Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Joshua is the most overated boxer in the HW division lol
Ranked 3rd on Box rec but he has only beaten fighters who havent beaten anyone .
Until Joshua beats a proven top 10 fighter he isn't even in the top 5 imo
Ranked 3rd on Box rec but he has only beaten fighters who havent beaten anyone .
Until Joshua beats a proven top 10 fighter he isn't even in the top 5 imo
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Boxing Writer wrote:Enlightened-One wrote: Leapai was so bad, that even 70 y.o. Wlad would look great against him. Against Povetkin Wlad didn't look good too, because while he dominated for 12 rounds, he was constantly missing with a right hand. So, for the last 3 years the only opponent whom Wlad could hit well with a right hand, was Alex Leapai. Against Povetkin his right hand timing looked off, against Pulev he landed only one right hand, and all knockdowns and KO came after his left hook. And he barely landed anything decent against Jennings and Fury. So, yes, Wlad is clearly past his prime.
Whenever I read things like this it makes me think about how all fields of performance can be broken down into so many levels.
Looks like Leapai, who beat the 33-0 Dennis Boytsov (does that mean he was even worse?) is making a comeback...
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I never said the words in that quote. That post has nothing to do with me.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Boxing Writer wrote:Enlightened-One wrote: Leapai was so bad, that even 70 y.o. Wlad would look great against him. Against Povetkin Wlad didn't look good too, because while he dominated for 12 rounds, he was constantly missing with a right hand. So, for the last 3 years the only opponent whom Wlad could hit well with a right hand, was Alex Leapai. Against Povetkin his right hand timing looked off, against Pulev he landed only one right hand, and all knockdowns and KO came after his left hook. And he barely landed anything decent against Jennings and Fury. So, yes, Wlad is clearly past his prime.
Whenever I read things like this it makes me think about how all fields of performance can be broken down into so many levels.
Looks like Leapai, who beat the 33-0 Dennis Boytsov (does that mean he was even worse?) is making a comeback...
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Enlightened-One wrote:I never said the words in that quote. That post has nothing to do with me.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Boxing Writer wrote:
Whenever I read things like this it makes me think about how all fields of performance can be broken down into so many levels.
Looks like Leapai, who beat the 33-0 Dennis Boytsov (does that mean he was even worse?) is making a comeback...
Sorry, I misquoted it. Boxing Writer's words, right?
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
A good comparison. . . Louis vs Marciano.. . . However the reason Louis took the fight with Rocky was because he needed money. I am sure that's not the case with Wlad.
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
actjac wrote:A good comparison. . . Louis vs Marciano.. . . However the reason Louis took the fight with Rocky was because he needed money. I am sure that's not the case with Wlad.
I don't think Wlad has slipped as much as Louis had, and AJ is no Rocky Marciano.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Maybe it isn't, but it's still far better than anything Joshua has displayed.man wrote:i never saw his footwork as a keyLoki wrote:Wlad feet are 10 times better than AJ and he's harder to hit.man wrote: neither is wlad ...
trade of wlad's. maybe there is more
to it that i am aware of. anyways, i
see why wlad's long reign makes him
appear like he could do something in
this fight.
but it definitely make for a very exciting
build up in any case ...
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Joshua is neither as tested or expienced as Rocky was then.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I really can't say.
Joshua is largely untested & Wladimir is ordinarily several leagues ahead of him, but he's in his 41st year & has looked old in his last 2 fights.
We all know that Wladimir doesn't like being hit, although, to be fair to him, nobody outside of Jake LaMotta liked getting hit & Joshua will hit him hard.
He won't be able to man-handle Joshua & he's going to have to mix it up.
I'm tentatively going for Wladimir on points, as I think he might have one last hurrah in him, but it would not surprise me if Joshua smashed him & put paid to him as a force in the division.
Joshua is largely untested & Wladimir is ordinarily several leagues ahead of him, but he's in his 41st year & has looked old in his last 2 fights.
We all know that Wladimir doesn't like being hit, although, to be fair to him, nobody outside of Jake LaMotta liked getting hit & Joshua will hit him hard.
He won't be able to man-handle Joshua & he's going to have to mix it up.
I'm tentatively going for Wladimir on points, as I think he might have one last hurrah in him, but it would not surprise me if Joshua smashed him & put paid to him as a force in the division.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
This outcome is not a given by any sense of the word. Joshua still looks stiff with his form. He doesn't always maximize his length. If he doesn't loosen up, Klitschko has a chance to be in control by using his length to keep Joshua away. Power is probably still there for Klitschko to put Joshua down, too. I think Tony Sims can't neglect this issue much longer. Lewis had similar problems early in his career and Steward got him to loosen up and put his jab out farther to take advantage of Lewis length. Joshua needs the same adjustment. If he does this, its over for Klitschko. If not, we might just see Joshua on his heels most of the night. Joshua has the skill and youth to overwhelm the old man but he can't take him lightly. It's gonna come down to ring generalship, period. All that said, however, I think it comes down to a decision and I'll bank on Joshua to make the adjustment.
