Eubank V Langford off?
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Eubank V Langford off?
Just read eubank v Langford is off and eubank vacated the title can anyone confirm this ?
And if so does eubank have anything lined up or is it just because he's mental?
And if so does eubank have anything lined up or is it just because he's mental?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
I just read that on Twitter. The Eubanks are disrespectful pricks.
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
I go with just mental - must have a better offer , Saunders 2 ????????????
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Where did you read this!? all i find online is about Langford vacating his intercont title?craigjenkins05 wrote:Just read eubank v Langford is off and eubank vacated the title can anyone confirm this ?
And if so does eubank have anything lined up or is it just because he's mental?
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
My brother just sent me a screenshot off twitter not sure how reliable it is though? But Iv seen FW heartening to dock them £25,000 in a few IFLTV interviews and he's also got eubank snr's estranged son on the card so doubt that would have gone down wellno1man wrote:Where did you read this!? all i find online is about Langford vacating his intercont title?craigjenkins05 wrote:Just read eubank v Langford is off and eubank vacated the title can anyone confirm this ?
And if so does eubank have anything lined up or is it just because he's mental?
Last edited by craigjenkins05 on 17 Sep 2016, 13:14, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
http://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2016/09/ ... fight-off/
Apparently Eubank Jr has vacated the British title out of safety concerns for those that would be challenging him for it, d̶e̶f̶i̶n̶i̶t̶e̶l̶y̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶h̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶d̶o̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶b̶o̶a̶r̶d̶ ̶f̶i̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶t̶u̶r̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶u̶p̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶t̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶L̶a̶n̶g̶f̶o̶r̶d̶ ̶f̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ .
Bring on Golovkin!!!
Apparently Eubank Jr has vacated the British title out of safety concerns for those that would be challenging him for it, d̶e̶f̶i̶n̶i̶t̶e̶l̶y̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶h̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶d̶o̶ ̶w̶i̶t̶h̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶b̶o̶a̶r̶d̶ ̶f̶i̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶h̶i̶m̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶t̶u̶r̶n̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶u̶p̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶t̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶L̶a̶n̶g̶f̶o̶r̶d̶ ̶f̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ .
Bring on Golovkin!!!
Last edited by aley135 on 17 Sep 2016, 13:22, edited 1 time in total.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Fight is off, Eubank sighting an injury and the fact that he wants to keep the title active and allow other boxers a chance to earn a living.
Also some gaff about how the gap between him and the other middleweight contenders is so vast.
Press conference in the coming weeks apparently about his plans, Injury is an Elbow apparently.
Also some gaff about how the gap between him and the other middleweight contenders is so vast.
Press conference in the coming weeks apparently about his plans, Injury is an Elbow apparently.
-
chrisnew86
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 472
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
He is better than British level. Hopefully see him inagainst someone who will test him properGlobalBox wrote:Fight is off, Eubank sighting an injury and the fact that he wants to keep the title active and allow other boxers a chance to earn a living.
Also some gaff about how the gap between him and the other middleweight contenders is so vast.
Press conference in the coming weeks apparently about his plans, Injury is an Elbow apparently.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
I know there's little chance but would love to see Jacobs V eubank
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Allegedly will be fuming..again..
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Wonder if its got anything to do with a certain Nathaniel Wilson being signed and added to the bill... Any guesses on who langford will get next? Ryder possibly
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
More to this than being painted but it's quite a mad press release. Funny really.
-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Eubank Jnr’s management team have advised that, in their opinion, there has not been a fighter in the history of British Boxing who has had such a vast chasm of fighting prowess between him and the contenders for the British Championship in ability, speed, strength, accuracy and skill since its inauguration by the Marquess of Queensbury in the 1800’s.
I had to check this was real, and not some fake press release sent to WBN and taken as real, then published.
I had to check this was real, and not some fake press release sent to WBN and taken as real, then published.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23227
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
thepocketrocket wrote:Eubank Jnr’s management team have advised that, in their opinion, there has not been a fighter in the history of British Boxing who has had such a vast chasm of fighting prowess between him and the contenders for the British Championship in ability, speed, strength, accuracy and skill since its inauguration by the Marquess of Queensbury in the 1800’s.
I had to check this was real, and not some fake press release sent to WBN and taken as real, then published.
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Not only arragant, but it's not even impressive, all that means is that no one else that level choose to take such easy fights.thepocketrocket wrote:Eubank Jnr’s management team have advised that, in their opinion, there has not been a fighter in the history of British Boxing who has had such a vast chasm of fighting prowess between him and the contenders for the British Championship in ability, speed, strength, accuracy and skill since its inauguration by the Marquess of Queensbury in the 1800’s.
I had to check this was real, and not some fake press release sent to WBN and taken as real, then published.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
I'm going to be a bit miffed that Eubank v Langford isn't going to be on the 22nd October bill, I got tickets for it partly because I wanted to see Eubank Jr live as he's always entertaining if nothing else.
Anyone know why he was so insistent on going the British title route, then immediately declaring he's too far above British level to actually defend it? Fvcking jokers.
Anyone know why he was so insistent on going the British title route, then immediately declaring he's too far above British level to actually defend it? Fvcking jokers.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Enough's enough.
Eddie, Frank and Hennesey should just blackball the arrogant pudenda and leave em scrabbling around to earn a few bob at small hall shows.
Eddie, Frank and Hennesey should just blackball the arrogant pudenda and leave em scrabbling around to earn a few bob at small hall shows.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
It was never going to happen but fwank and Eddie have done enough u-turns this year, after announcing they've had enough. Fwank may be fuming but he would still entertain the rematch with BJS, and Eddie would still promote Eubank jnr in big fights. In a way you can't blame team Eubank for jumping from channel to channel, and camp to camp, so far Eddie and fwank's ultimatums have held no water.
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Jesus Christ. This lot have lost the plot. Would love to hear what Ronnie Davies really thinks about this pantomime.craigjenkins05 wrote:http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2016/09/ ... -fight-off
-
jaymitch81
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 290
- Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 16:56
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Spot on mate. Could not have put it better.JimJim2009 wrote:It was never going to happen but fwank and Eddie have done enough u-turns this year, after announcing they've had enough. Fwank may be fuming but he would still entertain the rematch with BJS, and Eddie would still promote Eubank jnr in big fights. In a way you can't blame team Eubank for jumping from channel to channel, and camp to camp, so far Eddie and fwank's ultimatums have held no water.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
He's probably slapping his own face in disbelief.Supremo wrote:Jesus Christ. This lot have lost the plot. Would love to hear what Ronnie Davies really thinks about this pantomime.craigjenkins05 wrote:http://www.worldboxingnews.net/2016/09/ ... -fight-off
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Unless he has something else bigger lined up pronto then he's a knob!
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
Is that a poem?thepocketrocket wrote:Eubank Jnr’s management team have advised that, in their opinion, there has not been a fighter in the history of British Boxing who has had such a vast chasm of fighting prowess between him and the contenders for the British Championship in ability, speed, strength, accuracy and skill since its inauguration by the Marquess of Queensbury in the 1800’s.
I had to check this was real, and not some fake press release sent to WBN and taken as real, then published.
Re: Eubank V Langford off?
No offence to Langford but this was a mismatch. Langford lacks experience and would of been hurt badly Eubank Jnr is a World Level boxer he goes to the best gyms in the World for training. I think it's the right thing although I think it's for the wrong reasons.. Eubank Jnr will be trying to hijack BJS v Golovkin... Would like to see Jnr stop messing everyone around there is a fine line between doing anything for publicity and being a complete arsehole