I actually stopped reply to his BS. Hope more of us will do it too...tiny_acres wrote:His racist comments are enough for a lifetime ban from this forum.SFW wrote:Do you wake up with race related thoughts in your head or is there like an e-mail list to join that has a racist verse of the day type thing?asdfjkl wrote: It's not just about the 80 ish million for Povetkin, it's also because Wilder tries to destroy his name and a lot of dumb African American Wilder fans think that Povetkin actually did something wrong, while he didn't. Povetkin is a 100% innocent men, from the start.
He's by far the most useless poster on this site
WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
I haven't read a word from that little bitch in ages.bigman1968 wrote:Don't confuse ajfuck with facts...his tongue so deep in Riabinsky's ass that are really hope for him he is getting paid, at least-))))Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.asdfjkl wrote: Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word.
Review the facts again and let me know if this leads you to revise your theory.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Ryabinsky hinted about filing a law suit on May 31st, almost two weeks before DiBella filing his suit.
Рябинский АндрейVerified account
@Ryabinskiy
Alexander Povetkin's new sample clear. We are waiting for our opponents and some journalists to apologize... Or pay for their words)
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
He is pretty weird and I strongly disagree with most of his points, but there were much, much worse posters here. "asdfjkl" is extremely sensible comparing to complete idiots like Rover (remember him?)tiny_acres wrote:His racist comments are enough for a lifetime ban from this forum.SFW wrote:Do you wake up with race related thoughts in your head or is there like an e-mail list to join that has a racist verse of the day type thing?asdfjkl wrote: It's not just about the 80 ish million for Povetkin, it's also because Wilder tries to destroy his name and a lot of dumb African American Wilder fans think that Povetkin actually did something wrong, while he didn't. Povetkin is a 100% innocent men, from the start.
He's by far the most useless poster on this site
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Rover is in this thread, just haven't started his massive crap yet.Boxing Writer wrote:He is pretty weird and I strongly disagree with most of his points, but there were much, much worse posters here. "asdfjkl" is extremely sensible comparing to complete idiots like Rover (remember him?)tiny_acres wrote:His racist comments are enough for a lifetime ban from this forum.SFW wrote:
Do you wake up with race related thoughts in your head or is there like an e-mail list to join that has a racist verse of the day type thing?
He's by far the most useless poster on this site
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
100% innocent.asdfjkl wrote:It's not just about the 80 ish million for Povetkin, it's also because Wilder tries to destroy his name and a lot of dumb African American Wilder fans think that Povetkin actually did something wrong, while he didn't. Povetkin is a 100% innocent men, from the start.
Only a child would talk like that about any athlete in 2016.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
http://www.BS.com/povetkins-pr ... ry--104628Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.asdfjkl wrote:Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word.bigman1968 wrote:
Actually it's Wilder\DiBella suit for contract breach for 5M and Povetkin\Riabinsky countersuit for defamation for crazy $$$.
Defamation is very hard to prove in court, contract breach is much easier....I don't know who represents Riabinsky, but Wilder guy is Judd Burstein...best litigator in Sport business.
Review the facts again and let me know if this leads you to revise your theory.
Maybe you should get your facts straight lol. It happened exactly the way I discribed.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
It's not racist, there are also more intelligent ones who don't fall for Wilder and his team their lies. Somehow the dumber ones do fall for it, you can see it all over youtube if you like.tiny_acres wrote:His racist comments are enough for a lifetime ban from this forum.SFW wrote:Do you wake up with race related thoughts in your head or is there like an e-mail list to join that has a racist verse of the day type thing?asdfjkl wrote: It's not just about the 80 ish million for Povetkin, it's also because Wilder tries to destroy his name and a lot of dumb African American Wilder fans think that Povetkin actually did something wrong, while he didn't. Povetkin is a 100% innocent men, from the start.
He's by far the most useless poster on this site
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Here’s what you stated:asdfjkl wrote:http://www.BS.com/povetkins-pr ... ry--104628Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.asdfjkl wrote: Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word.
Review the facts again and let me know if this leads you to revise your theory.
Maybe you should get your facts straight lol. It happened exactly the way I discribed.
