EDWARD HEARN

Floydendizer
Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 17 Jul 2016, 11:03

EDWARD HEARN

Post by Floydendizer »

Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Horse »

Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
His fighters did fine.

Hearn won't be too unhappy.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by samwbr »

Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
You'd rather see knockovers for the house fighters then.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by rd350lc »

If anything Brook will raise his stock with that showing .
Floydendizer
Welterweight
Posts: 204
Joined: 17 Jul 2016, 11:03

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Floydendizer »

That's the point were used to seeing knock over jobs .
RJP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 139
Joined: 05 Dec 2008, 15:35

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by RJP »

rd350lc wrote:If anything Brook will raise his stock with that showing .
100%. He's gone from being a bloke who couldn't fill a church hall to a marquee fighter and national hero.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by samwbr »

rd350lc wrote:If anything Brook will raise his stock with that showing .
Yep. Was always going to, he's game as fornicate and talented. Loads of opportunities for him.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
Nonsense. Hearn would have known from the beginning that those fighters were all unlikely to win. He should get credit for making the fights in the first place.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by rd350lc »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
Nonsense. Hearn would have known from the beginning that those fighters were all unlikely to win. He should get credit for making the fights in the first place.
Yes , he takes enough stick , so fair play.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by lefty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
Nonsense. Hearn would have known from the beginning that those fighters were all unlikely to win. He should get credit for making the fights in the first place.
True although it was either move up to 160 and fight Golovkin and get a big payday; but an inevitable beating- OR stay at welterweight and fight your mandatory Spence jnr, and possibly lose, and also maybe get stopped, and probably not make much money in the process. I thought Brook performed well tonight though and put on an admirable display.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by BitPlayer »

You're complaining that Hearn isn't putting his guys in easy enough fights.
bbjc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 05:39

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by bbjc »

Never fully rated brook...but changed my opinion completely tonite. Actually thought he could have won that fight tonite. Golovkin is full in at all times brooks pushes him back he would have won it. Eubanks know how to do it.

Fancy him big time to beat golvokin. Whos a tremendous fighter but with big weaknesses. Stamina for one.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by crusader »

bbjc wrote:Never fully rated brook...but changed my opinion completely tonite. Actually thought he could have won that fight tonite. Golovkin is full in at all times brooks pushes him back he would have won it. Eubanks know how to do it.

Fancy him big time to beat golvokin. Whos a tremendous fighter but with big weaknesses. Stamina for one.
Why do you think stamina is a big weakness of GGG's? I've never seen him seriously gassed and he puts a lot into his shots.

Why so confident that Eubank wins that? Jr. has faced one top ten opponent and he lost....it's one thing to look good against British level guys like O'Sullivan, but another beat P4P level fighters like Golovkin. That said, one thing Eubank Jr. has going for him is those combinations, as I think GGG's looked most vulnerable when opponents stand their ground and let their shots go in bunches.
Last edited by crusader on 10 Sep 2016, 22:58, edited 1 time in total.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Wales »

samwbr wrote:
Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .
You'd rather see knockovers for the house fighters then.
Complain when Brook fights Brazier, Dan and Gavin. Complain when he fights GGG. Dare to be great I say.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by crusader »

I like to see fighters challenge themselves, although I did think it was a bit odd that a tyro like Edwards (turned pro last year!) was matched with a very experienced and proven world class fighter in Casimero. For me that definitely fits the category of being injudiciously rushed into a fight
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by TheLeprechaun »

crusader wrote:
bbjc wrote:Never fully rated brook...but changed my opinion completely tonite. Actually thought he could have won that fight tonite. Golovkin is full in at all times brooks pushes him back he would have won it. Eubanks know how to do it.

Fancy him big time to beat golvokin. Whos a tremendous fighter but with big weaknesses. Stamina for one.
Why do you think stamina is a big weakness of GGG's? I've never seen him seriously gassed and he puts a lot into his shots.

Why so confident that Eubank wins that? Jr. has faced one top ten opponent and he lost....it's one thing to look good against British level guys like O'Sullivan, but another beat P4P level fighters like Golovkin. That said, one thing Eubank Jr. has going for him is those combinations, as I think GGG's looked most vulnerable when opponents stand their ground and let their shots go in bunches.

I don't see anything wrong with Triple G's stamina myself. Not yet anyway. He fights in such a high octane way. His opponents are going to need serious stamina because he is on them every second of every round and they can't afford to let him tee off.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Syntax Error »

RJP wrote:
rd350lc wrote:If anything Brook will raise his stock with that showing .
100%. He's gone from being a bloke who couldn't fill a church hall to a marquee fighter and national hero.
Isn't sad that Brook had to get his arse busted in order to be appreciated for being a good fighter? :verysad:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Autobarn »

I thought Brook could've been a star at welter.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Cyclops »

RJP wrote:
rd350lc wrote:If anything Brook will raise his stock with that showing .
100%. He's gone from being a bloke who couldn't fill a church hall to a marquee fighter and national hero.
x2. Nobody lost really last night. Despite all the criticism you could level at it I think last night was brilliant for both boxers' careers and brilliant for boxing in the UK in general. It's easy to be negative and a lot of the time is justified in this sport but a lot of good will come of that fight last night.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by Syntax Error »

Autobarn wrote:I thought Brook could've been a star at welter.
Me too.