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Is this fight happening?
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I actually think Wlad looked to be declining against Pulev too. Obviously he was doing damage, but he was very sloppy and getting hit much more than normal. In fact, the fight started with him immediately getting nailed by a flush jab, causing him to hold and spoil pretty much until he landed the first big left hook on Pulev.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Dec 10th:Cutman Scabbers wrote:Is this fight happening?
http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/10/15/1 ... for-dec-10
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
That's complete nonsense... Of these 2, Wlad is the 1 dimensional fighter. He has No body attack and no inside game. He had no choice but to grab inside, even versus a much taller boxer in Tyson Fury. Let's face it, that wasn't a fight because Wlad could do nothing inside and he didn't have the range outside.tigermoth87 wrote:Wlad hasn't looked great in his last couple of fights but AJ's best win is over Brezeale who should have lost to Fred Kassi.
AJ is too basic and one dimensional, Wlad will beat him quite easily.
On the other hand Joshua has a terrific jab and possibly the best right hand counter ever... And when the action goes inside WK will try his best to grab and hold -- but AJ is too powerful and slick on the inside. He has some of the best short hooks and uppercuts in the business. He finished Dillian Whyte off with a savage uppercut that Whyte never saw coming. Wladimir never heard of an uppercut.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I think you confuse Wilder and AJ, don't you?Grailer wrote:Joshua is the most overated boxer in the HW division lol
Ranked 3rd on Box rec but he has only beaten fighters who havent beaten anyone .
Until Joshua beats a proven top 10 fighter he isn't even in the top 5 imo
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
It's much easier to look great when you're fighting weak opposition.Kalan wrote:That's complete nonsense... Of these 2, Wlad is the 1 dimensional fighter. He has No body attack and no inside game. He had no choice but to grab inside, even versus a much taller boxer in Tyson Fury. Let's face it, that wasn't a fight because Wlad could do nothing inside and he didn't have the range outside.tigermoth87 wrote:Wlad hasn't looked great in his last couple of fights but AJ's best win is over Brezeale who should have lost to Fred Kassi.
AJ is too basic and one dimensional, Wlad will beat him quite easily.
On the other hand Joshua has a terrific jab and possibly the best right hand counter ever... And when the action goes inside WK will try his best to grab and hold -- but AJ is too powerful and slick on the inside. He has some of the best short hooks and uppercuts in the business. He finished Dillian Whyte off with a savage uppercut that Whyte never saw coming. Wladimir never heard of an uppercut.
Lets see how slick he is when he's not fighting someone incased in quicksand that should've lost his last two fights against journeymen.
Lets see if his power is as devastating against someone that knows what to do when hit.
Lets see if he's as inpressive when he's fighting someone that's been in with the best, not just Minto or Zoltan Csala.
Joshua could win this, but this is by far the biggest step up in his career, and he's really not shown he has the tools for the job yet.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).asdfjkl wrote:I think you confuse Wilder and AJ, don't you?Grailer wrote:Joshua is the most overated boxer in the HW division lol
Ranked 3rd on Box rec but he has only beaten fighters who havent beaten anyone .
Until Joshua beats a proven top 10 fighter he isn't even in the top 5 imo
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
tigermoth87 wrote:I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).asdfjkl wrote:I think you confuse Wilder and AJ, don't you?Grailer wrote:Joshua is the most overated boxer in the HW division lol
Ranked 3rd on Box rec but he has only beaten fighters who havent beaten anyone .
Until Joshua beats a proven top 10 fighter he isn't even in the top 5 imo
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I don't rate whyte at all. He's British level, maybe Euro at a stretch. He'd beat shot Arreola, Molina, Cornish, Martin and Shot Kingpin but can't see him beating Stiverne, Duhaupas or Szpilka. Him vs Brezeale would be a 50-50 fight which speaks volumes about AJ's calibre of opponents.asdfjkl wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).asdfjkl wrote: I think you confuse Wilder and AJ, don't you?
