Two cards should be merged

Rusty740 · Post by **Rusty740** » 17 Sep 2016, 19:58

This is surely the same fight and should be on the same card?

http://boxrec.com/show/628000 and http://boxrec.com/show/619255

claudevsq · Post by **claudevsq** » 18 Sep 2016, 03:49

No, the card was split into two, because one part was supervised by BDB, other part was supervised by the PBA.

wouter · Post by **wouter** » 18 Sep 2016, 05:24

claudevsq wrote:No, the card was split into two, because one part was supervised by BDB, other part was supervised by the PBA.

I think we should find a more elegant solution for situations like this one. Bureaucracy should not overrule common sense.

Rusty740 · Post by **Rusty740** » 18 Sep 2016, 09:22

claudevsq wrote:No, the card was split into two, because one part was supervised by BDB, other part was supervised by the PBA.

I noticed - why was that?

claudevsq · Post by **claudevsq** » 19 Sep 2016, 03:47

I have no idea, polish editor may know - but I guess because of title fight. Main card BDB and undercard PBA, maybe...