Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post Reply
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by Like a Boss »

Image
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Brook winning the first is insane. He was very competetive in the 3rd and 4th and clearly won the second. Not that I understand so many people worrying about cards that didn't matter.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by crusader »

I agree...Brook winning the first is mental (although I've been told otherwise in the Brit section by Horse and someone from Brook's gym :lol: )
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by Like a Boss »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Brook winning the first is insane. He was very competetive in the 3rd and 4th and clearly won the second. Not that I understand so many people worrying about cards that didn't matter.
I have been reading everywhere since the fight finished about how "Brook was up on the cards."

The reality is only one judge had Brook ahead, and GGG made the cards about as relevant as yesterday's fish and chip paper by stopping Brook in the 5th.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by crusader »

I think that stems from Eddie Hearn saying on TV that the judges had Brook up...obviously not though.
twlyall
Super Lightweight
Posts: 41
Joined: 28 Jul 2016, 04:22

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by twlyall »

Shocking cards to best honest. TWO judges gave the first round to Brook. How that's even possible, I dont know. Two judges giving the fourth for Brook is not as shocking – albeit rather surprising in my view. Having watched the fight three times now – once with Sky-commentators, once with the HBO-commentators and once with no sound, I believe my first impression was the right one: Golovkin ahead 3-1 before the fifth.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by Counter-puncher »

Judges clearly scoring on crowd noise.
Escorpioza
Welterweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 27 Aug 2015, 08:18

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by Escorpioza »

LOL how can you give the first round to Brook... he was even wobbled and almost went down .. corrupt judges
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Was there a different 1st round because the 1st round I watched Brook got rocked and hurt in that round you cannot give to him :doh: I also seen a clean knock down that wasn't awarded either fuc these type of idiot judge's that listen to the crowd's roar instead of doing a professional job do my head in get rid of these imposter's :oops:
lazboy
Welterweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Only one judge had Brook ahead - here's the scorecard

Post by lazboy »

This is so disgusting. You really take a big risk fighting in the UK if your not a favorite. There's been at least three significant fights I've watched in the last couple of months where the judging has been blatantly biased.

1 GGG-Brook
2 Josh Warrington - Hishashi Amagasa
3 The worst offender of them all Craig Kennedy - Joel (Big Joe) Djeko
Post Reply