Aj v hayemaker
Re: Aj v hayemaker
I doubt it somehow.
Hearn was just on about Joshua fighting Hughie Fury. Hughie Fury stepping out, and David Haye stepping in is a bit of a Quantum Leap.
Hearn was just on about Joshua fighting Hughie Fury. Hughie Fury stepping out, and David Haye stepping in is a bit of a Quantum Leap.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Aj v hayemaker
Nightmare Roy wrote:Get out! Its a great fight Haye is miles more dangerous than anyone AJ has fought. Get past Haye and then unify.asdfjkl wrote: Even AJ loses some respect from me for accepting this fight, it's a waste of time imo.
Re: Aj v hayemaker
asdfjkl wrote:A cruiserweight with a bunch of extra fat on his body isn't a dangerous boxer, simple as that. Let Haye fight Briggs and after that he might move on. Atm he hasn't proven to be any better as Briggs, Breazeale, or name them. Whyte would probably KO him by the first succesful hit.
You can question Haye's personality all you like, but to say the he isn't better than Shannon Briggs is an absurd statement. Or Breazeale.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Aj v hayemaker
Haye's only real chance with Joshua is to set a trap and catch him coming in, if Joshua keeps it long, Haye's feet won't be quick enough to get into range, just as he failed to do against Klitschko. I think the difference is, Joshua will want to finish it, rather than settle for a dull 12 round borefest.Rob3_142 wrote:This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
His most impressive wins were against Ruiz and Chisora, who were both smaller than him. Currently all the heavyweight belt holders are all much much taller than Haye, which suggests he'd struggle to get hands on any belt.
Haye should just fight Briggs, and move up the rankings. There might be a big summer fight with Joshua on, but I don't fancy him winning. thinking either a Joshua blowout, or for Joshua to keep him off for 12 rounds and win on points.
Re: Aj v hayemaker
What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?Rob3_142 wrote:This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
Re: Aj v hayemaker
The taller, stronger, younger, bigger hitting hungrier man wins this. If it happens. It's an obvious cash out for Haye, the only reason he came back, he isn't looking at a long career from here on in.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Aj v hayemaker
Valuev was also dogshit, and there was barely a shot landed in the round. That fight had almost nothing landed.ILikeBeer wrote:What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?Rob3_142 wrote:This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
Wlad beat Haye with ease, using height and reach advantages, because unlike Valuev he wasn't as slow as shit through a funnel.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Aj v hayemaker
I agree, Haye saw an opportunity to make a last big payday. I doubt he imagines himself he is likely to win against Joshua, but figures he's got a chance, and will earn a fortune doing so.samwbr wrote:The taller, stronger, younger, bigger hitting hungrier man wins this. If it happens. It's an obvious cash out for Haye, the only reason he came back, he isn't looking at a long career from here on in.
Re: Aj v hayemaker
jamesmcdonnell wrote:[
Wlad beat Haye with ease, using height and reach advantages, because unlike Valuev he wasn't as slow as poo through a funnel.
this depends on the circumstances and what you have been eating and drinking
HMMMM not been out with me a for bit Jimmy have ya?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Aj v hayemaker
No.....thank fornicate!! You back yet?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Aj v hayemaker
I'll make sure I've emigrated by then then.

Re: Aj v hayemaker
I'm sorry I was talking about boxers, not sure Valuev qualifies. Valuev challenges Martin for worst HW champ ever...ILikeBeer wrote:What definition of the word 'small' are you using, where Valuev can be claimed to be smaller than Haye?Rob3_142 wrote:This. Haye has a fabulous record of knocking underwhelming opposition into next Wednesday, but when has Haye really beaten anyone over 12 rounds that is a big puncher and bigger than him?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Haye will fight like AJ is carrying nitroglycerine in his protector. He's never won against a big punching heavyweight who is bigger than him.
Re: Aj v hayemaker
What happened to Haye v Briggs?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Aj v hayemaker
He hasn't proven it, that's what I'm saying, you can't fight rank 150+ ish Mark de Mori and rank 50 ish Gjergjaj and then ignore the rank 38 Shannon Briggs? Especially not if you promised it. There are so many people who bought the ticket of last fight because of Shannon Briggs and now Haye is walking away with that money? Briggs hasn't been proven wrong since he got injured.ILikeBeer wrote:asdfjkl wrote:A cruiserweight with a bunch of extra fat on his body isn't a dangerous boxer, simple as that. Let Haye fight Briggs and after that he might move on. Atm he hasn't proven to be any better as Briggs, Breazeale, or name them. Whyte would probably KO him by the first succesful hit.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You can question Haye's personality all you like, but to say the he isn't better than Shannon Briggs is an absurd statement. Or Breazeale.
That's like Arreola not giving up out of himself after Wilder couldn't continue any more and then nobody from the top 50 ever fighting Wilder ever again? What else can Briggs do as winning against whoever is in front of him if every high ranked person is too scared to fight him? Ortiz had the same problem for a very very long time and now he turns out to be good.