Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
I'd have to say, I was wrong about this fight, I expected Breazeale to go down much more early. Not sure if AJ had a bad day or Breazeale had a good one, or even both of them. But this fight really makes me wonder how good the 43 year old Breazeale fought before still is. That 43 year old even had a carcrash just 2 weeks before the fight and also was badly injured for most of the rounds and still completely destroyed Breazeale. Untill he couldn't continue and needed 40+ stitches afterwards.
Credits to Breazeale!
Credits to Breazeale!
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Hes 30 years old. I never knew he was in a car crash and didnt know he was badly injured for most of the rounds...asdfjkl wrote:I'd have to say, I was wrong about this fight, I expected Breazeale to go down much more early. Not sure if AJ had a bad day or Breazeale had a good one, or even both of them. But this fight really makes me wonder how good the 43 year old Breazeale fought before still is. That 43 year old even had a carcrash just 2 weeks before the fight and also was badly injured for most of the rounds and still completely destroyed Breazeale. Untill he couldn't continue and needed 40+ stitches afterwards.
Credits to Breazeale!
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Just another day at the office for AJ. Next!
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Groves by DEC at +120 was stealing.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Maybe Joshua isn't as good as you think.asdfjkl wrote:I'd have to say, I was wrong about this fight, I expected Breazeale to go down much more early. Not sure if AJ had a bad day or Breazeale had a good one, or even both of them. But this fight really makes me wonder how good the 43 year old Breazeale fought before still is. That 43 year old even had a carcrash just 2 weeks before the fight and also was badly injured for most of the rounds and still completely destroyed Breazeale. Untill he couldn't continue and needed 40+ stitches afterwards.
Credits to Breazeale!
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
He's talking about Amir Mansour. Mansour is good - better than Breazeale, it's a shame he spent his prime years in prison. Breazeale simply beat him through determination and size, but that was never going to be enough against the bigger, younger, faster Joshua.foxdog1923 wrote:Hes 30 years old. I never knew he was in a car crash and didnt know he was badly injured for most of the rounds...asdfjkl wrote:I'd have to say, I was wrong about this fight, I expected Breazeale to go down much more early. Not sure if AJ had a bad day or Breazeale had a good one, or even both of them. But this fight really makes me wonder how good the 43 year old Breazeale fought before still is. That 43 year old even had a carcrash just 2 weeks before the fight and also was badly injured for most of the rounds and still completely destroyed Breazeale. Untill he couldn't continue and needed 40+ stitches afterwards.
Credits to Breazeale!
Joshua didn't have a bad day, in fact, I think this was probably his best performance to date, with the possible exception of the Martin fight, but that was over so quickly it'd hard to judge. Joshua clearly wasn't rushing to finish him early - he really took his time after wobbling him in the second. I feel that Joshua could have stopped him earlier had he pressed for it, but he decided to take his time and get some work in, which was probably a smart choice.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
You watch your mouth .asdfjkl wrote:Mansour did the best a 43 year old 6ft1 220 pounder who's heavely injured could do at the moment he fought Breazeale, somehow the ref didn't flag it of when Breazeale dropped and because of the injury it's enough to keep his 0.foxdog1923 wrote:Listen, you said Whyte is better than Parker because he KOS Parkers past opponents in faster time. That is your belief and Im not arguing that.asdfjkl wrote: I guess you mean that you still can't believe that I think Whyte iis better then Parker. Whyte KOing every same opponent in less time is part of the evidence for that indeed. But don't worry about it, there are more things you don't seem to realise.
Now with Joshua you are saying that he can do it any round he wants too?? What if he KOs Breazeale in after 4 rounds, does that mean Mansour is better than Joshua? Because Mansour wouldve KOd him in faster time wouldnt it? Im just saying what YOU believe in.
Mansour still was obviously better as Breazeale.
Joshua isn't 43, isn't 6ft1 and isn't 220 pound, Joshua is a lot bigger, similar muscled and skilled, a lot more heavy, and a lot younger and next to all that, NOT INJURED. So yes, Joshua can make Breazeale look like an complete idiot, even a heavely injured elderly did.
