Hearns vs McCallum

Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Kalan »

LOOK!!!! Iran Barkley knocked Hearns down 3 times and 2 fights and beat him twice... but every time he found Tommy's chin it was a lucky shot correct?

Thing Is...Iran Barkley couldn't do that to James Toney.. Michael Nunn.. Nigel Benn.. or Sumbu Kalambay ... Hearns ducked all those fighters and Barkley fought them all...taking his 4 ass-beatings like a man ... instead of a ducking candy ass like that tall, skinny kid who couldn't hang with The Blade.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

Hearns ducked Benn?

I'm *fascinated* to see your explanation for that.

Pay particular attention to the timeline.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tommy by fairly wide decision. McCallum would have lost to Leonard, Hagler and Benitez too. His best shot would have been Duran.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Kalan »

Mike McCallum would have blown Tommy Hearns away in 2 rounds... He would have done a Marv Hagler job on him -- only faster... Watch McCallum rip the stomach out of monster hitter Julian Jackson, who was 29-0 -- and that will give you an idea of how long Hearns would have lasted.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by gilgamesh »

Kalan wrote:Mike McCallum would have blown Tommy Hearns away in 2 rounds... He would have done a Marv Hagler job on him -- only faster... Watch McCallum rip the stomach out of monster hitter Julian Jackson, who was 29-0 -- and that will give you an idea of how long Hearns would have lasted.
I don't know what it is you ever saw out of Mike McCallum to suggest he's a better fighter than Marvin Hagler, and would have an easier time with Hearns than Hagler did, but I sure never saw it.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

Kalan wrote:Mike McCallum would have blown Tommy Hearns away in 2 rounds... He would have done a Marv Hagler job on him -- only faster... Watch McCallum rip the stomach out of monster hitter Julian Jackson, who was 29-0 -- and that will give you an idea of how long Hearns would have lasted.
Yeah, cos it isn't as though Hearns was any more skillful than Julian Jackson is it? If you can hit Jackson you can hit Hearns just as easy. Lmao.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Kalan »

gilgamesh wrote:
Kalan wrote:Mike McCallum would have blown Tommy Hearns away in 2 rounds... He would have done a Marv Hagler job on him -- only faster... Watch McCallum rip the stomach out of monster hitter Julian Jackson, who was 29-0 -- and that will give you an idea of how long Hearns would have lasted.
I don't know what it is you ever saw out of Mike McCallum to suggest he's a better fighter than Marvin Hagler, and would have an easier time with Hearns than Hagler did, but I sure never saw it.
I guess you never saw Sugar Ray Leonard come off a 3-year-layoff to beat Hagler for the Middleweight Title... That set up some potentially tremendous fights: Leonard vs Michael Nunn or Mike McCallum... Leonard abandoned his Middleweight Title Belt a la Canelo -- rather then fight them.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

gilgamesh wrote:
Kalan wrote:
cfang wrote:Hearns like hagler and leonard was a superfighter - mike mc was a step below that
Iran Barkley WASN'T a superfighter and he beat Hearns twice with ease... McCallum would have beaten Barkley with ease -- and Hearns even easier.
Barkley didn't beat Hearns with ease the 1st time. He caught him and won by KO, but he was getting his ass handed to him prior to that. I've never seen the 2nd fight between them.
It was a great fight that could have went either way. Nobody ever beat Hearns without a trip to the ER, save Grant when he twisted his ankle.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

BoxBuzz wrote:
hhaehre wrote:
Kalan wrote:Yeah???? ... Well Hearns weak chin did him in against Barkely -- just like it did versus Hagler and Leonard, who both also knocked Hearns out.

McCallum??? Nobody ever knocked him out or could knock him out... Julian Jackson hit him real good... James Toney hit him real good. He ate it up.
How do you square McCallums loss to Tiozzo, who was beaten by Hill, who in turn was beaten by Hearns? Surely this piece of clever BoxRec research indicates that Hearns would beat McCallum don't you think?

I brought that up earlier.....I think I can quote him "no comment".


