Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post Reply
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

How does everyone think the rematch would play out? Frampton looked very good on Saturday but I think there's better to come. Quigg is a big SBW so the jump up shouldn't really affect him too much I wouldn't have thought.

I think Carl would win a lot more convincing second time around possibly by late stoppage or wide on the cards. I think Quigg would take a lot more chances and that could be his downfall. Interesting fight if it were to happen. The extra weight might give Quigg an extra gear also and he's already super fit so you never know.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Covfefe »

I was impressed with Carl's stamina the other night, which means he was probably draining to stay at SBW. I thought Quigg was getting the better of Frampton towards the end of the fight but if Carl's stamina has improved he may win wider, if Quigg opened up earlier he might be in more danger too, personally I reckon we'd see a similar result.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by samwbr »

Could be some time before Quigg gets another shot v Frampton.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

samwbr wrote:Could be some time before Quigg gets another shot v Frampton.
Agreed, back of the queue he is. They e beaten him at home no real questions over result.

Quigg can go back to beating nobodies on mismatchroom quigg will need to win a world title first before its even a discussion
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

God no, the last fight was like a paint drying convention.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:
samwbr wrote:Could be some time before Quigg gets another shot v Frampton.
Agreed, back of the queue he is. They e beaten him at home no real questions over result.

Quigg can go back to beating nobodies on mismatchroom quigg will need to win a world title first before its even a discussion
Maybe he could take on Rigo? A win there would catapult him to the front of the line for some big fights! Mighty task but stranger things have happened. Plus it should be an easy enough fight to make.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:God no, the last fight was like a paint drying convention.
It was awful lol. Surely it couldn't be as bad second time around?
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Stuarty30 wrote:
ThereByTheGrace wrote:
samwbr wrote:Could be some time before Quigg gets another shot v Frampton.
Agreed, back of the queue he is. They e beaten him at home no real questions over result.

Quigg can go back to beating nobodies on mismatchroom quigg will need to win a world title first before its even a discussion
Maybe he could take on Rigo? A win there would catapult him to the front of the line for some big fights! Mighty task but stranger things have happened. Plus it should be an easy enough fight to make.
Yeah maybe he could but Id think a fight with Selby might be better if hes moving up. Frampton likely only to fight him in Belfast now cant see Hearn allowing it
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by brian13 »

Stuarty30 wrote:I think Quigg would take a lot more chances and that could be his downfall. Interesting fight if it were to happen. The extra weight might give Quigg an extra gear also and he's already super fit so you never know.


If Quigg is super fit why did he not throw more, push the tempo and give Frampton a much better test?

Quigg really needs to prove himself to warrant another shot at Frampton and I don't think he can because the Featherweight division is a great division.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

brian13 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I think Quigg would take a lot more chances and that could be his downfall. Interesting fight if it were to happen. The extra weight might give Quigg an extra gear also and he's already super fit so you never know.


If Quigg is super fit why did he not throw more, push the tempo and give Frampton a much better test?

Quigg really needs to prove himself to warrant another shot at Frampton and I don't think he can because the Featherweight division is a great division.
Quigg is super fit mate. He has a great engine. I have no idea why he didn't do more in the first six against Carl. I don't know if it was the tactics or what but it was very strange. He got his jaw broke early as well. Carl must be a nightmare to fight against. He judges the distance so well and is a spiteful counter puncher. If they were to fight again I think Carl beats him more convincingly and they should demand it's in Belfast.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Crease »

Carl's struggle to get down to Super Bantam took something from him and he beat Quigg (and broke his jaw).

If Quigg fought him at Featheweight, Carl would hurt him even more so.

A Frampton stoppage.
manchester-mexican
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by manchester-mexican »

Santa Cruz never got going to mid rounds either, maybe Carls footwork better than ppl think, I can't see Quigg beating Carl in rematch he just not good enough, fair play to Frampton , he wanted LSC a long time n proved why.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by DannyMCR »

I'm a fan of both but I'd hate to see a rematch between the two. Perhaps in a few fights/years as circumstances change, but no chance so soon, no selling point for the rematch either..
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3381
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Mentally I don't think Quigg will ever be the same man again after his loss. I doubt we'll see him fighting for a proper world title again
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

manchester-mexican wrote:Santa Cruz never got going to mid rounds either, maybe Carls footwork better than ppl think, I can't see Quigg beating Carl in rematch he just not good enough, fair play to Frampton , he wanted LSC a long time n proved why.
Yes, Carl has excellent footwork, that and the feints and head movement, made it very difficult for LSC to get a bead on him, it was only when Carl became more static and stood right in front of him without moving, that he was able to line him up, not sure whether that was because Carl fancied it, or he was tiring from the movement.

