max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post Reply
badkatt
Welterweight
Posts: 434
Joined: 12 Nov 2015, 00:06

max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by badkatt »

discuss ?
my moneys on max baer bigger man bigger punch ...,.somewwere in the fight he lands that right hand and ezzard charles gets knocked out
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Syntax Error »

Me too.

Ezzard is the better boxer & greater fighter, but I don't think he'd be big enough to withstand the force of Baer.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Kalan »

Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Syntax Error »

Kalan wrote:Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.
You make some good points.

I picked Baer because he is bigger & he is a brute, but Charles is definitely the better fighter & technician as opposed to tge cruder Baer, so that evens things up somewhat.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15181
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Charles by a very lopsided decision. Baer would have a remote puncher's chance and that is it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by gilgamesh »

Ambling Alp II wrote:Charles by a very lopsided decision. Baer would have a remote puncher's chance and that is it.
That's my thinking as well.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Crease »

badkatt wrote:my moneys on max baer bigger man bigger punch ...,.somewwere in the fight he lands that right hand and ezzard charles gets knocked out
A very possible outcome.

However, my money would be on an Ezzard Charles UD. I think that is a more likely result.

But an interesting matchup to be sure & one i would pay to see.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by BoxBuzz »

Kalan wrote:Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.

You done good Kalan. You show promise.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by davie »

Kalan wrote:Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.
For once, I agree with you entirely.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17089
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Seamus »

Charles would be the favorite, but Baer would have a definite puncher's chance.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Kalan »

BoxBuzz wrote:
Kalan wrote:Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.

You done good Kalan. You show promise.
You showed promise at the age of 10. They finally managed to potty train you. I'm amazed when you can follow the simplest logic because usually you're OTL
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by BoxBuzz »

Kalan wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:
Kalan wrote:Charles should be the favorite... The guy who beat Walcott twice would beat a prime Baer... Baer had no fundamentals... He had a great chin and a hard swing... He had huge shoulders and very long arms and legs... He had ZERO interest in Boxing Science and was a pure swinger... Charles would have no fear of Baer because of their disparity in Boxing skills.

Part of what swingers rely on is fear -- if your opponent is scared to death, you're free to smash him into the canvas like Baer did to Carnera.. Louis had ZERO fear of Baer and Braddock also had zero fear.. They knew all they had to do was outbox Baer.. Charles would make the same correct calculation.

You done good Kalan. You show promise.
You showed promise at the age of 10. They finally managed to potty train you. I'm amazed when you can follow the simplest logic because usually you're OTL
On The Level? Of course I am....I always speaks me heart at all times. Keep up with the sensible assessments, and I'm going to take back half the bad things I've ever said about you.
Keko
Welterweight
Posts: 682
Joined: 15 Apr 2016, 01:42

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by Keko »

gilgamesh wrote:
Ambling Alp II wrote:Charles by a very lopsided decision. Baer would have a remote puncher's chance and that is it.
That's my thinking as well.
:TU:
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: max baer vs ezzard charles who wins >???

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Ezzard by DQ because Max would be that frustrated that he hit's Charles low when he catch's up to him about round 10 :TU:
Post Reply