning and weight are a huge problem for a lot of heavyweights and many trainers let them slide, because if they've been successful so far they don't think it's a problem -- and especially they don't believe it's THEIR problem.
Name any fighters that you've trained?
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Prime Foreman vs Prime Tyson

Post by Kalan »

When I'm ready to reveal my identity I'll name 'em. Right now I'm not.
Post Reply