Heavyweight Triple Header?

Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Killer Blow »

http://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfu ... w=rankings

The IBF have taken Stiverne out of their rankings, so Joshua obviously won't be fighting him. Looks like Ugonuh or Pulev.
Last edited by Killer Blow on 21 Sep 2016, 08:33, edited 1 time in total.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Taansend »

thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote: Or watched this then posted your post :TU:
You mean like Quantum Leap?
No,like u watched this video on youtube when it first come out on 30th august then posted your post straight after u heard it on the 30th august. If u posted it on 28th august or anytime before 30th id say u thought of it id yourself and give u credit but,me being like columbo (a detective not an old pickle eyed man) i think u have tried to get credit for these match ups,just saying ;-)
No. I posted it and saw the video a few days later.

I'm not after credit. This site, and the people on it, isn't that important to me that I need to do the nonsense you're saying above.

If it's something you're into, fair enough Chump, but not my style.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by TheGman »

Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
You mean like Quantum Leap?
No,like u watched this video on youtube when it first come out on 30th august then posted your post straight after u heard it on the 30th august. If u posted it on 28th august or anytime before 30th id say u thought of it id yourself and give u credit but,me being like columbo (a detective not an old pickle eyed man) i think u have tried to get credit for these match ups,just saying ;-)
No. I posted it and saw the video a few days later.

I'm not after credit. This site, and the people on it, isn't that important to me that I need to do the nonsense you're saying above.

If it's something you're into, fair enough Chump, but not my style.
Sorry but the dates say u seen the vid then posted ur post. Just saying
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Taansend »

thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote: No,like u watched this video on youtube when it first come out on 30th august then posted your post straight after u heard it on the 30th august. If u posted it on 28th august or anytime before 30th id say u thought of it id yourself and give u credit but,me being like columbo (a detective not an old pickle eyed man) i think u have tried to get credit for these match ups,just saying ;-)
No. I posted it and saw the video a few days later.

I'm not after credit. This site, and the people on it, isn't that important to me that I need to do the nonsense you're saying above.

If it's something you're into, fair enough Chump, but not my style.
Sorry but the dates say u seen the vid then posted ur post. Just saying
No mate. The dates don't say that. You do. And it's o.k. for you to think that. It has no relevance to realilty. But If it makes you happy, go for it.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by TheGman »

Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
No. I posted it and saw the video a few days later.

I'm not after credit. This site, and the people on it, isn't that important to me that I need to do the nonsense you're saying above.

If it's something you're into, fair enough Chump, but not my style.
Sorry but the dates say u seen the vid then posted ur post. Just saying
No mate. The dates don't say that. You do. And it's o.k. for you to think that. It has no relevance to realilty. But If it makes you happy, go for it.
Youtube video uploaded august 30th 2016 u posted this august 30th 2016 hmmm dates show u COULD of watched it then posted it am i right buddy?
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by TheGman »

Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
No. I posted it and saw the video a few days later.

I'm not after credit. This site, and the people on it, isn't that important to me that I need to do the nonsense you're saying above.

If it's something you're into, fair enough Chump, but not my style.
Sorry but the dates say u seen the vid then posted ur post. Just saying
No mate. The dates don't say that. You do. And it's o.k. for you to think that. It has no relevance to realilty. But If it makes you happy, go for it.
Its ok if u did,thers no problem trying to get urself abit of attention pal :TU:
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Taansend »

thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote: Sorry but the dates say u seen the vid then posted ur post. Just saying
No mate. The dates don't say that. You do. And it's o.k. for you to think that. It has no relevance to realilty. But If it makes you happy, go for it.
Its ok if u did,thers no problem trying to get urself abit of attention pal :TU:
You mean like what you're attempting now....

I actually had a look at my initial post & I even say the source of the idea there. Go & have a look. You call yourself a detective. You could even use your detecting skills to check out BS that day to find the articles I'm referring to. Go on, I dare you.

By the way, I'm beginning to suspect that you & 'orse are one & the same :OhYes:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by TheGman »

Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
No mate. The dates don't say that. You do. And it's o.k. for you to think that. It has no relevance to realilty. But If it makes you happy, go for it.
Its ok if u did,thers no problem trying to get urself abit of attention pal :TU:
You mean like what you're attempting now....

I actually had a look at my initial post & I even say the source of the idea there. Go & have a look. You call yourself a detective. You could even use your detecting skills to check out BS that day to find the articles I'm referring to. Go on, I dare you.

By the way, I'm beginning to suspect that you & 'orse are one & the same :OhYes:
Haha :stop: cmon im not an ass. Im just winding u up mate :TU:
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Taansend »

thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote: Its ok if u did,thers no problem trying to get urself abit of attention pal :TU:
You mean like what you're attempting now....

I actually had a look at my initial post & I even say the source of the idea there. Go & have a look. You call yourself a detective. You could even use your detecting skills to check out BS that day to find the articles I'm referring to. Go on, I dare you.

By the way, I'm beginning to suspect that you & 'orse are one & the same :OhYes:
Haha :stop: cmon im not an ass. Im just winding u up mate :TU:
Cheers 'orse :TU:
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by TheGman »

Taansend wrote:
thechump wrote:
Taansend wrote:
You mean like what you're attempting now....

I actually had a look at my initial post & I even say the source of the idea there. Go & have a look. You call yourself a detective. You could even use your detecting skills to check out BS that day to find the articles I'm referring to. Go on, I dare you.

By the way, I'm beginning to suspect that you & 'orse are one & the same :OhYes:
Haha :stop: cmon im not an ass. Im just winding u up mate :TU:
Cheers 'orse :TU:
Your welcome attention seeker :OhYes:
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Heavyweight Triple Header?

Post by Rob3_142 »

Omg guys, get a bloody room!
Post Reply