Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Hiw can you say that without pissing your pants with laughter in an era where a fat flabby slob like Tyson Fury is the champion??
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Slob? He's not the best looking but his fitness is actually very good, he can quite happilly go 12 rounds. And other than recent fighters like Lennox Lewis I have serious doubts about any of the past greats against a prime Wlad.Ricky_ wrote:asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Hiw can you say that without pissing your pants with laughter in an era where a fat flabby slob like Tyson Fury is the champion??
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
BitPlayer wrote:Slob? He's not the best looking but his fitness is actually very good, he can quite happilly go 12 rounds. And other than recent fighters like Lennox Lewis I have serious doubts about any of the past greats against a prime Wlad.Ricky_ wrote:asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Hiw can you say that without pissing your pants with laughter in an era where a fat flabby slob like Tyson Fury is the champion??
How do the past greats get on against Sanders? Or Cunningham?
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Fury is no slob 
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
He's a fat disgusting slob that's 1 level up from Valuev.Oiky wrote:Fury is no slob
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
The slob in actionRicky_ wrote:He's a fat disgusting slob that's 1 level up from Valuev.Oiky wrote:Fury is no slob
https://zippy.gfycat.com/ValuableColorlessBarnowl.webm
https://gfycat.com/AggressiveOldfashion ... alaboriosa
https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpWhimsicalDeer.webm
https://fat.gfycat.com/WaterloggedJovia ... aurus.webm
He's ugly, flabby, a spoiler, and not a big puncher for a top heavyweight, but he's far from a slob.
No slob can dance and slip for 12, Fury can.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9011
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Wladimir must be upset that it is not him dictating terms & deciding when & where fights happen.Boxerbeetle wrote:Interesting. Wlad mentions the Fury camp are trying to change the terms of the already signed contract - wonder what he's referring to?
He's had a decade of being the man & now he just another challenger who has to dance to the champion's tune, just like all the guys he's fought in the last 10 years.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
I'd have picked Ali and Holmes over Wlad any day, he'd never have been able to dominate either of them with the jab, and they both threw a hell of a lot more shots. The reason has been so dominant for so long, is people didn't give him angles, or lacked the physical tools to really compete. Foreman would have had the strength and persistence to wear him down. Some of the other guys like Liston who weren't that quick, might have struggled due to their size.BitPlayer wrote:Slob? He's not the best looking but his fitness is actually very good, he can quite happilly go 12 rounds. And other than recent fighters like Lennox Lewis I have serious doubts about any of the past greats against a prime Wlad.Ricky_ wrote:asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Hiw can you say that without pissing your pants with laughter in an era where a fat flabby slob like Tyson Fury is the champion??
Tyson would probably have gotten Wlad out of there before he could settle into his monotonous jab jab right cross, he'd have slipped under and hit him hard. I can't see Wlad surviving the early onslaught. too tentative and mentally brittle.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
The 12 stone Henry Cooper dropped Ali far harder. Tyson, like Ali, improved though.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
People said the same about him fighting Wlad, but Fury took his shots.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Fury never took any of Wlad's shots. He was on his bike for 12 rounds in the worst HW fight ever involving a couple of belts.BitPlayer wrote:The 12 stone Henry Cooper dropped Ali far harder. Tyson, like Ali, improved though.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
People said the same about him fighting Wlad, but Fury took his shots.
Seriously this idea that slob Fury is even close to some kind of ATG deserve complete ridicule.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Cooper wasn't 12 stone, cooper was 13 stone 2 when he fought Ali the 1st time,.BitPlayer wrote:The 12 stone Henry Cooper dropped Ali far harder. Tyson, like Ali, improved though.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
People said the same about him fighting Wlad, but Fury took his shots.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
I looked it up, he estimated 12st 12. he used weights to make himself heavierjamesmcdonnell wrote:Cooper wasn't 12 stone, cooper was 13 stone 2 when he fought Ali the 1st time,.BitPlayer wrote:The 12 stone Henry Cooper dropped Ali far harder. Tyson, like Ali, improved though.Ricky_ wrote:
Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.
People said the same about him fighting Wlad, but Fury took his shots.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Really? well, that's still nearer 13 than 12 though, 12 is 168, which is under super middleweight limit.BitPlayer wrote:I looked it up, he estimated 12st 12. he used weights to make himself heavierjamesmcdonnell wrote:Cooper wasn't 12 stone, cooper was 13 stone 2 when he fought Ali the 1st time,.BitPlayer wrote: The 12 stone Henry Cooper dropped Ali far harder. Tyson, like Ali, improved though.
People said the same about him fighting Wlad, but Fury took his shots.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
He can go 12 rounds throwing 10 punches a round. He'd die in a pace like Weaver/Coetzee, though both of them would knock him cold before he got tired. When was Wlad's prime?BitPlayer wrote:Slob? He's not the best looking but his fitness is actually very good, he can quite happilly go 12 rounds. And other than recent fighters like Lennox Lewis I have serious doubts about any of the past greats against a prime Wlad.Ricky_ wrote:asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
Hiw can you say that without pissing your pants with laughter in an era where a fat flabby slob like Tyson Fury is the champion??
