I think Briggs would win against Stiverne and Fedosov, possibly Washington even. Also, I don't expect him to win, but that doesn't mean he hasn't earned the fight.Lackeos wrote:I have no idea how a real boxing fan could take Briggs more seriously as an opponent than someone like Duhaupas, Stiverne, Jennings, Fedosov, Washington, or Whyte. Briggs objectively deserves a lower ranking than any of them, he hasn't beat anyone with a pulse since 2006, his pineapple hairstyle made him look like a clown, and he acts like a clown. Briggs might as well be wearing actual clown make-up and you're pointing at him and saying "This is the most serious human being on planet Earth."asdfjkl wrote:If it isn't Briggs I can't ever take this guy serious again.
David Haye to fight on December 10
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Stiverne, Fedosov, and Washington would beat him.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Stiverne would lose against pretty much any heavyweight from the top 60, Fedosov pretty much anyone from the top 50 and Washington should have lost against that other, smaller and lighter 40+ year old as well.crusader wrote:Stiverne, Fedosov, and Washington would beat him.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Serious question . . . Is Shannon your boyfriend?asdfjkl wrote:Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Nope, no boy will ever get a chance on me. Maybe crusader can help you out if you're into that. I bet he can give you exactly the feelings you like.Tanzio wrote:Serious question . . . Is Shannon your boyfriend?asdfjkl wrote:Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Serious question, asdfjkl:
What makes you rate Briggs so highly? He has done nothing in the ring to earn a payday against Haye, but that said, neither did de Mori or Gjergjaj.
What makes you rate Briggs so highly? He has done nothing in the ring to earn a payday against Haye, but that said, neither did de Mori or Gjergjaj.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
As long as he fights someone with a pulse, I don't care. I don't really see Haye beating any of the top 10 - he's too slow now after putting on too much weight. He should fight Briggs or Price and see what he's got left.
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Serious question: are you really thinking that you could beat Wilder with one arm?asdfjkl wrote:Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
I think he means Arreola, but either way it's idiotic.Boxing Writer wrote:Serious question: are you really thinking that you could beat Wilder with one arm?asdfjkl wrote:Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
So just combine the shows for a bigger event and match the winners. Joshua vs Klitschko winner vs Parker vs Ruiz winner.Grailer wrote:Joseph Parker's team is booked for 10th December possibly against Andy Ruiz Jr for soon to be vacant WBA and WBO titles
http://www.newshub.co.nz/sport/video-de ... 2016053016
-
Ilya Muromets
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4243
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Another choreographed fake fight, or a real fight this time?
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
On the 17th October, we’ll likely find out what the WBO intends to do with Tyson Fury’s heavyweight title belt. So if Klitschko faces Joshua, then it seems likely that Parker will face Ruiz Jr. in Aukland (New Zealand) for the vacant WBO world title.actjac wrote:So just combine the shows for a bigger event and match the winners. Joshua vs Klitschko winner vs Parker vs Ruiz winner.Grailer wrote:Joseph Parker's team is booked for 10th December possibly against Andy Ruiz Jr for soon to be vacant WBA and WBO titles
http://www.newshub.co.nz/sport/video-de ... 2016053016
Whilst I’m sure that Parker is a decent heavyweight and probably a nice guy, he’s not the most charismatic fellow. I’ve just watched him chair a few press conferences and his facial expression and vocal tone remains static and emotionally neutral at all times… to almost robotic levels. He may struggle to gain many fans outside his home country if he doesn't learn to be more comfortable in front of the media.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
I'd love Haye v Parker, that would be an awesome fight. I'm sure Haye would love the chance to pick up Fury's belts.
