Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post Reply
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by Mimmy »

Haye and Amir Khan have been removed from the WBC rankings according to an article im reading on a facebook boxing group. This seems to have been done as the WBC have released names of boxers who refused to join a 'clean up boxing campaign' by the WBC to root out drug cheats.

more here

https://www.boxingnewsandviews.com/2016/10/12/wbc/
BillyTKid
Cruiserweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 13:19

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by BillyTKid »

According to skysports Khan has now registered. Haye, Pascal, Martirosyan, Peterson, Barthelemy, Verdejo, Gamboa and Viloria still haven't though and will be removed from the rankings. Interesting.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by Finn »

BillyTKid wrote:According to skysports Khan has now registered. Haye, Pascal, Martirosyan, Peterson, Barthelemy, Verdejo, Gamboa and Viloria still haven't though and will be removed from the rankings. Interesting.
Think Khan has always been a supporter of the stay clean campaigns. I should imagine it's more a case of boxers not getting round to it at the mo rather than refusing to join. If they get removed from he rankings then that's another thing all together.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by Stuarty »

Why wouldn't they join?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by Syntax Error »

Nothing the alphabet boys does surprises me, but removing a boxer from your ranking for non boxing reasons, when they haven't committed any crimes or misdemeanours is beyond pathetic.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by tobyh5 »

Syntax Error wrote:Nothing the alphabet boys does surprises me, but removing a boxer from your ranking for non boxing reasons, when they haven't committed any crimes or misdemeanours is beyond pathetic.
Not in my opinion. It is very much boxing reasons. Being clean or dirty in the ring is very much relevant. It can only be positive trying to find and catch drug cheats and attempt to make the sport clean and drug free. If someone is not willing to sign up to a programme that is about drugs, then they should be out.

Don't want to be out? Just sign up to a drug programme, pretty simple, give me one reason why not to?

Now the effectiveness to said initiative is open to debate, but that is besides the point as it is at least an attempt
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by gobbles »

Syntax Error wrote:Nothing the alphabet boys does surprises me, but removing a boxer from your ranking for non boxing reasons, when they haven't committed any crimes or misdemeanours is beyond pathetic.

You can't compete at the Olympics in any sport unless you submit to random testing, why should you box for a world title?
Doping is an epidemic in boxing and anything that is done to stamp it out is a good thing.

I would have thought both Haye and Khan get randomly tested by UKAD already, so I don't understand why they wouldn't sign up. Sounds like incompetence, probably not helped by them not having a promoter that sorts these things out for them. You would imagine someone from Matchroom/Warren doing all the organising for their boxers and making sure they sign the forms.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: Haye removed from WBC ranking.

Post by DannyMCR »

Stuarty30 wrote:Why wouldn't they join?
Probaby thought it'd never come down to them losing their ranking
Post Reply