Selby v Warrington?

Post Reply
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Selby v Warrington?

Post by Fitzy901 »

Barros beat Hosono to become mandatory for the IBF, I am not sure that fight is much of a money spinner nor is it even an attractive prospect for Selby.

Surely now, they will look at the Warrington fight it's the only one that makes sense before he gets Frampton next summer?

He can box Barros next year.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by Stuarty »

Selby at his best is a joy to watch but he flatters to deceive a lot of the time. I've seen him look a bit 'meh' too much now. He has to be more active and look for the big names. Warrington is a decent domestic fight but I think Selby beats him handily even if he's not at his best.
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by Fitzy901 »

Stuarty30 wrote:Selby at his best is a joy to watch but he flatters to deceive a lot of the time. I've seen him look a bit 'meh' too much now. He has to be more active and look for the big names. Warrington is a decent domestic fight but I think Selby beats him handily even if he's not at his best.
I would like to see Selby v Quigg, I think that would gel well and be interesting .
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by Stuarty »

Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Selby at his best is a joy to watch but he flatters to deceive a lot of the time. I've seen him look a bit 'meh' too much now. He has to be more active and look for the big names. Warrington is a decent domestic fight but I think Selby beats him handily even if he's not at his best.
I would like to see Selby v Quigg, I think that would gel well and be interesting .
I wouldn't mind seeing that as well mate. You heard any word on Quiggs opponent next month?m
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by Fitzy901 »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Fitzy901 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:Selby at his best is a joy to watch but he flatters to deceive a lot of the time. I've seen him look a bit 'meh' too much now. He has to be more active and look for the big names. Warrington is a decent domestic fight but I think Selby beats him handily even if he's not at his best.
I would like to see Selby v Quigg, I think that would gel well and be interesting .
I wouldn't mind seeing that as well mate. You heard any word on Quiggs opponent next month?m
No mate,

I think he doesn't know what weigh he wants to do, he said they would move up to feather but then he was calling out Cermeno the bloke who holds his old belt.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13437
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by jameswilson »

Quigg will have a warm up fight and then possibly some kind of eliminator at least before getting another WT shot.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by Boxing Prospect »

Barros apparently won't be able to fight this year regardless, could still face Hosono in theory, but he ended up with a nasty cut himself.

Can't see Warrington fighting him
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Selby v Warrington?

Post by brilo33 »

a top selby batters him for me, i use that term, because that is was what lee selby can do when he is nasty and in the mood
Post Reply