It’s impossible to “countersue” someone whilst there isn’t a pending lawsuit against yourself.asdfjkl wrote:Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word
Here’s what I stated… and is technically and irrefutably correct:
I don’t need to research the matter further, because my original statement is correct and remains unchallenged.Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Something happened to Kalan? His silence is unusual ![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Fact remains, everybody knew Wilder and his team were getting brought to court, so if he then suddenly starts to sue Ryabinsky you should have known it's a desperate action of a pussy with barely any options left, a reaction to that what he couldn't avoid. A countersuit, unlike Ryabinsky who simply kept his word. Wilder his desperate reaction had nothing to do with it, the subject is completely different. Ryabinsky never countersuited at all.Enlightened-One wrote:Here’s what you stated:asdfjkl wrote:http://www.BS.com/povetkins-promoter-ready-sue-team-wilder-force-mandatory--104628Enlightened-One wrote: Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.
Review the facts again and let me know if this leads you to revise your theory.
Maybe you should get your facts straight lol. It happened exactly the way I discribed.It’s impossible to “countersue” someone whilst there isn’t a pending lawsuit against yourself.asdfjkl wrote:Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word
Here’s what I stated… and is technically and irrefutably correct:I don’t need to research the matter further, because my original statement is correct and remains unchallenged.Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
And after thr recent events, defamation lawsuit looks sounds funny, at least-))))SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Wilder has a great case considering the legal precedent was set by ryabinsky. Povetkin has nothing but a threat and a hope that the legitimate suit gets dropped.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Yes, Wilder filed an actual suit first, but Ryabinsky tweeted that he is going to sue before that.Enlightened-One wrote:Team Wilder had previously filed his suit for $5 million two weeks before Andrey Ryabinsky filed the $34.5 million dollar lawsuit against Deontay.asdfjkl wrote:Well, actually it's Ryabinski who allready said he was planning to suit Wilder and then Wilder countersuited him while Ryabinski prepared his case and like allways, kept his word.bigman1968 wrote:
Actually it's Wilder\DiBella suit for contract breach for 5M and Povetkin\Riabinsky countersuit for defamation for crazy $$$.
Defamation is very hard to prove in court, contract breach is much easier....I don't know who represents Riabinsky, but Wilder guy is Judd Burstein...best litigator in Sport business.
Review the facts again and let me know if this leads you to revise your theory.
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
If everything I've heard is correct, aren't the testing agencies 100% to blame?
Common Sense Check
1. Your opponent failed a drug test.
2. You're not going to fight him.
That's the route 99.9999% of humans would take.
Because it is common sense.
Several of you idiots here are trying to make this into a Wilder thing.
He's not a scientist. How much knowledge of advanced chemistry do you think he has?
How much knowledge of advanced chemistry does 99% of the world have?
If everything is true, then it's the testing company's fault.
Their error led Wilder/Stiverne to do the logical thing.
If you think that Deontay Wilder is scheming, or even in the room scheming on these things,
YOU ARE A DICK HEAD.
This is some complete bullsh!t at the higher levels that continue to show boxing is a broken system.
Common Sense Check
1. Your opponent failed a drug test.
2. You're not going to fight him.
That's the route 99.9999% of humans would take.
Because it is common sense.
Several of you idiots here are trying to make this into a Wilder thing.
He's not a scientist. How much knowledge of advanced chemistry do you think he has?
How much knowledge of advanced chemistry does 99% of the world have?
If everything is true, then it's the testing company's fault.
Their error led Wilder/Stiverne to do the logical thing.
If you think that Deontay Wilder is scheming, or even in the room scheming on these things,
YOU ARE A DICK HEAD.
This is some complete bullsh!t at the higher levels that continue to show boxing is a broken system.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Point is that Wilder probably knew weeks and weeks beforehand that the Povetkin fight would never happen. That's why he ducked Povetkin all the time till all of a sudden he wanted to fight him?! And on top of that, also had absolutely no problems any more with fighting in Russia! He only begged at the WBC if they could guarantee Wada testing. Then, right after Wada their mistake begged for the fight to be cancelled instead of delayed, instead of asking for a good investigation.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:If everything I've heard is correct, aren't the testing agencies 100% to blame?
Common Sense Check
1. Your opponent failed a drug test.
2. You're not going to fight him.
That's the route 99.9999% of humans would take.
