
Kalan wrote: What happened in Ali-Liston 2 is this.. Liston was decked by a sharp right to the cheek.. .
I'll have a look later, evil fiend. My guess will be that he recycles the self serving time delay myth but can't honestly remember. The book is from the early 70s and he is overall very frank, especially about his reasons for not fighting Sonny Liston and Joe Frazier.Caractacus wrote:I am going to guess that those are pages from Henry Cooper's autobiography ?
If so,what did he have to say about the few minutes rest he had between round four and five with his first fight with Muhammad Ali ?
I agree the knockdown looked a little theatrical... Maybe Liston was trying to convince Ali that he was hurt... Ali attacked Liston with a barrage of punches after Liston got up, but Ali missed every shot.. Maybe Liston was trying to set Ali up for a big punch right there.. When Walcott told Liston he was down for 10 seconds Liston was in shock.. LIke Walcott, Sonny probably didn't know exactly what the rule was right then.. How could he launch a protest?Controversial wrote:Liston was controlled by the mob so is it beyond the realms of possibility that something fishy happened? The over theatrical rolling around by Liston looks fake as hell. If Liston was so prepared to fight on why didn't he protest at the stoppage, he just stood there and walked off. No way that fight was a legit one in my opinion.
Very good points Kalan. Walcott definitely screwed up and should have ignored Fleischer.Kalan wrote:Here's a question ... If Liston wanted to TANK the fight, why wouldn't he wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner and come back and count him out??? ... Why would Liston get up as soon as Walcott gained control of Ali and shoved him into a neutral corner... If you're intent on losing the fight you'd wait for the referee to count you out... You're not going to get up, square off to fight, and duck a lot of follow up punches.
Personally I think he was listening to the ringside count and when he heard 10 he stood up thinking the fight was over. When Walcott told them to fight on, your right he was as confused as hell as he thought he had lost and then didn't know what to do. No one knew what was going on. No way could he fake two knockouts in the same round but thats what he had to try and do so let Ali throw punches at him without reply, as soon as a half decent one landed he would've fallen to the floor again for another Oscar winning performance. Walcotts' balls up gave Liston the perfect cover story and excuse, after all whose going to admit to throwing a title fight like that? I bet they made a fortune on that fight.Kalan wrote:Here's a question ... If Liston wanted to TANK the fight, why wouldn't he wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner and come back and count him out??? ... Why would Liston get up as soon as Walcott gained control of Ali and shoved him into a neutral corner... If you're intent on losing the fight you'd wait for the referee to count you out... You're not going to get up, square off to fight, and duck a lot of follow up punches.
The idea of Sonny being intimidated by the Mob is definitely a possibility....this was arguably one of the peak periods of their influence when they were controlling a whole range of sectors - not just boxing - and they were incredibly violent and ruthless.Liston was controlled by the mob so is it beyond the realms of possibility that something fishy happened? The over theatrical rolling around by Liston looks fake as hell. If Liston was so prepared to fight on why didn't he protest at the stoppage, he just stood there and walked off. No way that fight was a legit one in my opinion.
For sure, no way was Ali complicit in itSteveO wrote:Only Liston knew whether he threw the fight or not. If he did, he had his reasons and we'll never know for sure. Walcott still screwed up though.
Either way it was nothing to do with Ali. Ali wanted the fight to continue so he could give Sonny a beating.
There is a famous photograph of him standing over Liston and saying something like "Get up and fight you bum".
There's a MASSIVE problem with EVERYTHING you're trying to insinuate... There was bedlam in the place because Ali was running around and refusing to go to a neutral corner... If Walcott and Ali couldn't hear the count HOW could Liston??? Listen to that video closely and you don't hear ANY count... And Listen DID NOT wait for 10 and then get up late -- such as Charles Martin and Willie Monroe did.. Liston was on the canvas for at least 12 because Ali wasn't going to a neutral corner... AND boxers are taught NOT to get up until your opponent heads for a neutral corner as the rules state.. MANY times you see boxers violate this teaching.. They jump up and get hit again by an overly excited and oblivious opponent who didn't head for the corner.. That's why you stay down and protect yourself at all times if your opponent is standing over you or running around like a mad man ignoring the referee. If you watch the video, Liston gets up when Walcott gets control of Ali. Normally the count is suspended if a boxer scoring a knockdown behaves like that. That didn't happen in Ali-Liston 2 -- and it was not corrected immediately because Lewiston Maine is the sticks -- and not a bastion of knowledgeable boxing commissioners.Controversial wrote:Personally I think he was listening to the ringside count and when he heard 10 he stood up thinking the fight was over. When Walcott told them to fight on, your right he was as confused as hell as he thought he had lost and then didn't know what to do. No one knew what was going on. No way could he fake two knockouts in the same round but thats what he had to try and do so let Ali throw punches at him without reply, as soon as a half decent one landed he would've fallen to the floor again for another Oscar winning performance. Walcotts' balls up gave Liston the perfect cover story and excuse, after all whose going to admit to throwing a title fight like that? I bet they made a fortune on that fight.Kalan wrote:Here's a question ... If Liston wanted to TANK the fight, why wouldn't he wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner and come back and count him out??? ... Why would Liston get up as soon as Walcott gained control of Ali and shoved him into a neutral corner... If you're intent on losing the fight you'd wait for the referee to count you out... You're not going to get up, square off to fight, and duck a lot of follow up punches.