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
yet he's the heavyweight champion of the world like he or anyone else cares about people on a forum online calling him a slobBitPlayer wrote:The slob in actionRicky_ wrote:He's a fat disgusting slob that's 1 level up from Valuev.Oiky wrote:Fury is no slob
https://zippy.gfycat.com/ValuableColorlessBarnowl.webm
https://gfycat.com/AggressiveOldfashion ... alaboriosa
https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpWhimsicalDeer.webm
https://fat.gfycat.com/WaterloggedJovia ... aurus.webm
He's ugly, flabby, a spoiler, and not a big puncher for a top heavyweight, but he's far from a slob.
No slob can dance and slip for 12, Fury can.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Oiky wrote:yet he's the heavyweight champion of the world like he or anyone else cares about people on a forum online calling him a slobBitPlayer wrote:The slob in actionRicky_ wrote:
He's a fat disgusting slob that's 1 level up from Valuev.
https://zippy.gfycat.com/ValuableColorlessBarnowl.webm
https://gfycat.com/AggressiveOldfashion ... alaboriosa
https://giant.gfycat.com/LimpWhimsicalDeer.webm
https://fat.gfycat.com/WaterloggedJovia ... aurus.webm
He's ugly, flabby, a spoiler, and not a big puncher for a top heavyweight, but he's far from a slob.
No slob can dance and slip for 12, Fury can.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at there? Looks like a giant fat slob leaning forward to me?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Tyson is smaller as any top 100 boxrec heavyweight boxer of nowadays, Ali is similar muscled, similar speed, less range and less height. Tyson is basically the modern and UK version of Ali, just like Ali, Fury isn't even that popular at this moment of his carreer.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
Briggs is similar to Foreman in some way, old, but good chin and Powerful. There's a reason most higher, but experienced boxers are scared of him.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
I actually had to check.asdfjkl wrote:Tyson is smaller as any top 100 boxrec heavyweight boxer of nowadays, Ali is similar muscled, similar speed, less range and less height. Tyson is basically the modern and UK version of Ali, just like Ali, Fury isn't even that popular at this moment of his carreer.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
Briggs is similar to Foreman in some way, old, but good chin and Powerful. There's a reason most higher, but experienced boxers are scared of him.
http://boxrec.com/boxer/512687 This guy is 5'10" ranked 80
I didn't check them all but he was the shortest I found.
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
asdfjkl wrote:Tyson is smaller as any top 100 boxrec heavyweight boxer of nowadays, Ali is similar muscled, similar speed, less range and less height. Tyson is basically the modern and UK version of Ali, just like Ali, Fury isn't even that popular at this moment of his carreer.Ricky_ wrote:Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.Heretic wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb9PU0x79_8
Cunningham is pretty much just the same size as Ali. He looks tiny when getting manhandled by Fury
Briggs is similar to Foreman in some way, old, but good chin and Powerful. There's a reason most higher, but experienced boxers are scared of him.
Not making any sense of this. Are you saying Mike Tyson would have been too small to beat Fury?
Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
So likes of John Ruin, who had WBA title for 3-4 in early 2000s is "far superior" to likes of Foreman who was in his prime around '73.asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
If true how come a 45 year old Foreman won WBA and IBF titles in early 90s.
Povetkin is 6ft 2. Same as Holyfield who beat Bowe, and more than hung with giants like Lewis and Valuev.
I'm not a big Tyson fan, but are we saying he wouldn't beat Wad.... or <gulps> Fury
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Yes I do, you have to be so extremely good skilled to beat someone with a 14 inch reach advantage, it's nearly impossible.Ricky_ wrote:asdfjkl wrote:Tyson is smaller as any top 100 boxrec heavyweight boxer of nowadays, Ali is similar muscled, similar speed, less range and less height. Tyson is basically the modern and UK version of Ali, just like Ali, Fury isn't even that popular at this moment of his carreer.Ricky_ wrote:
Cunningam put Fury flat on his back. You people are circus clowns if you think slob Fury could beat a guy like Tyson Ali or Foreman.
Briggs is similar to Foreman in some way, old, but good chin and Powerful. There's a reason most higher, but experienced boxers are scared of him.
Not making any sense of this. Are you saying Mike Tyson would have been too small to beat Fury?
Even Mayweather got an advantage in reach above Tyson.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Ducker Fury is ducking Wlad rematch
Oh, come on, Ruiz only had 7 opponends that were actually known by wikipedia in his first 40 matches and lost most of them. You can't really consider that as a top contender. Even David Haye, with his paper wins won against him. WBA winners just usually look for a lot of bums to fight, so they can keep their belt. They aren't actually good. Ruiz is just another example of that.Wales wrote:So likes of John Ruin, who had WBA title for 3-4 in early 2000s is "far superior" to likes of Foreman who was in his prime around '73.asdfjkl wrote:I think it's fair to say that the heavyweights of nowadays are far superior compared to the ones of 25 and more years ago.
Muhammad Ali wouldn't even have been a heavyweight all the time and barely any of his opponends were either. The ones that were clearly showed to be more competative.
The sport simply develops over time. Mike tyson is 3 inches shorter as Povetkin, who's already considered quite short for nowadays top level heavyweights standards.
If true how come a 45 year old Foreman won WBA and IBF titles in early 90s.
Povetkin is 6ft 2. Same as Holyfield who beat Bowe, and more than hung with giants like Lewis and Valuev.
I'm not a big Tyson fan, but are we saying he wouldn't beat Wad.... or <gulps> Fury
He might have had a chance against the previous generation, but not in modern.