Tuan_Jim wrote:Conn was effective because he was light & could be fleet footed. Ever seen one of those 6'5, 250lb behemoths against Louis? Size & brute strength didn't work much against such a precise, measured technician. Louis, like David Haye and Cassius Clay, had his worst moments versus smaller men.
Because Louis never met a fast and highly skilled big man. Big Heavyweights of his day were clumsy oafs like Abe Simon.
You know little about human physiology ... Fast hands, quick feet, and overall athletic speed and agility are not portioned out in direct relationship to size, height, reach, and strength.. Many boxers much smaller than Conn were very slow, such as: Gene Fullmer, Jake LaMotta, Arthur Abraham, Paul Pender, Tony Sibson, and William Joppy... Many boxers much bigger than Joe Louis were fast, such as: David Haye, Wladimir Klitschko, Muhammad Ali, Larry Homes, Anthony Joshua, and Jack Johnson when they were at their peak... Speed is only one (1) lonely attribute such as height.. Any attribute is only great if you put it to good use - and have many other attributes to compliment it. Having fast hands doesn't mean you have fast feet.
Many good sized Heavyweights such as Kirk Johnson, Buster Douglas, Corrie Sanders, and Larry Donald had good natural hand and foot speed — but never developed that speed to the greatest use because of very lazy and inconsistent training habits.. Also poor development of their physical strength and conditioning potential and failure to develop technical skills.