Mitchell Smith

Post Reply
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

Returns tomorrow night, Don't know much about his opponent but he didn't look in terrific shape to be honest.

I saw an Interview with him where it said he will be staying at Super-Feather or maybe even going to Lightweight. IMO that would be bad move.

Hopefully him and George win tomorrow night and they can get the rematch on.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Rexob »

The lad has blown his fuse, he thought he was unbeatable and looked a twat when Jupp did him, not going anywhere.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Stuarty »

Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by maley1984 »

Neither looked in great shape at the weigh in. Smith says his been training hard with Adam booth. 10 Stone for smith no way he makes feather.
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

maley1984 wrote:Neither looked in great shape at the weigh in. Smith says his been training hard with Adam booth. 10 Stone for smith no way he makes feather.
He must have big legs because his top half looks like a small super Bantam.

I reckon his diet is to blame.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11978
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Taansend »

Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Nicolay Valuev :bow:
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Stuarty »

Taansend wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Nicolay Valuev :bow:
:lol: Yesss
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Andrew »

He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.
chrisnew86
Super Welterweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by chrisnew86 »

Naandrew wrote:He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.
His attitude stunk.

" I want to put George in hospital, I want to see him being carried out of the ring "

What a Wanker
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Stuarty »

Naandrew wrote:He was a grossly over rated fighter who developed a huge ego from beating journeymen Eastern Europeans who were generally moving up in weight as well.

I always remember the fight he had on the Eubank Saunders card. It was some Hungarian for the prestigious WBO European belt. Bunce and Lillis were raving about him before and after but I wasn't impressed at all.

George Jupp well and truly humbled him especially after his attitude in the pre fight press conference too.
Bunce and Lillis rave about Fwanks fighters ten a penny! They must get a bonus for it! I've always though Paul Butler was very overrated! Good fighter but not half as good as they make out! Enjoyed Tete handing his ass to him!
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by samwbr »

Seems like he realised he was a bit of a wanker

http://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2016/10/ ... a-bad-way/

I think he is a talent but the questions around his attitude and application will always be there.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Stuarty »

Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Before Jupp exposed the little nickname stealing fornicate head he said he would consider Feather for Warrington so I dunno why he's talking about lightweight! I don't like him at all!
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?
Well I thought you might be a friend of Lyon Woodstock who claims the same thing lol.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Stuarty »

Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Who did he steal the nickname off mate?
Barrera mate! Surely you must know that?
Well I thought you might be a friend of Lyon Woodstock who claims the same thing lol.
Not me man lol
telboy66
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Nov 2007, 11:11

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by telboy66 »

He's not a bad lad he just lost sight of the big prize,there is nothing wrong with self confidence it's how you handle yourself after it gets dented that matters,I think we will see a different Mitchell tonight now that he's with Adam Booth,in his fight with Jupp there was no plan B he was so sure that he would KO him that nothing was in place for when he didn't ,he showed disrespect to Jupp before the fight and after by leaving the ring before George was presented with the belt which was unexceptable ,I'll be there tonight hoping to see a new more controlled boxer
Last edited by telboy66 on 08 Oct 2016, 11:37, edited 1 time in total.
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

What time does tonight show start on allegedly?
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by samwbr »

Fitzy901 wrote:What time does tonight show start on allegedly?
7pm
Eddy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 898
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 13:06

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Eddy »

Don't like MS at all. Was totaly disrespectfull to Jupp before. All this "I was out of shape" or "I was depressed" ect seems to be getting passed around a lot when fighters lose or get caught doing drugs.

He's only humble cause he got slapped. If he'd had won that fight, MS would still be acting like a horriable little sh_t that he is. These boxers like him and Prince Patel, have seen the likes of Broner and Mayweather doing it, and are trying to copy them. I don't blame them in that sense, as it gets you recgnized, but when you get a hiding, don't give it all the excuses
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

You can dislike him but you can't help but admit he has got bags of talent.

If he got himself down to feather/Super-Bantam he could go places.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by crusader »

Bags of talent? As in world class talent? Euro? British?

He's certainly proven that he can beat up journeymen and some area level guys (not George Jupp though).
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by maley1984 »

Fitzy901 wrote:You can dislike him but you can't help but admit he has got bags of talent.

If he got himself down to feather/Super-Bantam he could go places.

No way he makes super ban and I doubt he will get down to feather.
ChessBoxer
Welterweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 19 Dec 2015, 17:47

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by ChessBoxer »

Mitchell Smith is talented and has huge potential . He underestimated Jupp who clearly outboxed him and lost by a clear mile . Smith needs a new approach you cant just throw power punches all day and expect your opponent to walk onto them. I seriously believe with the right trainer he could certainly go places but his technique is/was awful.
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Mitchell Smith

Post by Fitzy901 »

ChessBoxer wrote:Mitchell Smith is talented and has huge potential . He underestimated Jupp who clearly outboxed him and lost by a clear mile . Smith needs a new approach you cant just throw power punches all day and expect your opponent to walk onto them. I seriously believe with the right trainer he could certainly go places but his technique is/was awful.
His technique is awful?

Then what the fornicate is Anthony Joshua's technique like or someone like Ohara Davies or Andy Townend.
Post Reply