Round-by-Round: Anthony Joshua vs. Dominic Breazeale
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
God Haye is a dull bastard...
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
First ive heard but i can imagine it will be blamed on his acne drugs or something like thatRexob wrote:Sklar wrote:Sadly the focus tomorrow will be on the alleged drug cheats in Team Fury rather than this fight.
Why whats happened?
-
reggaereggae
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
crusader wrote:Going by their physiques, Joshua's opponents seem to have no problem staying hungry.
On another note, I notice David Haye talked very quickly tonight. And looked rather wild eyed and intense tonight. He talks well though.
-
Stevieb8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Tyson and hughie, high levels of nandrolonehandsofstone wrote:First ive heard but i can imagine it will be blamed on his acne drugs or something like thatRexob wrote:Sklar wrote:Sadly the focus tomorrow will be on the alleged drug cheats in Team Fury rather than this fight.
Why whats happened?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13361
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Stopping with the steroids would soon stop his acne.handsofstone wrote:First ive heard but i can imagine it will be blamed on his acne drugs or something like thatRexob wrote:Sklar wrote:Sadly the focus tomorrow will be on the alleged drug cheats in Team Fury rather than this fight.
Why whats happened?
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Stevieb8006 wrote:Tyson and hughie, high levels of nandrolonehandsofstone wrote:First ive heard but i can imagine it will be blamed on his acne drugs or something like thatRexob wrote:
Why whats happened?
Not really surprised to be honest.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
I wouldn't be surprised by any sportsperson failing a drugs test.Rexob wrote:Not really surprised to be honest.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13111
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
I wonder how many more executions there need to be before Horse deems Joshua 'ready' for Tyson 'two left feet' Fury 
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Joshua just beat a nobody.Riddick Blowe wrote:I wonder how many more executions there need to be before Horse deems Joshua 'ready' for Tyson 'two left feet' Fury
Please, don't act like he proved anything.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
He looked off his nut !!reggaereggae wrote:crusader wrote:Going by their physiques, Joshua's opponents seem to have no problem staying hungry.![]()
![]()
![]()
On another note, I notice David Haye talked very quickly tonight. And looked rather wild eyed and intense tonight. He talks well though.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
AJ is looking the goods to me, but Breazeale and Martin are mediocre, and Whyte is pretty much unproven. It would be nice to see AJ fight a legit top ten opponent who didn't get there because of one fluky result in which the other guy busted his knee. I suspect that AJ would beat up someone like Pulev, but it would be nice for him to prove it so it's not just speculation.Riddick Blowe wrote:I wonder how many more executions there need to be before Horse deems Joshua 'ready' for Tyson 'two left feet' Fury
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Sadly I agree - this goes for all sports.Horse wrote:I wouldn't be surprised by any sportsperson failing a drugs test.Rexob wrote:Not really surprised to be honest.
Even them that don't fail a test will be taking some "supplement" that is performance enhancing but the authorities haven't got round to banning yet (like the Sharapova balls up - she was taking that stuff for 10 years and probably passed loads of tests purely because the drug wasn't on the banned list).
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
What's that about?!Sklar wrote:Sadly the focus tomorrow will be on the alleged drug cheats in Team Fury rather than this fight.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Both Fury's about to be exposed as drug cheats tomorrow apparantlylefty wrote:What's that about?!Sklar wrote:Sadly the focus tomorrow will be on the alleged drug cheats in Team Fury rather than this fight.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Made only more annoying by the fact he clearly thinks he is some kind of funny as fornicate version of Noel Coward or something.Boxing Prospect wrote:God Haye is a dull bastard...
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5429
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Haye was high as a tart's miniskirt
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Haye even tried to get a sly dig in about Breazeale's last opponent being 43 
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
I bottled it and decided to watch- I thought Joshua boxed really well and credit to Breazeale, he showed a lot of heart and grit. Still think Martin is a better 'boxer' of the two but he definietly falls far short of DB in the heart and durability department.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
If Fury has failed a drug test then it's pretty ironic considering he's consistently been calling joshua a steroid fuelled bodybuilder with no boxing skills.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13111
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
I'm probably going to go crazy repeating this so much, but there's a point in shallow divisions where you have to concede that some folks who made it into the top ten barely did much to 'prove' their worth themselves. Yes, Joshua would crush pulev, and Malik Scott , and whoever else has been arbitrarily dumped in there on the basis of a win over someone who was arbitrarily dumped somewhere else vaguely near the top of the division. To me, Joshua has proved he can come back from adversity vs Whyte. And he has power and skills, judged in large part by the eye test. We can be sure he has a decent engine, especially for someone of his muscle mass.crusader wrote:AJ is looking the goods to me, but Breazeale and Martin are mediocre, and Whyte is pretty much unproven. It would be nice to see AJ fight a legit top ten opponent who didn't get there because of one fluky result in which the other guy busted his knee. I suspect that AJ would beat up someone like Pulev, but it would be nice for him to prove it so it's not just speculation.Riddick Blowe wrote:I wonder how many more executions there need to be before Horse deems Joshua 'ready' for Tyson 'two left feet' Fury
As an aside, Is there any doubt whatsoever at this point that Joshua would have walked through all of fury's pre-wlad opponents? And if there is, why exactly?
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
The division is shallow, but despite that I don't think AJ has beaten anyone who is top 10, or perhaps even top 15, ability-wise. I do think he's the goods and will prove it eventually, but I don't believe all these 'executions' prove much and so I think you miss the point when you ask Horse how many more of them he needs to see for his mind to change.
Quality > quantity
Quality > quantity
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
He should fight Ortiz, Takam or Pulev.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Fury's pre-Wlad record was a lot better than Joshua's current record.Riddick Blowe wrote:I'm probably going to go crazy repeating this so much, but there's a point in shallow divisions where you have to concede that some folks who made it into the top ten barely did much to 'prove' their worth themselves. Yes, Joshua would crush pulev, and Malik Scott , and whoever else has been arbitrarily dumped in there on the basis of a win over someone who was arbitrarily dumped somewhere else vaguely near the top of the division. To me, Joshua has proved he can come back from adversity vs Whyte. And he has power and skills, judged in large part by the eye test. We can be sure he has a decent engine, especially for someone of his muscle mass.
As an aside, Is there any doubt whatsoever at this point that Joshua would have walked through all of fury's pre-wlad opponents? And if there is, why exactly?
Joshua is the IBF champion now. He should try fighting someone half decent next, instead of all of these lowly opponents that he keeps finding.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
A world title fight with 33 fights between them?
Smell the paper.
Smell the paper.
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale & undercard. Round by Round.
Breazeale was suppose to be the traditional easy first title defence but he also fought Breazeale to help break into the US market. The best US had to offer was Breazeale and Wilder in regards to record.Horse wrote:Fury's pre-Wlad record was a lot better than Joshua's current record.Riddick Blowe wrote:I'm probably going to go crazy repeating this so much, but there's a point in shallow divisions where you have to concede that some folks who made it into the top ten barely did much to 'prove' their worth themselves. Yes, Joshua would crush pulev, and Malik Scott , and whoever else has been arbitrarily dumped in there on the basis of a win over someone who was arbitrarily dumped somewhere else vaguely near the top of the division. To me, Joshua has proved he can come back from adversity vs Whyte. And he has power and skills, judged in large part by the eye test. We can be sure he has a decent engine, especially for someone of his muscle mass.
As an aside, Is there any doubt whatsoever at this point that Joshua would have walked through all of fury's pre-wlad opponents? And if there is, why exactly?
Joshua is the IBF champion now. He should try fighting someone half decent next, instead of all of these lowly opponents that he keeps finding.