David Haye 10th December

asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

lefty wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:As expected, Daffy is after a big payday without any risk, Briggs is after a good fight and good opponent and doesn't care about money.


Whoever Daffy his next opponent is, he should feel ashamed.
Sorry but that's bollocks. Money is the main motivating factor for him at this point.
Yea lol, but the main motivation for Wilder is his daughter and for Haye it's unify the division right?
Imo it's ridiculous if Haye earned a world titlefight thanks to Mark Demorie or/and Arnold, the 100 year old Schwarzenegger would probably have showed a better performance.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by broomy7s »

I'm with stujones on this. I'll be very surprised if it's not Lucas Browne.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by PredatorHayds »

Syntax Error wrote:
PredatorHayds wrote:Chisora is far better than Briggs.

And Briggs only motivation to still be boxing is £££.

Quite possible Haye fights Wlad for the vacant WBA on Wlads already pencilled in German date.
Toeminator 2: Non Judgement Day! :brick:
Someone's toe has got to go.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Taansend »

asdfjkl wrote:
Controversial wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:As expected, Daffy is after a big payday without any risk, Briggs is after a good fight and good opponent and doesn't care about money.


Whoever Daffy his next opponent is, he should feel ashamed.
According to Haye Briggs only wants the fight on PPV. He said he'd happily fight him on 'Dave' but Briggs doesn't want it as not enough money and no chance they could get a PPV deal. He has said once he wins a title he will fight Briggs on PPV.
One side story, Briggs said Haye lies and he can actually be proven right
Would you like to share this proof?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

emallini wrote:Briggs wanted 2 million dollars. He's lost his mind.
What makes you think that lol?! I've never heard Briggs saying that.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

Taansend wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Controversial wrote:
According to Haye Briggs only wants the fight on PPV. He said he'd happily fight him on 'Dave' but Briggs doesn't want it as not enough money and no chance they could get a PPV deal. He has said once he wins a title he will fight Briggs on PPV.
One side story, Briggs said Haye lies and he can actually be proven right
Would you like to share this proof?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcw0AX6SRVg
All over youtube in fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp8lum3DjTM
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Killer Blow »

If not Bellew I'm thinking Hughie.

WBO rankings:
1. Parker
2. Wlad
3. Ruiz
4. Haye
5. Hughie

Wlad fights AJ, Parker and Ruiz fight for the vacant belt and Haye and Hughie fight a final eliminator. Both have been linked with the same date as well.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Taansend »

asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: One side story, Briggs said Haye lies and he can actually be proven right
Would you like to share this proof?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcw0AX6SRVg
All over youtube in fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp8lum3DjTM
This isn't proof. This is just he said/he said.

You said you had proof, not the opinion of one side.

Where's the proof, asdfjkl?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

Taansend wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Would you like to share this proof?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcw0AX6SRVg
All over youtube in fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp8lum3DjTM
This isn't proof. This is just he said/he said.

You said you had proof, not the opinion of one side.

Where's the proof, asdfjkl?
It's clearly visable that Haye lies, Haye stated openly that he wanted to fight Briggs and even promised Briggs a fight, somehow he's clearly doing everything he can to avoid the fight against Briggs and meanwhile making all kind of contracts to split money between himself and others. In his last match, Briggs was actually even the main moneymaker, somehow Haye walked away with all the money and even acted like he gave money away to that guy that ended in a coma. This while in fact Briggs was the moneymaker that night.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by DannyMCR »

Killer Blow wrote:If not Bellew I'm thinking Hughie.

WBO rankings:
1. Parker
2. Wlad
3. Ruiz
4. Haye
5. Hughie

Wlad fights AJ, Parker and Ruiz fight for the vacant belt and Haye and Hughie fight a final eliminator. Both have been linked with the same date as well.
Can't see Peter putting Hughie in with Haye so soon
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Taansend »

asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
This isn't proof. This is just he said/he said.