It's all the more disappointing that he has feasted on horse sh!t for the last two years in a division that is stacked.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3225
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by smiling assassin »

bbjc wrote:Never fully rated brook...but changed my opinion completely tonite. Actually thought he could have won that fight tonite. Golovkin is full in at all times brooks pushes him back he would have won it. Eubanks know how to do it.

Fancy him big time to beat golvokin. Whos a tremendous fighter but with big weaknesses. Stamina for one.
Eubank will get battered. He ain't quick with his feet like brook nor has he got the boxing skills like him. If Eubank stays in front of Golovkin he will get battered. Golovkin gets caught a lot but his chin is granite and Eubank is not a banger. Easy nights work for GGG
bbjc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 20 Dec 2007, 05:39

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by bbjc »

TheLeprechaun wrote:
crusader wrote:
bbjc wrote:Never fully rated brook...but changed my opinion completely tonite. Actually thought he could have won that fight tonite. Golovkin is full in at all times brooks pushes him back he would have won it. Eubanks know how to do it.

Fancy him big time to beat golvokin. Whos a tremendous fighter but with big weaknesses. Stamina for one.
Why do you think stamina is a big weakness of GGG's? I've never seen him seriously gassed and he puts a lot into his shots.

Why so confident that Eubank wins that? Jr. has faced one top ten opponent and he lost....it's one thing to look good against British level guys like O'Sullivan, but another beat P4P level fighters like Golovkin. That said, one thing Eubank Jr. has going for him is those combinations, as I think GGG's looked most vulnerable when opponents stand their ground and let their shots go in bunches.

I don't see anything wrong with Triple G's stamina myself. Not yet anyway. He fights in such a high octane way. His opponents are going to need serious stamina because he is on them every second of every round and they can't afford to let him tee off.

The problem with golvokin is hes all in most of the time. Except for the brief breathers he takes. Hes getting older. Its not the his stamina is bad its that he excerts himself too much and is a sitting duck when the pace slows. His style of fightings suits a younger man. Eubanks will beat him a year from now
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by davie »

Floydendizer wrote:Think it's come to the point where Eddie needs help,constantly brainwashing himself tonight 3 world title losers , got to be the worst sky show ever for results for matchroom. Thought he would have learned his lesson after the Quigg show but obviously not Brook was never going to win tonight , Eddie was living in DREAMLAND .

I agree, Hearn should just set up cards full of fights where his guys are guaranteed to win and not be challenged or take on the best
:doh:
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2177
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by tony1234 »

I would've thought he was most satisfied with last nights proceeds, a full O2 and umpteen PPV buys. Brook can get a mega fight against Khan next year and the other 2 were never top of his attractions
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: EDWARD HEARN

Post by TheLeprechaun »

bbjc wrote:
TheLeprechaun wrote:
crusader wrote:
Why do you think stamina is a big weakness of GGG's? I've never seen him seriously gassed and he puts a lot into his shots.

Why so confident that Eubank wins that? Jr. has faced one top ten opponent and he lost....it's one thing to look good against British level guys like O'Sullivan, but another beat P4P level fighters like Golovkin. That said, one thing Eubank Jr. has going for him is those combinations, as I think GGG's looked most vulnerable when opponents stand their ground and let their shots go in bunches.

I don't see anything wrong with Triple G's stamina myself. Not yet anyway. He fights in such a high octane way. His opponents are going to need serious stamina because he is on them every second of every round and they can't afford to let him tee off.

The problem with golvokin is hes all in most of the time. Except for the brief breathers he takes. Hes getting older. Its not the his stamina is bad its that he excerts himself too much and is a sitting duck when the pace slows. His style of fightings suits a younger man. Eubanks will beat him a year from now


Good points, he's 34 now, although he looks 10 years younger. Hasn't really been in a hard fight but he has shipped a few shots here and there. I'd start worrying about his stamina when he hits 37+.

I think the thing about last night was that he could see the effect his punches were having and he felt that Brooks power wasn't really troubling him that much so he was right up on Brook all night. He fought that way because he had the strength, chin and power advantages. He's been more reserved and conservative in other fights. You wouldn't see him employing the same tactics against bigger punchers. I mean, he does that vs someone like Julian Jackson or McClellan and he'd be sparked out within 30 seconds.
Post Reply