Breazeale is like a Hyundai, Mansour like a broken Volkswagen and Joshua like a brand new Mercedes in this case.
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Joshua vs Wilder will be a doozy. Whenever that happens.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Now I look at it back I think Joshua simply showed a completely differend style.
He doesn't go for the KO straight away, but simply uses his opponend like a punching bag and slowly fights him till the KO without taking any risk.
That's mature, but more boring to watch.
I still think Joshua is the best heavyweight on earth, somehow his style adepted since Whyte and now takes his time.
He doesn't go for the KO straight away, but simply uses his opponend like a punching bag and slowly fights him till the KO without taking any risk.
That's mature, but more boring to watch.
I still think Joshua is the best heavyweight on earth, somehow his style adepted since Whyte and now takes his time.
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Thats what Parkers always done.asdfjkl wrote:Now I look at it back I think Joshua simply showed a completely differend style.
He doesn't go for the KO straight away, but simply uses his opponend like a punching bag and slowly fights him till the KO without taking any risk.
That's mature, but more boring to watch.
I still think Joshua is the best heavyweight on earth, somehow his style adepted since Whyte and now takes his time.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Yea, but AJ has only lost one round in all his fights yet, today he also won every round. You can't say such things of Parker for example.foxdog1923 wrote:Thats what Parkers always done.asdfjkl wrote:Now I look at it back I think Joshua simply showed a completely differend style.
He doesn't go for the KO straight away, but simply uses his opponend like a punching bag and slowly fights him till the KO without taking any risk.
That's mature, but more boring to watch.
I still think Joshua is the best heavyweight on earth, somehow his style adepted since Whyte and now takes his time.
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Takam is better than Breazeale and Martin, I thought I'd mention that.asdfjkl wrote:Yea, but AJ has only lost one round in all his fights yet, today he also won every round. You can't say such things of Parker for example.foxdog1923 wrote:Thats what Parkers always done.asdfjkl wrote:Now I look at it back I think Joshua simply showed a completely differend style.
He doesn't go for the KO straight away, but simply uses his opponend like a punching bag and slowly fights him till the KO without taking any risk.
That's mature, but more boring to watch.
I still think Joshua is the best heavyweight on earth, somehow his style adepted since Whyte and now takes his time.
Also before you use to make a fuss about Parker taking awhile to KO people and now that Joshua has taken awhile (as I predicted on this thread) you all of a sudden change your mind lol.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
I think Parker simply can't do what Joshua does, Parker is continually on his limits, for Joshua all guys Parker ever fought would be sparringpartners.foxdog1923 wrote:Takam is better than Breazeale and Martin, I thought I'd mention that.asdfjkl wrote:Yea, but AJ has only lost one round in all his fights yet, today he also won every round. You can't say such things of Parker for example.foxdog1923 wrote: Thats what Parkers always done.
Also before you use to make a fuss about Parker taking awhile to KO people and now that Joshua has taken awhile (as I predicted on this thread) you all of a sudden change your mind lol.
I admit Takam is better as Breazeale and Martin, but I still don't think Takam would win a single round against Joshua.
I also still think Whyte can win against Parker, if he. gets in shape again.
-
foxdog1923
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1105
- Joined: 29 Jun 2009, 13:58
Re: Anthony Joshua vs Dominic Breazeale
Whyte looked really bad against Bacurin or whatever that nobody was that he fought. You watch all Whyte fights hes too sloppy and he will get knocked out again. Hes really easy to hit. Like all the other posters say, he only looked good against Joshua.asdfjkl wrote:I think Parker simply can't do what Joshua does, Parker is continually on his limits, for Joshua all guys Parker ever fought would be sparringpartners.foxdog1923 wrote:Takam is better than Breazeale and Martin, I thought I'd mention that.asdfjkl wrote: Yea, but AJ has only lost one round in all his fights yet, today he also won every round. You can't say such things of Parker for example.
Also before you use to make a fuss about Parker taking awhile to KO people and now that Joshua has taken awhile (as I predicted on this thread) you all of a sudden change your mind lol.
I admit Takam is better as Breazeale and Martin, but I still don't think Takam would win a single round against Joshua.
I also still think Whyte can win against Parker, if he. gets in shape again.