Would be a competitive fight.TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Wouldn't mind seeing Kell fight Canelo.
Brook vs GGG card round by round
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
lol poor old Willard's injury was slightly worse than Brook's.keithmoonhangover wrote:I told Mrs Hangover it was the eye socket, like Dempsey against Willard. She agreed. I love that my woman knows more about Jack Dempsey than most boxing fans.Loynesy wrote:Most of the folks near me winced when it landed. I thought it was just a cheekbone. My old man immediately said "serious".keithmoonhangover wrote:Anyone else call the injury when t happened?
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
i don't see why golovkins punches wouldn't have had the same effect on a middleweight version of kell, its not as if being naturally bigger would help brook do a better job of avoiding them.Tuan_Jim wrote:The middles GGG's been squashing are second raters. Brook is a first rater, but a welter.mike john wrote:i take issue carl froch and anyone else saying "if brook were a middleweight" it would be a different story etc. has golovkin not been doing dishing out beatings like this to middleweights for years then?
confidently stating that the outcome would be different if kell were a middleweight is laughable
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
You might have if he had to torture himself to get down to 160 the way Kell did for 147 and not be 5lbs from weight 30 days out.lefty wrote: Am I salty? No, it's just a fact. You wouldn't see Golovkin moving up to 175 to fight Ward like Brook moved up to 160 to fight GGG.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Why? Because he got his arse reamed?ThereByTheGrace wrote:Brook is an utter fanny!
A welterweight titlist against the best middleweight in the world was only going to end one way. Love to know how many suckers paid Fast Eddie and Sky for this.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
The size difference was noticeable in the ring tonight though.Shirow wrote:You might have if he had to torture himself to get down to 160 the way Kell did for 147 and not be 5lbs from weight 30 days out.lefty wrote: Am I salty? No, it's just a fact. You wouldn't see Golovkin moving up to 175 to fight Ward like Brook moved up to 160 to fight GGG.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Yes.skanksta wrote:Paulie makes a good point there - 154lbs has the most talent and the smallest purses.
Better to lose to GGG and be a hero than the (to casuals) 'unknowns' like Landy, Boo-Boo Andrade etc.
It's got to be cash out vs Khan - @ catch weight ?
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Just because YOU CAN do something doesn't mean you should.lefty wrote:Well brook didn't need to either but he did. Also Golovkin is supposed to be this monster who beat up Kovalev in sparring- surely he's good enough to do it?gilgamesh wrote:Because GGG is a Middleweight and that's his best fighting weight. Why should he move up in weight?lefty wrote: Am I salty? No, it's just a fact. You wouldn't see Golovkin moving up to 175 to fight Ward like Brook moved up to 160 to fight GGG.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
I could see GGG walking through Ward
Defo a 50/50 imo
Defo a 50/50 imo
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
If you don't understand how being a naturally smaller man can hinders one's ability to absorb the punches of a larger man then you are a lost cause.mike john wrote:i don't see why golovkins punches wouldn't have had the same effect on a middleweight version of kell, its not as if being naturally bigger would help brook do a better job of avoiding them.Tuan_Jim wrote:The middles GGG's been squashing are second raters. Brook is a first rater, but a welter.mike john wrote:i take issue carl froch and anyone else saying "if brook were a middleweight" it would be a different story etc. has golovkin not been doing dishing out beatings like this to middleweights for years then?
confidently stating that the outcome would be different if kell were a middleweight is laughable
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
WTF are you on? Cash out? He's got one loss to his name FFS. Why the hell would he cash out? Utter balls.skanksta wrote:Paulie makes a good point there - 154lbs has the most talent and the smallest purses.
Better to lose to GGG and be a hero than the (to casuals) 'unknowns' like Landy, Boo-Boo Andrade etc.
It's got to be cash out vs Khan - @ catch weight ?
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Just like he wouldn't go to 168 to fight Ward when he was competing at the weight but he would go to 168 to fight anyone else at that weight class.gilgamesh wrote:Just because YOU CAN do something doesn't mean you should.lefty wrote:Well brook didn't need to either but he did. Also Golovkin is supposed to be this monster who beat up Kovalev in sparring- surely he's good enough to do it?gilgamesh wrote:
Because GGG is a Middleweight and that's his best fighting weight. Why should he move up in weight?
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
BTW I'm surprised so many here gave Brook the round in which his eye was busted. GGG did by far the most damage and was landing well with the left that round...