You said you had proof, not the opinion of one side.

Where's the proof, asdfjkl?
It's clearly visable that Haye lies, Haye stated openly that he wanted to fight Briggs and even promised Briggs a fight, somehow he's clearly doing everything he can to avoid the fight against Briggs and meanwhile making all kind of contracts to split money between himself and others. In his last match, Briggs was actually even the main moneymaker, somehow Haye walked away with all the money and even acted like he gave money away to that guy that ended in a coma. This while in fact Briggs was the moneymaker that night.
So when you said you had proof you were just offering opinion? You quite rightly said that Haye's side is "One side (of the) story" and then you offer Brigg's side as 'proof'. It's not proof, it's just the other side of the story.

The truth is we don't know what's going on behind the scenes. We only know what each side are telling us.

Personally, I don't give a monkeys whether they're both telling the truth or lying. I'm not that interested in any Briggs fight & Haye needs to step up & fight a decent opponent, and that person isn't Briggs who has only fought one even half decent opponent in the last decade - and we all know what happened there.

Thanks for offering these OPINIONS. Shame about the 'proof'.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

DannyMCR wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:If not Bellew I'm thinking Hughie.

WBO rankings:
1. Parker
2. Wlad
3. Ruiz
4. Haye
5. Hughie

Wlad fights AJ, Parker and Ruiz fight for the vacant belt and Haye and Hughie fight a final eliminator. Both have been linked with the same date as well.
Can't see Peter putting Hughie in with Haye so soon
Hughie and Tyson just took something that wasn't allowed, the additional coke use trick was probably just a trick to cover it up, because that's the substance the whole world knows and all the media loves to write about.
shambles80
Middleweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 26 Jul 2014, 17:11

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by shambles80 »

Has Haye lied? Haye said that briggs wanted PPV and wont accept a few hundred grand for the fight.

Would you PPV for Briggs?!
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

Taansend wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
This isn't proof. This is just he said/he said.

You said you had proof, not the opinion of one side.

Where's the proof, asdfjkl?
It's clearly visable that Haye lies, Haye stated openly that he wanted to fight Briggs and even promised Briggs a fight, somehow he's clearly doing everything he can to avoid the fight against Briggs and meanwhile making all kind of contracts to split money between himself and others. In his last match, Briggs was actually even the main moneymaker, somehow Haye walked away with all the money and even acted like he gave money away to that guy that ended in a coma. This while in fact Briggs was the moneymaker that night.
So when you said you had proof you were just offering opinion? You quite rightly said that Haye's side is "One side (of the) story" and then you offer Brigg's side as 'proof'. It's not proof, it's just the other side of the story.

The truth is we don't know what's going on behind the scenes. We only know what each side are telling us.

Personally, I don't give a monkeys whether they're both telling the truth or lying. I'm not that interested in any Briggs fight & Haye needs to step up & fight a decent opponent, and that person isn't Briggs who has only fought one even half decent opponent in the last decade - and we all know what happened there.

Thanks for offering these OPINIONS. Shame about the 'proof'.
I tell you to look all over youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zs5_y2PqQc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xALjrIVT7UM

It's not that hard is it?
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

lpu03rjs wrote:Has Haye lied? Haye said that briggs wanted PPV and wont accept a few hundred grand for the fight.

Would you PPV for Briggs?!
Where did Briggs talk about PPV at all? Isn't it Haye who spoke about that? While fighting some cruiserweight? It's a bullshit excuse, Briggs even offered to fight for free several times, just like in his last fight.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Taansend »

asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: It's clearly visable that Haye lies, Haye stated openly that he wanted to fight Briggs and even promised Briggs a fight, somehow he's clearly doing everything he can to avoid the fight against Briggs and meanwhile making all kind of contracts to split money between himself and others. In his last match, Briggs was actually even the main moneymaker, somehow Haye walked away with all the money and even acted like he gave money away to that guy that ended in a coma. This while in fact Briggs was the moneymaker that night.
So when you said you had proof you were just offering opinion? You quite rightly said that Haye's side is "One side (of the) story" and then you offer Brigg's side as 'proof'. It's not proof, it's just the other side of the story.