My version makes far more sense. So what if you can't hear the count, doesn't mean there wasn't one. However If you turn the volume up loud you can hear the canvas being banged so I don't buy that.Kalan wrote:There's a MASSIVE problem with EVERYTHING you're trying to insinuate... There was bedlam in the place because Ali was running around and refusing to go to a neutral corner... If Walcott and Ali couldn't hear the count HOW could Liston??? Listen to that video closely and you don't hear ANY count... And Listen DID NOT wait for 10 and then get up late -- such as Charles Martin and Willie Monroe did.. Liston was on the canvas for at least 12 because Ali wasn't going to a neutral corner... AND boxers are taught NOT to get up until your opponent heads for a neutral corner as the rules state.. MANY times you see boxers violate this teaching.. They jump up and get hit again by an overly excited and oblivious opponent who didn't head for the corner.. That's why you stay down and protect yourself at all times if your opponent is standing over you or running around like a mad man ignoring the referee. If you watch the video, Liston gets up when Walcott gets control of Ali. Normally the count is suspended if a boxer scoring a knockdown behaves like that. That didn't happen in Ali-Liston 2 -- and it was not corrected immediately because Lewiston Maine is the sticks -- and not a bastion of knowledgeable boxing commissioners.Controversial wrote:Personally I think he was listening to the ringside count and when he heard 10 he stood up thinking the fight was over. When Walcott told them to fight on, your right he was as confused as hell as he thought he had lost and then didn't know what to do. No one knew what was going on. No way could he fake two knockouts in the same round but thats what he had to try and do so let Ali throw punches at him without reply, as soon as a half decent one landed he would've fallen to the floor again for another Oscar winning performance. Walcotts' balls up gave Liston the perfect cover story and excuse, after all whose going to admit to throwing a title fight like that? I bet they made a fortune on that fight.Kalan wrote:Here's a question ... If Liston wanted to TANK the fight, why wouldn't he wait for Walcott to push Ali to a neutral corner and come back and count him out??? ... Why would Liston get up as soon as Walcott gained control of Ali and shoved him into a neutral corner... If you're intent on losing the fight you'd wait for the referee to count you out... You're not going to get up, square off to fight, and duck a lot of follow up punches.
You say Liston was waiting for Ali to hit him again so he could take another pratfall... Then why was he ducking all the follow up punches so expertly??? ... Why would he take another hit and go down again??? He made the overexcited Ali miss every follow-up punch. Liston an Ali had
The Boxing Establishment quickly made Liston the fall guy -- and that cleaned up their mess... "You faked a knockdown" They put it all on Sonny the ex-con
I defended Ali when he were the victim and the wronged party -- like he WAS on occasion... I defended Ali all the time on the draft and Viet Nam War.. I was a vet against the Viet Nam War and Ali's stand was very courageous. Ali was a hero to us anti-war activists. We loved the man. But just because a man is a prince and a champion in the cause of peace, doesn't mean he's perfect in all areas.. Ali was wrong for throwing out the rule book and refusing to go to a neutral corner in Ali-Liston 2.. NOBODY is above the law.. YOUR version makes NO sense because WHEN have you EVER seen a boxer counted out by the timekeeper when his opponent refused to go to a neutral corner??? ... I have seen that type of behavior twice in amateur fights and both boxers running around were DQ'd... I can't remember a professional fight where one boxer refused to go to the neutral corner for the ENTIRE 10-COUNT in any other fight I've ever seen... Have you??? ... What do YOU think would have been fair for Liston in this case???Controversial wrote:My version makes far more sense. So what if you can't hear the count, doesn't mean there wasn't one. However If you turn the volume up loud you can hear the canvas being banged so I don't buy that.Kalan wrote:There's a MASSIVE problem with EVERYTHING you're trying to insinuate... There was bedlam in the place because Ali was running around and refusing to go to a neutral corner... If Walcott and Ali couldn't hear the count HOW could Liston??? Listen to that video closely and you don't hear ANY count... And Listen DID NOT wait for 10 and then get up late -- such as Charles Martin and Willie Monroe did.. Liston was on the canvas for at least 12 because Ali wasn't going to a neutral corner... AND boxers are taught NOT to get up until your opponent heads for a neutral corner as the rules state.. MANY times you see boxers violate this teaching.. They jump up and get hit again by an overly excited and oblivious opponent who didn't head for the corner.. That's why you stay down and protect yourself at all times if your opponent is standing over you or running around like a mad man ignoring the referee. If you watch the video, Liston gets up when Walcott gets control of Ali. Normally the count is suspended if a boxer scoring a knockdown behaves like that. That didn't happen in Ali-Liston 2 -- and it was not corrected immediately because Lewiston Maine is the sticks -- and not a bastion of knowledgeable boxing commissioners.Controversial wrote:
Personally I think he was listening to the ringside count and when he heard 10 he stood up thinking the fight was over. When Walcott told them to fight on, your right he was as confused as hell as he thought he had lost and then didn't know what to do. No one knew what was going on. No way could he fake two knockouts in the same round but thats what he had to try and do so let Ali throw punches at him without reply, as soon as a half decent one landed he would've fallen to the floor again for another Oscar winning performance. Walcotts' balls up gave Liston the perfect cover story and excuse, after all whose going to admit to throwing a title fight like that? I bet they made a fortune on that fight.