Please leave Briggs well alone. BTW, Stiverne might lose to everyone in the top 60 but I'm not convinced Briggs is in the top 60
Please leave Briggs well alone. BTW, Stiverne might lose to everyone in the top 60 but I'm not convinced Briggs is in the top 60
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
If I would realise it, it's easy to adept in such a fight. He can't, or can barely use it, he's in pain all the time, defending will be less hard. I think an avarage light heavyweight can be compared with a heavely injured top 20 heavyweight. If it was Povetkin in that ring, Wilder would have never survived it. Even Stiverne would probably have won easely from that moment.Boxing Writer wrote:Serious question: are you really thinking that you could beat Wilder with one arm?asdfjkl wrote:Wilder chickened out as well indeed, even after Briggs offered to fight for free, something Arreola never did, somehow Arreola probably agreed to lose the fight for a pile of money I guess, that's why Wilder won despite even I could win the fight against that guy with one arm.crusader wrote:Briggs is better as Wilder too, right?
Even Vitali lost in such a moment, simply because that was a real fight instead of a showfight just for the money like this.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Arreola is still Top 60 and Stiverne beat him twice. Stiverne definitely sucks and there's definitely a lot of guys in the Top 20 and 30 I could see beating him, but I think he'd beat some guys within the Top 60 surely.Lenny wrote:I'd love Haye v Parker, that would be an awesome fight. I'm sure Haye would love the chance to pick up Fury's belts.
Please leave Briggs well alone. BTW, Stiverne might lose to everyone in the top 60 but I'm not convinced Briggs is in the top 60
Briggs wouldn't beat any fighter with a pulse anymore. He has no intention of trying either until there's a lot of money in it for him. All he wants anymore is one last payday.
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Haye should get the same response many of you give Dirrell.
He don't want to fight.
He don't want to fight.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
whos he fighting shane sutckliff ?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Briggs already offered to fight for free and already won against several gys who were ranked within the top 100 at the time. Sadly nobody within the top 60, except for Parker, dared to fight Briggs. Briggs has challenged many, many guys with padded fake records. Especially the older guys who have absolutely nothing to look for in the top of the division. Like Haye, Wilder, Browne, Briggs in fact leaves real champs that aren't after a payday, like AJ, Parker, name them, completely alone.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola is still Top 60 and Stiverne beat him twice. Stiverne definitely sucks and there's definitely a lot of guys in the Top 20 and 30 I could see beating him, but I think he'd beat some guys within the Top 60 surely.Lenny wrote:I'd love Haye v Parker, that would be an awesome fight. I'm sure Haye would love the chance to pick up Fury's belts.
Please leave Briggs well alone. BTW, Stiverne might lose to everyone in the top 60 but I'm not convinced Briggs is in the top 60
Briggs wouldn't beat any fighter with a pulse anymore. He has no intention of trying either until there's a lot of money in it for him. All he wants anymore is one last payday.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Everybody with a pulse beats Briggs. The entire Top 40 beats Briggs.asdfjkl wrote:Briggs already offered to fight for free and already won against several gys who were ranked within the top 100 at the time. Sadly nobody within the top 60, except for Parker, dared to fight Briggs. Briggs has challenged many, many guys with padded fake records. Especially the older guys who have absolutely nothing to look for in the top of the division. Like Haye, Wilder, Browne, Briggs in fact leaves real champs that aren't after a payday, like AJ, Parker, name them, completely alone.gilgamesh wrote:Arreola is still Top 60 and Stiverne beat him twice. Stiverne definitely sucks and there's definitely a lot of guys in the Top 20 and 30 I could see beating him, but I think he'd beat some guys within the Top 60 surely.Lenny wrote:I'd love Haye v Parker, that would be an awesome fight. I'm sure Haye would love the chance to pick up Fury's belts.
Please leave Briggs well alone. BTW, Stiverne might lose to everyone in the top 60 but I'm not convinced Briggs is in the top 60
Briggs wouldn't beat any fighter with a pulse anymore. He has no intention of trying either until there's a lot of money in it for him. All he wants anymore is one last payday.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Haye could beat anyone. Bi is right that he's shown no interest in stepping up, but there is nobody untouchable to him. I think he'd destroy fury if he went for it.
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
"Haye could beat anyone". Please...SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Haye could beat anyone. Bi is right that he's shown no interest in stepping up, but there is nobody untouchable to him. I think he'd destroy fury if he went for it.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: David Haye to fight on December 10
Who does he have no chance against?