The truth is we don't know what's going on behind the scenes. We only know what each side are telling us.

Personally, I don't give a monkeys whether they're both telling the truth or lying. I'm not that interested in any Briggs fight & Haye needs to step up & fight a decent opponent, and that person isn't Briggs who has only fought one even half decent opponent in the last decade - and we all know what happened there.

Thanks for offering these OPINIONS. Shame about the 'proof'.
I tell you to look all over youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zs5_y2PqQc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xALjrIVT7UM

It's not that hard is it?
:lol:

This may come as a surprise to you but Youtube isn't the best basis for what's going on in contract talks.

Oh no, hang on, I just found THIS video on Youtube. You might be right after all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNi8bK1TTX8

:lol:
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

Taansend wrote:
:lol:

This may come as a surprise to you but Youtube isn't the best basis for what's going on in contract talks.

Oh no, hang on, I just found THIS video on Youtube. You might be right after all

:lol:
If you don't even believe that David Haye clearly contradicts himself after all this then I guess you just live in an imaginary world.
It's so obvious, it's so clear, you would probably even believe it if Haye said he just got pregnant and can't fight for at least 9 months because of that.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Cyclops »

asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
:lol:

This may come as a surprise to you but Youtube isn't the best basis for what's going on in contract talks.

Oh no, hang on, I just found THIS video on Youtube. You might be right after all

:lol:
If you don't even believe that David Haye clearly contradicts himself after all this then I guess you just live in an imaginary world.
It's so obvious, it's so clear, you would probably even believe it if Haye said he just got pregnant and can't fight for at least 9 months because of that.
How come you can punctuate and demonstrate appropriate use of an apostrophe and yet you pretend you don't know the difference between 'that' and 'as' and bang on and on and on about David Haye and Shannon fornicating Briggs? If you're going to troll at least do it about something interesting. You're a pretty sad dude.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by asdfjkl »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Taansend wrote:
:lol:

This may come as a surprise to you but Youtube isn't the best basis for what's going on in contract talks.

Oh no, hang on, I just found THIS video on Youtube. You might be right after all

:lol:
If you don't even believe that David Haye clearly contradicts himself after all this then I guess you just live in an imaginary world.
It's so obvious, it's so clear, you would probably even believe it if Haye said he just got pregnant and can't fight for at least 9 months because of that.
How come you can punctuate and demonstrate appropriate use of an apostrophe and yet you pretend you don't know the difference between 'that' and 'as' and bang on and on and on about David Haye and Shannon effing Briggs? If you're going to troll at least do it about something interesting. You're a pretty sad dude.
English isn't my main language, in fact I've never been in any country in the world with English as a main language. I can speak fluent Dutch, reasonable English, reasonable French and German. Somehow if I translate things I make mistakes. Most things sound correct to me, but I admit, it's absolutely not perfect. If you go to google translate and fill in "naked niggers" and translate it to Chinese and then translate it back again to English you'll see it translates to something else as well, you can try it for yourself. Such mistakes happen. And about Briggs, I feel sorry for him, he's ready to show his skill for many years now, but people keep on bullshitting that Daddy Haye, Malik Scott, Browne, Chisora, Teper, Stiverne, and name them are somebodys, while in fact Briggs has at least a fair chance to beat them. I won't say Briggs is a top contender, but I think he's at least compareble to Chisora.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3166
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Grilling Machine »

asdfjkl wrote:Hughie and Tyson just took something that wasn't allowed
Who hasn't?
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Cyclops »