You say Liston was waiting for Ali to hit him again so he could take another pratfall... Then why was he ducking all the follow up punches so expertly??? ... Why would he take another hit and go down again??? He made the overexcited Ali miss every follow-up punch. Liston an Ali had
The Boxing Establishment quickly made Liston the fall guy -- and that cleaned up their mess... "You faked a knockdown" They put it all on Sonny the ex-con
It would be interesting to hear your version had the same result happened in reverse, I think everyone knows you wouldn't defend Ali. Had the reverse happened I would be as suspicious of Ali, it was one of the worst acting jobs you can see. Liston wasn't the brightest spark and his mob ties are well known, as you said yourself Liston and Walcott didn't know the rules. Lucky Liston had the perfect cover story.
Exactly you proved my point. No praise for wins or his boxing achievements, they were all mismatches or lucky according to you. I asked you weeks ago what made Ali a great fighter, as you claimed he was in one post, and none of your replies had anything to do with boxing, just his personality, charisma and political views. That says it all to me.Kalan wrote:
I defended Ali when he were the victim and the wronged party -- like he WAS on occasion... I defended Ali all the time on the draft and Viet Nam War.. I was a vet against the Viet Nam War and Ali's stand was very courageous. Ali was a hero to us anti-war activists. We loved the man. But just because a man is a prince and a champion in the cause of peace, doesn't mean he's perfect in all areas.. Ali was wrong for throwing out the rule book and refusing to go to a neutral corner in Ali-Liston 2.. NOBODY is above the law.. YOUR version makes NO sense because WHEN have you EVER seen a boxer counted out by the timekeeper when his opponent refused to go to a neutral corner??? ... I have seen that type of behavior twice in amateur fights and both boxers running around were DQ'd... I can't remember a professional fight where one boxer refused to go to the neutral corner for the ENTIRE 10-COUNT in any other fight I've ever seen... Have you??? ... What do YOU think would have been fair for Liston in this case???
Fair point but they looked legit, Listons didn't. When you add in the mob ties and FBI reports suspecting a fix then it adds another dimension to it. Ali had him beat no matter what and Liston knew it. I know not everyone agrees with this line of thinking but I happen to.Tuan_Jim wrote:I always thought the punch that downed Liston was legit. The 'how many other fighters did he KO in 1?' argument is silly. How many names did Nunn KO in 1, other than Kalambay? And Kalambay had a great chin too. How many names did Hill KO in 1, other than Tiozzo? And Tiozzo had a great chin too.
Liston never claimed he was knocked out by Ali... That's a lie... He took a sharp right and went down... It was a well timed punch with good force on it... NO CRIME in Heavyweight Boxing getting hit in the head and going down is it??? ... Liston than patiently waited for mad man Ali to head to a neutral corner... If a crazy man is standing over you and running around the ring -- and you KNOW about the neutral corner rule that's Ai is violating, then you wait for the referee to gain control.. You DON'T think you'll have to wait the full count -- but nobody is counting over you because the referee is busy trying to control Ali.. Who is breaking the rules in that situation...Liston or Ali???? -- I know you won't answer that.Controversial wrote: Yet he claims Ali, who almost never knocked anyone out with one punch, knocked him down with a punch that Liston ordinarily would've sneered at. Sorry no doubt in my mind, a fix. I take it you never read the FBI files released a few years ago which gives reason why they suspected foul play?