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
What on earth makes you people believe Stiverne still even deserves a spot in the top 30? Duhaupas improved after the Wilder fight, because that was the moment he realised there's money in the boxing world. Szpilka became a lot stronger after the Wilder fight as well, but still doesn't seem impressive to me and his stamina isn't that good in the later rounds.tigermoth87 wrote:I don't rate whyte at all. He's British level, maybe Euro at a stretch. He'd beat shot Arreola, Molina, Cornish, Martin and Shot Kingpin but can't see him beating Stiverne, Duhaupas or Szpilka. Him vs Brezeale would be a 50-50 fight which speaks volumes about AJ's calibre of opponents.asdfjkl wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:
I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Szpilka became a lot stronger after the Wilder fight? He hasn't fought since you joker.asdfjkl wrote:What on earth makes you people believe Stiverne still even deserves a spot in the top 30? Duhaupas improved after the Wilder fight, because that was the moment he realised there's money in the boxing world. Szpilka became a lot stronger after the Wilder fight as well, but still doesn't seem impressive to me and his stamina isn't that good in the later rounds.tigermoth87 wrote:I don't rate whyte at all. He's British level, maybe Euro at a stretch. He'd beat shot Arreola, Molina, Cornish, Martin and Shot Kingpin but can't see him beating Stiverne, Duhaupas or Szpilka. Him vs Brezeale would be a 50-50 fight which speaks volumes about AJ's calibre of opponents.asdfjkl wrote:
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNp_bKyVR5EKiller Blow wrote:Szpilka became a lot stronger after the Wilder fight? He hasn't fought since you joker.asdfjkl wrote:What on earth makes you people believe Stiverne still even deserves a spot in the top 30? Duhaupas improved after the Wilder fight, because that was the moment he realised there's money in the boxing world. Szpilka became a lot stronger after the Wilder fight as well, but still doesn't seem impressive to me and his stamina isn't that good in the later rounds.tigermoth87 wrote:
I don't rate whyte at all. He's British level, maybe Euro at a stretch. He'd beat shot Arreola, Molina, Cornish, Martin and Shot Kingpin but can't see him beating Stiverne, Duhaupas or Szpilka. Him vs Brezeale would be a 50-50 fight which speaks volumes about AJ's calibre of opponents.
https://www.instagram.com/artur_szpilka/
Judge for yourself... I estimate he gained about 10 pounds of muscle, if not more.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
Joshua didn't fight current Whyte, he fought out of shape, "I train myself" Whyte. And what's Whyte done to make you think that? Knocking out someone faster than Tony Bellew? Out pointing someone an area level fighter? Retiring someone in round 10 that can barely go 4?asdfjkl wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).asdfjkl wrote: I think you confuse Wilder and AJ, don't you?
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
I think Whyte comfortably beats Breazeale. He beats all of AJ's opponents, while I fancy him to have a decent chance against all Wilder's opponents too. I didn't really rate Szpilka, but thought he had a commendable performance against Wilder, so that would definitely be close. Stiverne is shot to sh*t and Duhaupas would be a good fight but still see Whyte edging it. There's a lot of discussion as to how good Whyte is, but I think he's very quickly adding an improved game to his already pre-existing good attributes (power and chin). I think Whyte will beat Chisora next time out.tigermoth87 wrote:I don't rate whyte at all. He's British level, maybe Euro at a stretch. He'd beat shot Arreola, Molina, Cornish, Martin and Shot Kingpin but can't see him beating Stiverne, Duhaupas or Szpilka. Him vs Brezeale would be a 50-50 fight which speaks volumes about AJ's calibre of opponents.asdfjkl wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:
I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wladimir Klitschko vs. Anthony Joshua
KOing 3 different guys out faster then Parker seemed more impressive. Somehow Whyte was indeed not 100% against AJ, but AJ already waited for several months before that fight. In the beginning they were planning the fight on 12 september 2015, but Whyte said he was injured and not ready for AJ, he could fight somehow. Now AJ waited and fought someone else, but wasn't planning to wait forever. Also note that AJ straight away said he wanted a rematch, probably because he felt embarrassed. AJ learned a lot from that fight, it was probably one of the best things that could happen to him at the time without losing too much face. Before Whyte everything went so easy he thought he was superman.BitPlayer wrote:Joshua didn't fight current Whyte, he fought out of shape, "I train myself" Whyte. And what's Whyte done to make you think that? Knocking out someone faster than Tony Bellew? Out pointing someone an area level fighter? Retiring someone in round 10 that can barely go 4?asdfjkl wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:
I criticise Wilder a lot but his top 5 wins (Stiverne, Duhaupas, Szpilka, Molina and Arreola) are far better than AJ's top 5 (Brezeale, Whyte, Martin, Johnson and Cornish).
AJ's best opponent should arguably have lost to Fred Kassi and the other three names feature British Level Dillian Whyte, the worst heavyweight champ ever, a completely shot Kevin Johnson and Area Level Gary Cornish.
Current Whyte would win against them all, especially at the time Wilder fought them, and the way AJ was dominating was far more impressing as Wilder his wins.