"Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post Reply
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

"Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by TheLeprechaun »

Really makes English look like a mug..
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Stuarty »

He was an ounce over. If he'd have taken his knickers off he would've probably made it. He didn't want to get his wee winky out infront of his old man though :o
chrisnew86
Super Welterweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by chrisnew86 »

TheLeprechaun wrote:Really makes English look like a mug..
He was an ounce over mate, really not a big deal
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by littlepug »

did he lose the ounce ?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Stuarty »

littlepug wrote:did he lose the ounce ?
He could've lost that having a danger wank in the disabled toilet
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Stuarty »

Murray came in over too. I didn't realise there was so much of a height difference between Groves n Murray til I saw the face to face earlier!
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by olij999 »

Only an ounce, but over is over. If you're fighting for a title, you make the weight, end of. It's a weight-regulated sport, for heaven's sake. Otherwise you end up having some sort of sliding scale, such as:

(a) Less than a pound over - well, that's OK really, isn't it. It's sort of close. Rather like putting 2 + 2 is 4 and a half in a maths exam - that'll do.
(b) 1 lb to 2 lb over - bit naughty, but hey, we shouldn't get too cross. It's not a million miles away after all.
(c) 2 lb to 3 lb - now that really is not very good. Must try harder next time. But let's just pay the other guy some money and carry on with the fight.
(d) 4 lb to 5 lb - boxer uses the "water retention" excuse.
(e) 6lb or more - the Guzman/Fielding school of just missing it.

Was the Eubank weight a second weight after trying to lose some (given that it is a day-before weigh-in), or did he not try to lose any at all?
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by ILikeBeer »

Stuarty30 wrote:
littlepug wrote:did he lose the ounce ?
He could've lost that having a danger wank in the disabled toilet
:lol:

Now there's a weight loss technique we can all enjoy.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Cyclops »

Stuarty30 wrote:Murray came in over too. I didn't realise there was so much of a height difference between Groves n Murray til I saw the face to face earlier!
Murray must be really little. Groves was certainly shorter than Froch who himself says he is bang on 6', not the 6'1 he is listed at.

Murray looks about 5'9". Odd to list yourself at 6'. Looks a bit silly now, eh.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Murray looked old and a bit drawn to me. I wonder if age is catching up with him and making the weight has been a battle. Groves by KO.
rpms
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by rpms »

ILikeBeer wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
littlepug wrote:did he lose the ounce ?
He could've lost that having a danger wank in the disabled toilet
:lol:

Now there's a weight loss technique we can all enjoy.
Unless you`re waiting outside the toilet for a danger-poop
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by crusader »

Stuarty30 wrote:Murray came in over too. I didn't realise there was so much of a height difference between Groves n Murray til I saw the face to face earlier!
Any shots of them face to face with their footwear (or lack thereof) visible? At times Groves was looking 3 inches taller, but I have doubts about whether there's really that much in it.

edit: it looks to me like Murray was barefoot while Groves was in shoes at the weigh-in head to head.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by Stuarty »

crusader wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Murray came in over too. I didn't realise there was so much of a height difference between Groves n Murray til I saw the face to face earlier!
Any shots of them face to face with their footwear (or lack thereof) visible? At times Groves was looking 3 inches taller, but I have doubts about whether there's really that much in it.

edit: it looks to me like Murray was barefoot while Groves was in shoes at the weigh-in head to head.
Groves had his platforms on :TU:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23227
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by handsofstone »

ILikeBeer wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
littlepug wrote:did he lose the ounce ?
He could've lost that having a danger wank in the disabled toilet
:lol:

Now there's a weight loss technique we can all enjoy.
Think i might try lose some weight when the mrs goes to bed later
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 644
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by sharpei_louis »

olij999 wrote:Only an ounce, but over is over. If you're fighting for a title, you make the weight, end of. It's a weight-regulated sport, for heaven's sake. Otherwise you end up having some sort of sliding scale, such as:

(a) Less than a pound over - well, that's OK really, isn't it. It's sort of close. Rather like putting 2 + 2 is 4 and a half in a maths exam - that'll do.
(b) 1 lb to 2 lb over - bit naughty, but hey, we shouldn't get too cross. It's not a million miles away after all.
(c) 2 lb to 3 lb - now that really is not very good. Must try harder next time. But let's just pay the other guy some money and carry on with the fight.
(d) 4 lb to 5 lb - boxer uses the "water retention" excuse.
(e) 6lb or more - the Guzman/Fielding school of just missing it.

Was the Eubank weight a second weight after trying to lose some (given that it is a day-before weigh-in), or did he not try to lose any at all?

Come on pal I get the point about professionalism and drawing a line, but you could have a p*ss and lose an ounce.
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: "Professional" Eubank Jr. comes in overweight...

Post by olij999 »

sharpei_louis wrote:
olij999 wrote:Only an ounce, but over is over. If you're fighting for a title, you make the weight, end of. It's a weight-regulated sport, for heaven's sake. Otherwise you end up having some sort of sliding scale, such as:

(a) Less than a pound over - well, that's OK really, isn't it. It's sort of close. Rather like putting 2 + 2 is 4 and a half in a maths exam - that'll do.
(b) 1 lb to 2 lb over - bit naughty, but hey, we shouldn't get too cross. It's not a million miles away after all.
(c) 2 lb to 3 lb - now that really is not very good. Must try harder next time. But let's just pay the other guy some money and carry on with the fight.
(d) 4 lb to 5 lb - boxer uses the "water retention" excuse.
(e) 6lb or more - the Guzman/Fielding school of just missing it.

Was the Eubank weight a second weight after trying to lose some (given that it is a day-before weigh-in), or did he not try to lose any at all?

Come on pal I get the point about professionalism and drawing a line, but you could have a p*ss and lose an ounce.
Which is why he went and skipped it off (as he is allowed to do because of a day before weigh-in) - because it matters.
Post Reply