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
So Brook has a suspected fractured eye socket because he's normally a welterweight? What the fvck are you on?Tuan_Jim wrote:If you don't understand how being a naturally smaller man can hinders one's ability to absorb the punches of a larger man then you are a lost cause.mike john wrote:i don't see why golovkins punches wouldn't have had the same effect on a middleweight version of kell, its not as if being naturally bigger would help brook do a better job of avoiding them.Tuan_Jim wrote:
The middles GGG's been squashing are second raters. Brook is a first rater, but a welter.
confidently stating that the outcome would be different if kell were a middleweight is laughable
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
I gave Brook that roundcrusader wrote:BTW I'm surprised so many here gave Brook the round in which his eye was busted. GGG did by far the most damage and was landing well with the left that round...
Depends what you like, volume or damage
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
So? It wasn't ever a fight I had much interest in anyway. I'm perfectly content with GGG fighting as a Middleweight for his entire career. So many guys have done the weight class jumping thing that fans have come to think it's something you have to do. It's not.lefty wrote:Just like he wouldn't go to 168 to fight Ward when he was competing at the weight but he would go to 168 to fight anyone else at that weight class.gilgamesh wrote:Just because YOU CAN do something doesn't mean you should.lefty wrote: Well brook didn't need to either but he did. Also Golovkin is supposed to be this monster who beat up Kovalev in sparring- surely he's good enough to do it?
-
Switch hitter
- Middleweight
- Posts: 590
- Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Got to say though he took GGG shots well....
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
As soon as you park the subjective desire to frame the Brit fighter in the best light possible it becomes a fairly routine GGG defence - by the end of the fight he looked like he'd been in a sparring session and in his own mild-mannered fashion he explained Brook clearly wasn't a Middleweight i.e. he felt in complete control and able to walk him down. I think he tried to walk through him at first and underestimated Kell's skill and willingness to trade, but while I thought Brook showed great heart and some slick moves, did anyone honestly feel that at any point it was anything more than just a matter of time? As others have said, as soon as GGG settled down into a constant stalk you felt a sense of inevitability about it.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
His eye didn'tSwitch hitter wrote:Got to say though he took GGG shots well....
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Not what you seem to be discussing. Run along Keith, I'm not interested in anything you have to say.keithmoonhangover wrote:So Brook has a suspected fractured eye socket because he's normally a welterweight? What the fvck are you on?Tuan_Jim wrote:If you don't understand how being a naturally smaller man can hinders one's ability to absorb the punches of a larger man then you are a lost cause.mike john wrote:
i don't see why golovkins punches wouldn't have had the same effect on a middleweight version of kell, its not as if being naturally bigger would help brook do a better job of avoiding them.
confidently stating that the outcome would be different if kell were a middleweight is laughable
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
Because the current middleweight division is full of B and C class fighters. It's a weak division right now.gilgamesh wrote:So? It wasn't ever a fight I had much interest in anyway. I'm perfectly content with GGG fighting as a Middleweight for his entire career. So many guys have done the weight class jumping thing that fans have come to think it's something you have to do. It's not.lefty wrote:Just like he wouldn't go to 168 to fight Ward when he was competing at the weight but he would go to 168 to fight anyone else at that weight class.gilgamesh wrote:
Just because YOU CAN do something doesn't mean you should.
Last edited by lefty on 10 Sep 2016, 19:06, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
I can't stand it.gilgamesh wrote:So? It wasn't ever a fight I had much interest in anyway. I'm perfectly content with GGG fighting as a Middleweight for his entire career. So many guys have done the weight class jumping thing that fans have come to think it's something you have to do. It's not.
Golovkin should only move up if he completely cleans house at middleweight. Which he's nowhere near done so far.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
100% agree. It never did Hagler any harm.gilgamesh wrote:So? It wasn't ever a fight I had much interest in anyway. I'm perfectly content with GGG fighting as a Middleweight for his entire career. So many guys have done the weight class jumping thing that fans have come to think it's something you have to do. It's not.
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
This, just a matter of timeDeserter wrote:As soon as you park the subjective desire to frame the Brit fighter in the best light possible it becomes a fairly routine GGG defence - by the end of the fight he looked like he'd been in a sparring session and in his own mild-mannered fashion he explained Brook clearly wasn't a Middleweight i.e. he felt in complete control and able to walk him down. I think he tried to walk through him at first and underestimated Kell's skill and willingness to trade, but while I thought Brook showed great heart and some slick moves, did anyone honestly feel that at any point it was anything more than just a matter of time? As others have said, as soon as GGG settled down into a constant stalk you felt a sense of inevitability about it.
Khan was probably beating canelo at the time of ko, but less expected
Re: Brook vs GGG card round by round
lefty wrote:That's gil you plonker.rd350lc wrote:too much ale lefty ?gilgamesh wrote:
I thought GGG looked a bit buzzed from that uppercut in the 2nd