Because it is common sense.
Several of you idiots here are trying to make this into a Wilder thing.
He's not a scientist. How much knowledge of advanced chemistry do you think he has?
How much knowledge of advanced chemistry does 99% of the world have?
If everything is true, then it's the testing company's fault.
Their error led Wilder/Stiverne to do the logical thing.
If you think that Deontay Wilder is scheming, or even in the room scheming on these things,
YOU ARE A DICK HEAD.
This is some complete bullsh!t at the higher levels that continue to show boxing is a broken system.
This is also why Wilder was more fat and out of shape then ever before, as well as ever since. It's no wonder he injured himself against Arreola soon after.
And also lost the weight again, he only gained that because he hasn't trained for ages.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Wilder and stiverne are both getting paid.bigman1968 wrote:And after thr recent events, defamation lawsuit looks sounds funny, at least-))))SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Wilder has a great case considering the legal precedent was set by ryabinsky. Povetkin has nothing but a threat and a hope that the legitimate suit gets dropped.
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
This article shows you the reasons for all the skullduggery of VADA and the WBC... They didn't want Ryabinsky to outbid American promoters for lucrative Heavyweight Championshp Fights... they don't want to lose North America's last claim to a Heavyweight Championship... and they don't want Russia to to stabilize itself as a major venue to stage World Heavyweight Championship Fights -- or Title Fights in general.AntonS wrote:View http://www.espn.com.au/boxing/story/_/i ... tkin-fightsandis wrote:Who is Riabinsky? Boxrec does not have this promoter. Is he vice-president of commission?
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
So why the eff WBC need VADA to avoid Povetkin?Kalan wrote:This article shows you the reasons for all the skullduggery of VADA and the WBC... They didn't want Ryabinsky to outbid American promoters for lucrative Heavyweight Championshp Fights... they don't want to lose North America's last claim to a Heavyweight Championship... and they don't want Russia to to stabilize itself as a major venue to stage World Heavyweight Championship Fights -- or Title Fights in general.AntonS wrote:View http://www.espn.com.au/boxing/story/_/i ... tkin-fightsandis wrote:Who is Riabinsky? Boxrec does not have this promoter. Is he vice-president of commission?
WBO, WBA and IBF just ignore him, it's easy.. WBC could easily do the same.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
Because that's quite sad behaviour.bigman1968 wrote:So why the eff WBC need VADA to avoid Povetkin?Kalan wrote:This article shows you the reasons for all the skullduggery of VADA and the WBC... They didn't want Ryabinsky to outbid American promoters for lucrative Heavyweight Championshp Fights... they don't want to lose North America's last claim to a Heavyweight Championship... and they don't want Russia to to stabilize itself as a major venue to stage World Heavyweight Championship Fights -- or Title Fights in general.AntonS wrote:View http://www.espn.com.au/boxing/story/_/i ... tkin-fight
WBO, WBA and IBF just ignore him, it's easy.. WBC could easily do the same.
Oh, he's better then me? Oh, let's just act like he doesn't exist!
As a sportman you simply shouldn't be that sad, Povetkin is a better boxer as Deontay Wilder, and the Americans should simply admit it. Also note, that once you're a champion or mandatory you're automatically out of all the other belts. Has nothing to do with ignoring.
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
There is nothing frivolous about being defamed by DiBella and Wilder... Those bastards need to pay through the nose... The WBC is worried because The WBC and VADA are the next obvious targets of lawsuits from Povetkin and Ryabinsky... Those filthy, lying, crooked bastards should get tossed in the slammer.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The op didn't post the whole statement. Not a threat, just clarification on the interim title. Penalties should be stiffer for frivolous law suits. I'm sure wilder will just settle when they offer him a couple million before either hits court.
Re: WBC strongly advise to Riabinsky not to go to trial!
And yes it's a threat... The jackasses at the WBC are so arrogant they think they can scare Povetkin into dropping his lawsuits versus Wilder and DiBella.. Not a chance.. It's time the miserable crooks in Boxing start paying for their partisan schemes, manipulation, and fix jobs.. The WBC got with VADA and are forcing all it's champions and challengers to take VADA testing even though the V in VADA stands for "voluntary" ... They're a rip off of WADA.