AJ vs Wladimir...

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by Horse »

DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P :OhYes:
Like he would most people's.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

BitPlayer wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: It means not having a win over a top ten fighter.

And here something weird, if the competition is poor, that means you need to fight higher ranked opponents to be credible, not lower.
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter :lol:
Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by DannyMCR »

Horse wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P :OhYes:
Like he would most people's.
I will ask you again, based on what?
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by TheGman »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter :lol:
Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
X2
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by TheGman »

Horse wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Your logic is wasted on him.
And whats ur logic u donkey?
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by TheGman »

Horse wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P :OhYes:
Like he would most people's.
Horse? More like a fvckin ass
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by kevo »

thechump wrote:
Horse wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:But Khan made your September top ten British P4P :OhYes:
Like he would most people's.
Horse? More like a fvckin ass
There's no need for name calling
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by Horse »

kevo wrote:There's no need for name calling
There's no need for him to post anything at all, he's rubbish.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by davie »

Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.

THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.

Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.
Basically all in one breath. :doh:

So his world champion heavy weight, who he maintains is the best in the world, isn't quite ready to face a done, 40 year old ex-champion who lost his last fight, with a really poor performance, to a guy that Hearn maintains his man would also whup.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by Andrew »

davie wrote:
Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.

THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.

Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.
Basically all in one breath. :doh:

So his world champion heavy weight, who he maintains is the best in the world, isn't quite ready to face a done, 40 year old ex-champion who lost his last fight, with a really poor performance, to a guy that Hearn maintains his man would also whup.
Anyone with one if these belts and proclaiming to be word champion should be ready for ANYONE.

AJs opponent will b David price or Jarrell Miller you watch.

Then hearn says we offered x y z etc etc
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by asdfjkl »

davie wrote:
Naandrew wrote:Hearn was saying he doesn't want this fight unless Fury gets stripped and the other belts are on the lines.

THIS FIGHT DOESNT NEED F**KING BELTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Right now this fight would be huge and if AJ destroyed Wlad then he becomes the man because it looks like Fury is never fighting again.

Hearn just making excuses this fight isn't happening.
He also said, in an interview I watched the other day, that Wlad was looking done and that Joshua wasn't ready for him yet.
Basically all in one breath. :doh:

So his world champion heavy weight, who he maintains is the best in the world, isn't quite ready to face a done, 40 year old ex-champion who lost his last fight, with a really poor performance, to a guy that Hearn maintains his man would also whup.
Things change over time you know. AJ didn't expect Fury to win either, while he also thinks Fury is probably quite an easy opponend.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by BitPlayer »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
because a Kubrat Pulev bout is going to teach Joshua Soooooo much about what it means to be a top fighter :lol:
Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters. :lol:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

BitPlayer wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: Considering his best opponents have been Whyte and Breazeale, it likely would.
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters. :lol:
Just because Pulev is 'ranked', doesn't mean he'll do any better than those guys.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: AJ vs Wladimir...

Post by BitPlayer »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Pulev is upright, has no head movement, leaves his chin out to dry. He would be stopped very quickly. Look at how the styles match up instead of fixating on records and meaningless alphabet rankings. Assess fighters on an absolute scale rather than a relative one. Use eyes.
Because Whyte and Brezeale are defensive masters. :lol:
Just because Pulev is 'ranked', doesn't mean he'll do any better than those guys.
No, because he's better he will.
elephant man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 13:00

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by elephant man »

Hearn was asked about it and said no. Nothing is official or confirmed right now.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Stuarty »

Saw this doing the rounds last night and fast car has denied it. Big gamble if they are even considering it! I'll be surprised if this happens. Wlad is probably past his best but he's always in great shape and has bags of experience. He's still head and shoulders above the tripe AJ has fought so far.
Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Spiker »

I hope this comes off its totally 50/50 fight in my thinking.
Joshua could easily get gassed with wlads grabbing style ( don't read this Eddie he will be fine honest) :salut:
Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Spiker »

Well I cant see Parker being ready :brick: I expect AJ wants it but Fast Eddie has lost a lot lately
chrisnew86
Super Welterweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by chrisnew86 »

" charismatic personality "

That's how that article describes AJ :lol:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Counter-puncher »

chrisnew86 wrote:" charismatic personality "

That's how that article describes AJ :lol:
:lol:
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by ILikeBeer »

So, by official do we mean; "Still rumoured"?
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Just me thinking this would be easy for Mr Humble? Wlad isn't the fighter he was 3 or 4 years ago
Frazier71
Super Lightweight
Posts: 103
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 02:26

Re: Its official then. AJ v WK

Post by Frazier71 »

It's an article based on the UCN tweet and nothing else.
Post Reply