BNation on its last legs?

the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by the_doctor »

There just aren't enough hardcore boxing fans willing/able to pay an extra monthly subscription to make the model work.

You either have to:
1. Have a near monopoly on all the "big" fights, making the subscription worth it to the casual audience
2. Go free-to-air (or included as part of Sky/Virgin etc) and do the occasional PPV
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by PredatorHayds »

chrisnew86 wrote:
Supremo wrote:
surfthehurf wrote:
The only elements of Sky Sports boxing that I can whinge about are the pricing and amount of adverts.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Are you for real???

Lack of international coverage.
The refusal to acknowledge that any fight that Sky don't show is relevant or even happening.
Under cards and generally main events full of home fighters getting walkovers against sub standard opposition.
The continual drive to test the public boundaries of acceptability and what they can get away with whilst still charging PPV.
The commentators who follow the party line and say what their paymasters tell them to say.
The insults to the intelligence when they pretend fights are going to be 50/50
The exploitation of the casual fans lack of knowledge and ignoring of anyone with half a clue about boxing.

I could go on all day....

I think the guy is either new to the sport ( nothing wrong with that ) or brainwashed by the sales men over at Sky.

If we want to watch world class boxing from around the world on an almost weekly basis it's BN that have it. I find Bunces no nonesense approch and shite jokes keep me awake till the small hours to :lol:

I liked it last week when one of the corners were effing and blinding in between rounds and the commentator goes " not going to apologise for the swearing, this is boxing "

BN keep it real
Arnie Farnell dropping the C-Bomb at 7.30. Standard BN. Glad Rawling didn't apologise.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by mullenman »

i cancelled after two years

not enough domestic fight cards at all
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by lefty »

I'm surprised the mods have kept the thread alive with FW's passion for litigation lol.
Webbo911
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 07:18

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by Webbo911 »

Been a subscriber since the beginning.

International stuff is still brilliant overall but I agree that the domestic cards have been few and far between. I think I can justify the £12 for now but there needs to be some improvement going forward.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Stuarty30 wrote:I'm a subscriber to BN and have been since day one. I even had another subscription for my laptop when I worked down south. If it goes tits up I'll be gutted but I'm sure someone else will step in. It won't be the same as we won't be getting full cards and whoever takes it on will probably pick and choose what fights they show. That might force Frank to get his finger out!
This. All of this.
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by boxingknockout »

I were surprise that allegedly lasted so long. I just thought it happened too early. With the Internet and many broadcasting options I believe it will change to a PPV model for almost all broadcasts. The consumer will pay for what they want to see, rather than having to subscribe to an actual channel. Look at sky, you can get a Now TV pass If you want a specific event. I mean given the option, why would a pure boxing fan want to pay monthly £25 for a channel (sky sports) that shows very little boxing? And all the big fights are on PPV? It's not sustainable especially when you can, if you know how, get a free stream / kodi.

Who here actually subscribes to sky sports????
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by olij999 »

It's not been up to its previous standard in recent months. But if someone had told me in the early 1990s that 20-odd years later there would be a dedicated boxing channel which I could get for £12 per month, I'd have thought that was fantastic. So I'm still pretty positive about it, and still prefer it to Sky.

But I agree with other posters that it is hard to see how that economic model can be sustained. For that reason, I wish Rainham Steel continuing prosperity...
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3329
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

surfthehurf wrote:Correct Naandrew. Sky Sports are the big boys, BT Sport are leading the rest of the pack. A tie-in between Bxntion and BT is the clear choice. Imagine if you got BN's content and sprinkled it into BT's schedules, you'd start wondering how on earth it existed as a dedicated channel.
Looks like BT have 3 main channels then 6 Extra ones. The network is on the rise, with many having it as part of their broadband package and other Sky subscribers paying extra for the football content. BT might even wait around for FW to retire and/or go bankrupt before dipping their toes into boxing. Then they're not tied down.

