Richie Woodhall

Cholo_cws
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1904
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 16:19

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Cholo_cws »

Ketchel wrote:Bring back Jim Neilly. I miss his commentary..... a lot.
Actually what's happened to him? I'd been expecting him to share the commentary with McIntosh. I thought he was good too.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by ElJefe »

thechump wrote:
ElJefe wrote:How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games? :brick: :lol:
he doesnt want to sound too complicated to the casual fan tho does he? woodhall is the best british commentator around imo
The lad's name can't be that complicated!
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

Ketchel wrote:Bring back Jim Neilly. I miss his commentary..... a lot.
Join the club he did the rugger as well and famously called Christophe Domenici the French winger 'an eejit' for dropping the ball once he got over the try line.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Stuarty »

I like Woodhall he's spot on.

Big Ronnie 'SeaBiscuit' McIntosh is proper woeful! You could throw a saddle on him and charge the kids on Rio beach a quid a ride!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stuarty30 wrote:I like Woodhall he's spot on.

Big Ronnie 'SeaBiscuit' McIntosh is proper woeful! You could throw a saddle on him and charge the kids on Rio beach a quid a ride!
That's a year's wages in Rio! You could probably buy a horse for that, though not one each of whose teeth you could carve into an enamel wash-basin when it died.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Stuarty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I like Woodhall he's spot on.

Big Ronnie 'SeaBiscuit' McIntosh is proper woeful! You could throw a saddle on him and charge the kids on Rio beach a quid a ride!
That's a year's wages in Rio! You could probably buy a horse for that, though not each of whose teeth you could carve into an enamel wash-basin when it died.
He does have a fantastic set of tusks :bow: You could grind em up and snort them for a more potent erection :o
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stuarty30 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I like Woodhall he's spot on.

Big Ronnie 'SeaBiscuit' McIntosh is proper woeful! You could throw a saddle on him and charge the kids on Rio beach a quid a ride!
That's a year's wages in Rio! You could probably buy a horse for that, though not each of whose teeth you could carve into an enamel wash-basin when it died.
He does have a fantastic set of tusks :bow: You could grind em up and snort them for a more potent erection :o
He'd better watch out around the Chinese athletes, they'll have him de-fanged in short order.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Bodyshot3 »

I do rate Woodhall....gets nearly every call right and is objective enough to point out when a Brit is not performing well without going over the top on the faults...and Richie has been there himself having fought in Seoul and got an Olympic bronze. He's talking from experience.

Fair enough that not everyone likes him but overall I think the BBC would be hard pushed to find anyone better who is not on a Sky contract!
BrackaBarclay
Welterweight
Posts: 61
Joined: 22 Jul 2016, 17:25

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by BrackaBarclay »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I like Woodhall he's spot on.

Big Ronnie 'SeaBiscuit' McIntosh is proper woeful! You could throw a saddle on him and charge the kids on Rio beach a quid a ride!
That's a year's wages in Rio! You could probably buy a horse for that, though not one each of whose teeth you could carve into an enamel wash-basin when it died.
He's so bad, I feel sure Ron is some plant by a comedy channel trying to expose the BBC for ineptitude.

I swear you could get a high as a kite, illiterate street drug addict who had never watched a boxing match in his life to do a better job than Ron.... Someone posted a Ron quote tonight describing a boxers style as 'pendulous'? Very odd description from the King of malapropisms...and that's not even to mention how ugly he is or why he always decides it would help his commentary to insert a large handful of marbles into his mouth before he speaks....
aliboy123
Super Lightweight
Posts: 530
Joined: 27 Jul 2016, 08:33

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by aliboy123 »

Yeah I always thought Audley would be an excellent pundit. Maybe he just doesn't fancy it though, as I can't remember him ever even properly attempting it.[/quote]

"just doesn't fancy it" that's pretty much Harrison all over. what would he say if one of the fighters needed to be a bit more aggressive given that he himself would stay at a safe distance from any kind of ruck in the ring
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by TheGman »

ElJefe wrote:
thechump wrote:
ElJefe wrote:How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games? :brick: :lol:
he doesnt want to sound too complicated to the casual fan tho does he? woodhall is the best british commentator around imo
The lad's name can't be that complicated!
Depends what country he comes from
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by TheGman »

Bodyshot3 wrote:I do rate Woodhall....gets nearly every call right and is objective enough to point out when a Brit is not performing well without going over the top on the faults...and Richie has been there himself having fought in Seoul and got an Olympic bronze. He's talking from experience.

Fair enough that not everyone likes him but overall I think the BBC would be hard pushed to find anyone better who is not on a Sky contract!
I think the bbc would hard pushed to find anyone better who is on a sky contract too,woodhall is the best commentator from these shores imo
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by MightyWarrior »

Richie "without a shadow of a doubt" Woodhall


Not exactly rivetIng to listen to but is no bullshit & knows his stuff obviously
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

MightyWarrior wrote:Richie "without a shadow of a doubt" Woodhall


Not exactly rivetIng to listen to but is no bullshit & knows his stuff obviously
I think the only real criticism of Woodhall is this, his voice and intonation are very drony and flat, makes him sound a bit like a moany teenager.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by orbtastic »

"Believe you me"
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

orbtastic wrote:"Believe you me"
"are we nearly there yet mam, I'm bored."
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23027
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by mickey1975 »

"Holding his feet "
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
orbtastic wrote:"Believe you me"
"are we nearly there yet mam, I'm bored."
It would be mom, not mam. :TU:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Counter-puncher wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
orbtastic wrote:"Believe you me"
"are we nearly there yet mam, I'm bored."
It would be mom, not mam. :TU:
Would it, I want evidence of how a brummie pronounces it.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by TerribleTerry »

mickey1975 wrote:"Holding his feet "
"He's holding his feet and throwing bent arm shots"... A recipe for disaster in Woodhall's world :stop:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
"are we nearly there yet mam, I'm bored."
It would be mom, not mam. :TU:
Would it, I want evidence of how a brummie pronounces it.
If a brummie telling you isn't enough I fear you're setting your burden of proof rather too high
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Counter-puncher wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
It would be mom, not mam. :TU:
Would it, I want evidence of how a brummie pronounces it.
If a brummie telling you isn't enough I fear you're setting your burden of proof rather too high
Brummie's = infamous liars.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

:lol:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Counter-puncher wrote::lol:

:TU:
Tarquin Tarpaulin IV
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 461
Joined: 26 Mar 2005, 20:02

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Tarquin Tarpaulin IV »

Richie is repetitive, range, range, distance, range, closer, outside, range, nearer, closer feet, quicker feet, hold his feet, range, range, range.

How about piping down for 10 seconds?


Awful, awful, range, awful..........
Post Reply