McCallum was good...very good....but he wasn't feared or overly avoided by these guys in my estimation. It was just the way the business ball bounced.
He wasn't avoided at all. Duran skipped the mandatory against an unknown McCallum to fight Hearns in a fight everyone wanted to see. Then Hearns fought Hagler. Leonard wasn't even fighting then. Mike moved up to Middleweight after Hagler retired. If he wanted Marvin, he could have moved up, secured a mandatory and got his fight. The ducking claims are akin to saying someone ducked the chicken pox for cancer.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

Counter-puncher wrote:Hearns ducked Benn?

I'm *fascinated* to see your explanation for that.

Pay particular attention to the timeline.
Deafening silence lmao. Kalans mouth writes another cheque before his tiny nubbin of a brain can think to check the.chronology
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Hearns ducked Benn?

I'm *fascinated* to see your explanation for that.

Pay particular attention to the timeline.
Deafening silence lmao. Kalans mouth writes another cheque before his tiny nubbin of a brain can think to check the.chronology
:lol:

Yes he's my favorite fighter, but Thomas Hearns wouldn't duck a 5 foot doorway.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

Hearns' attitude doesn't even need to figure, he departed 160 before Benn was relevant, its that simple
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:Hearns' attitude doesn't even need to figure, he departed 160 before Benn was relevant, its that simple
I know, just ridiculous to say about anyone. He went from 54 to 75 for the hell of it. He's beloved and underrated at the same time. Beating Nate Miller in his 40's at Cruiser was a hell of a win.
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by littlepug »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Hearns ducked Benn?

I'm *fascinated* to see your explanation for that.

Pay particular attention to the timeline.
Deafening silence lmao. Kalans mouth writes another cheque before his tiny nubbin of a brain can think to check the.chronology
:lol:

Yes he's my favorite fighter, but Thomas Hearns wouldn't duck a 5 foot doorway.
Ha ha brilliant :clap:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by gilgamesh »

Counter-puncher wrote:Hearns' attitude doesn't even need to figure, he departed 160 before Benn was relevant, its that simple
Explaining these things to Kalan is a lost cause. If you notice he doesn't even seem to grasp that fighters age and lose the ability they once had. He acts as if losses fighters suffered past their primes prove they couldn't beat fighters of that level in their prime. Even if they already did several times before.

As an example ask him about Terry Norris vs Sugar Ray Leonard or Ali vs Spinks or anything else of that matter. He'll refuse to acknowledge that Leonard or Ali were past their prime, and just go on and on about how fantastic Terry Norris was against Leonard. He's not worth arguing with.

He seems completely unable to grasp very basic concepts in Boxing.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

For us Brits Benn has a similar stature, took risks and risky fight, was in exciting fights, went for the ko and took his defeats like a man when they happened. I grew up to his boxing generation really,and consider myself lucky
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

A similar stature to hearns, not kalan. Just to clarify.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:A similar stature to hearns, not kalan. Just to clarify.
:lol:

I loved Benn here in the states. Probably my favorite Brit fighter. If Haye could have backed it up against Wlad, alas.......
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

It's similar though, some fighters are divisive figures, but i don't know any boxing fan who doesn't love Benn.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Counter-puncher wrote:It's similar though, some fighters are divisive figures, but i don't know any boxing fan who doesn't love Benn.
That's a tough ask indeed. :TU:

Kalan can pull it off.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

Well, Benn was good.

Not as big a puncher as pavlik or pirog, though.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I liked Sibson quite a bit too, part of a solid group of Middleweights at the wrong place and time.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I liked Sibson quite a bit too, part of a solid group of Middleweights at the wrong place and time.
His post-hagler interview was classic.

Hes got this, bemused smile on which sortof lights up when he's trying to express himself, 'nobody...nobodys ever done that to me...ive been boxing since I was eleven and nobody's done that to me...' He tries to encapsulate why hagler is so good and he struggles, he says 'hes got long hands,fast hands... Its not that he punches so hard, he just hits so...correct. I was.... I was well licked, by a master'

The combination of disbelief, admiration and honesty was fucken fantastic.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Kalan »

littlepug wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
Deafening silence lmao. Kalans mouth writes another cheque before his tiny nubbin of a brain can think to check the.chronology
:lol:

Yes he's my favorite fighter, but Thomas Hearns wouldn't duck a 5 foot doorway.
Ha ha brilliant :clap:
Hearns ducked any tough guy who could hit a ton... starting with Mike McCallum
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Hearns vs McCallum

Post by Counter-puncher »

:lol:
Post Reply