top manNeil Gee wrote:rossij8 wrote:Hi NeilMort wrote:Neil Gee's RBR hits two pages
Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Thanx to you, mostly. Cheers MortMort wrote:Neil Gee's RBR hits two pages
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Good fight this, Fana getting back into itMort wrote:Turbo's getting exposed, how many times has Fana landed that right hand?
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Fana hasn't won a round. Commentators useless as usual.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
he won the last oneIan1973 wrote:Fana hasn't won a round. Commentators useless as usual.
Last edited by rossij8 on 16 Jul 2016, 16:07, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
no he didn't.rossij8 wrote:he won the the last oneIan1973 wrote:Fana hasn't won a round. Commentators useless as usual.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Bloody hell this is dreadful...Rigo on this card to make Flanagan look exciting?
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
I'm backing Crolla more with every round that passes.Mort wrote:Turbo's getting exposed, how many times has Fana landed that right hand?
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
This card is dire.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Generally the norm nowadayslefty wrote:This card is dire.
I try and enjoy them anyhow
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
he didnt look himself vs Derry either,tempo isnt there at the moment.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Fana just surviving now. NO stamina at 42.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
The commentary keeps saying Flanagan is looking a little flat, I think that's right, but he just can't figure Fana out. You'd have to pick Fana to have taken Flanagan apart in his heydey on this evidence.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Flanagan showing limitations in his offence. Counters the jab well with the right hook but not able to open Fana up when Fana's on the back foot.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
On this evidence Flanagan beats Fana just as easy when he was at his best, he was a super featherweight then and it's not been particularly competitive, just that Fana is a horrible awkward little bastard, Flanagan can't really be arsed and he hasn't quite pinned him down to get the finish.Neil Gee wrote:The commentary keeps saying Flanagan is looking a little flat, I think that's right, but he just can't figure Fana out. You'd have to pick Fana to have taken Flanagan apart in his heydey on this evidence.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
I don't know what anyone is moaning about. Complete domination from Flanagan.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13363
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
A perfect warm up for Zlaticanin....
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Terry gets it. Phew I was sweating on that decision!
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
So all three judges have it wider than the clueless commentators, surprise, surprise.
Might have been no KO but Flanagan pissed it.
Might have been no KO but Flanagan pissed it.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Mort wrote:Yep, 'complete domination' of a middleaged Superfeather, you've got to be impressed.Ian1973 wrote:I don't know what anyone is moaning about. Complete domination from Flanagan.
Yawn.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
maley1984 wrote:skanksta wrote:Langford needs another year @ this/English title level before he goes for even the British.
IF he does that and keeps improving he could be a decent Euro-level champ.
Beating Eubank jr is pie in the sky - totally different levels.
I'm sure Langford is ranked number 4 by the wbo.
I'm sure he is, but let's be real. Eubank would marmalise him right now and he's unlikely to do more than win a European title.
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
I don't think Flanagan's got a future as a tv personality!
-
wesshaw1985
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Fwank should get Terry straight back out on the Canelo vs. Smith undercard vs. Michael Perez or Jose Felix jr...
Re: Guillermo Rigondeaux vs Jazza Dickens and undercard. RBR.
Jim had him winning the one round as wellIan1973 wrote:So all three judges have it wider than the clueless commentators, surprise, surprise.
Might have been no KO but Flanagan pissed it.
I like Jim