Barry McGuigan's Cyclone Promotions have a deal with Channel 5, and there's talk of something happening on ITV. This leaves a list of the following promoters:
  • Hatton
    Hennessy
    PBC (Al Haymon)
    (doubtful) Kellie Maloney
    Hayemaker Promotions
Plus there are the fighters who are free agents or only loosely tied to promoters, such as Eubank Jr and Dave Allen. And the Olympic medallists Joshua Buatsi, Joe Joyce.
It seems to me that BT are shying away from boxing. They used to have a cracking little show every week presented by Dempsey and Woodall which showed extended highlights of allegedly's main weekend fight and then a bit of chit chat. It sunk without a trace.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by slapbangwhallop »

CaptainSpacerod wrote:It seems to me that BT are shying away from boxing. They used to have a cracking little show every week presented by Dempsey and Woodall which showed extended highlights of allegedly's main weekend fight and then a bit of chit chat. It sunk without a trace.
That show with Dempsey, Woodall plus weekly guest was also aired on allegedly and I thought it was the highlight of the week.

Was gutted when it was axed.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by Bricks »

Ive cancelled it. I think they need to get rid of bunce and lillis and have steedman and the younger journos in.a new studio. a new approach. Also they need more interesting filler. 1 boxing classic every 3 weeks doesn't cut it. the American 80s boxing shows cant be that expensive. They should use those as fillers.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by lefty »

Bricks wrote:Ive cancelled it. I think they need to get rid of bunce and lillis and have steedman and the younger journos in.a new studio. a new approach. Also they need more interesting filler. 1 boxing classic every 3 weeks doesn't cut it. the American 80s boxing shows cant be that expensive. They should use those as fillers.
You ageist bastard :OhYes:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/allegedly
Your point is?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by lefty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/allegedly
Your point is?
I saw that the other day. I reckon Frank must have read this thread haha.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by mickey1975 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/allegedly
Your point is?
Why be rude? Wes enjoys posting links to articles and videos that we've all seen days earlier...
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

mickey1975 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/allegedly
Your point is?
Why be rude? Wes enjoys posting links to articles and videos that we've all seen days earlier...
How remiss of me indeed. Profound apologies.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by Bricks »

Supremo wrote:
surfthehurf wrote:
The only elements of Sky Sports boxing that I can whinge about are the pricing and amount of adverts.

:lol: :lol: :lol: Are you for real???

Lack of international coverage.
The refusal to acknowledge that any fight that Sky don't show is relevant or even happening.
Under cards and generally main events full of home fighters getting walkovers against sub standard opposition.
The continual drive to test the public boundaries of acceptability and what they can get away with whilst still charging PPV.
The commentators who follow the party line and say what their paymasters tell them to say.
The insults to the intelligence when they pretend fights are going to be 50/50
The exploitation of the casual fans lack of knowledge and ignoring of anyone with half a clue about boxing.

I could go on all day....
This post needs to be a sticky. Very well put. Adam Smith is the mastermind of all this shite.

Look at when Paul Dempsey was the anchor . He asked the hard questions. Jim Watt was another who said what needed saying but was muzzled the last 5 years of his career. Now all u have is moronic yes men.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by wesshaw1985 »

mickey1975 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/allegedly
Your point is?
Why be rude? Wes enjoys posting links to articles and videos that we've all seen days earlier...
:TU:
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by chad »

Just cancelled B0xnati0n today. They offered me 1 month for £6.00 if I wanted to stay. May look to subscribe again in the new year is the schedule improves.
thatllbeme
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 18 Jun 2012, 16:55

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by thatllbeme »

any news on Pacquiao v Vargas?
CiganoBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by CiganoBoxer »

i cancelled my subscription today,dont get nothing worth watching anymore on it in my opinion .
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by DannyMCR »

CiganoBoxer wrote:i cancelled my subscription today,dont get nothing worth watching anymore on it in my opinion .
I'm guessing you missed the big announcement then?
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by Andrew »

Naandrew wrote:
Fights stateside are crap until Kovalev Ward which is now on Sky. How can October be a bad month in America ?? All down to Uncle Al and HBO.

If the channel does go under I just hope the international fights get picked up.

I've said it for years for Fw to compete with Matchroom they need to move everything to BT?
:OhYes:
CiganoBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: BNation on its last legs?

Post by CiganoBoxer »

DannyMCR wrote:
CiganoBoxer wrote:i cancelled my subscription today,dont get nothing worth watching anymore on it in my opinion .
I'm guessing you missed the big announcement then?
yes mate ,although i can't seem to cancel it on their website
Post Reply