There was a point in the fight where I thought Carl could have put his foot on the gas and really tried to hurt LSC.
manchester-mexican
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by manchester-mexican »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
manchester-mexican wrote:Santa Cruz never got going to mid rounds either, maybe Carls footwork better than ppl think, I can't see Quigg beating Carl in rematch he just not good enough, fair play to Frampton , he wanted LSC a long time n proved why.
Yes, Carl has excellent footwork, that and the feints and head movement, made it very difficult for LSC to get a bead on him, it was only when Carl became more static and stood right in front of him without moving, that he was able to line him up, not sure whether that was because Carl fancied it, or he was tiring from the movement.

There was a point in the fight where I thought Carl could have put his foot on the gas and really tried to hurt LSC.
listening to him after the fight I honestly think he traded to make the fight more a classic, kept saying he wanted it to be remembered, risky thing to do if that the case, was easily out boxing Cruz early rounds. Thought he should have jumped on him in the second.
Last edited by manchester-mexican on 01 Aug 2016, 13:33, edited 1 time in total.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by littlepug »

Stuarty30 wrote:
brian13 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I think Quigg would take a lot more chances and that could be his downfall. Interesting fight if it were to happen. The extra weight might give Quigg an extra gear also and he's already super fit so you never know.


If Quigg is super fit why did he not throw more, push the tempo and give Frampton a much better test?

Quigg really needs to prove himself to warrant another shot at Frampton and I don't think he can because the Featherweight division is a great division.
Quigg is super fit mate. He has a great engine. I have no idea why he didn't do more in the first six against Carl. I don't know if it was the tactics or what but it was very strange. He got his jaw broke early as well. Carl must be a nightmare to fight against. He judges the distance so well and is a spiteful counter puncher. If they were to fight again I think Carl beats him more convincingly and they should demand it's in Belfast.
i put the blame on gallagher, he has all his lads box that way rather than letting them think for themselves and boxing instinctively
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Rexob »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:Mentally I don't think Quigg will ever be the same man again after his loss. I doubt we'll see him fighting for a proper world title again

I Think you are right where is he 6 months after last fight? Has he done a Cleverly mentally shot to pieces because he thought he was unbeatable? With close ones blowing smoke up his arse everyday of his life, then can't cope with defeat? Or is he just having a rest?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

Rexob wrote:
CaptainSpacerod wrote:Mentally I don't think Quigg will ever be the same man again after his loss. I doubt we'll see him fighting for a proper world title again

I Think you are right where is he 6 months after last fight? Has he done a Cleverly mentally shot to pieces because he thought he was unbeatable? With close ones blowing smoke up his arse everyday of his life, then can't cope with defeat? Or is he just having a rest?
He broke his jaw mate
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by MightyWarrior »

Mother of god, no.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Rexob »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Rexob wrote:
CaptainSpacerod wrote:Mentally I don't think Quigg will ever be the same man again after his loss. I doubt we'll see him fighting for a proper world title again

I Think you are right where is he 6 months after last fight? Has he done a Cleverly mentally shot to pieces because he thought he was unbeatable? With close ones blowing smoke up his arse everyday of his life, then can't cope with defeat? Or is he just having a rest?
He broke his jaw mate

The Pussy, is that all he has had.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Frampton v Quigg at 126?

Post by Stuarty »

Rexob wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Rexob wrote:

I Think you are right where is he 6 months after last fight? Has he done a Cleverly mentally shot to pieces because he thought he was unbeatable? With close ones blowing smoke up his arse everyday of his life, then can't cope with defeat? Or is he just having a rest?
He broke his jaw mate

The Pussy, is that all he has had.
Exactly! Feckin girl :lol:
Post Reply