asdfjkl wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: If you don't even believe that David Haye clearly contradicts himself after all this then I guess you just live in an imaginary world.
It's so obvious, it's so clear, you would probably even believe it if Haye said he just got pregnant and can't fight for at least 9 months because of that.
How come you can punctuate and demonstrate appropriate use of an apostrophe and yet you pretend you don't know the difference between 'that' and 'as' and bang on and on and on about David Haye and Shannon effing Briggs? If you're going to troll at least do it about something interesting. You're a pretty sad dude.
English isn't my main language, in fact I've never been in any country in the world with English as a main language. I can speak fluent Dutch, reasonable English, reasonable French and German. Somehow if I translate things I make mistakes. Most things sound correct to me, but I admit, it's absolutely not perfect. If you go to google translate and fill in "naked niggers" and translate it to Chinese and then translate it back again to English you'll see it translates to something else as well, you can try it for yourself. Such mistakes happen. And about Briggs, I feel sorry for him, he's ready to show his skill for many years now, but people keep on bullshitting that Daddy Haye, Malik Scott, Browne, Chisora, Teper, Stiverne, and name them are somebodys, while in fact Briggs has at least a fair chance to beat them. I won't say Briggs is a top contender, but I think he's at least compareble to Chisora.
No he isn't. He's ancient and shite, shot to bits and in a desperate search for a payday. I personally can't fornicating stand him and a lot of sensible boxing fans feel the same. You feel sorry for Briggs? That's very sweet of you. But most of us just wish he would fornicate off. A fight with Briggs is a wasted fight. He's AWFUL. Shut up about it. Seriously. You have more posts than me and I bet 80% are about what a coward David Haye is, and the other 20% will be either sucking off Shannon Briggs or saying stupid shit like you don't care about any other division than heavyweight because the average Dutchman would be able to beat up Floyd Mayweather.

And do me a favor, mate. You're using abbreviations and structuring sentences in a way that you just wouldn't be able to do if you were half as retarded as you pretend to be. You've been picked up on confusing "as" and "than" so many times (one frustrated poster- I forget who- just repeated "IT'S THAN NOT AS IT'S THAN NOT AS" in capitals for about a paragraph to you, and you still keep doing it so you're blatantly on the wind up. I've actually got you on ignore, but people keep on quoting you so I'm forced to read your repetitive, purposefully cretinous statements anyway.

Just change the record, dude.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Killer Blow »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote: How come you can punctuate and demonstrate appropriate use of an apostrophe and yet you pretend you don't know the difference between 'that' and 'as' and bang on and on and on about David Haye and Shannon effing Briggs? If you're going to troll at least do it about something interesting. You're a pretty sad dude.
English isn't my main language, in fact I've never been in any country in the world with English as a main language. I can speak fluent Dutch, reasonable English, reasonable French and German. Somehow if I translate things I make mistakes. Most things sound correct to me, but I admit, it's absolutely not perfect. If you go to google translate and fill in "naked niggers" and translate it to Chinese and then translate it back again to English you'll see it translates to something else as well, you can try it for yourself. Such mistakes happen. And about Briggs, I feel sorry for him, he's ready to show his skill for many years now, but people keep on bullshitting that Daddy Haye, Malik Scott, Browne, Chisora, Teper, Stiverne, and name them are somebodys, while in fact Briggs has at least a fair chance to beat them. I won't say Briggs is a top contender, but I think he's at least compareble to Chisora.
No he isn't. He's ancient and shite, shot to bits and in a desperate search for a payday. I personally can't effing stand him and a lot of sensible boxing fans feel the same. You feel sorry for Briggs? That's very sweet of you. But most of us just wish he would eff off. A fight with Briggs is a wasted fight. He's AWFUL. Shut up about it. Seriously. You have more posts than me and I bet 80% are about what a coward David Haye is, and the other 20% will be either sucking off Shannon Briggs or saying stupid poo like you don't care about any other division than heavyweight because the average Dutchman would be able to beat up Floyd Mayweather.

And do me a favor, mate. You're using abbreviations and structuring sentences in a way that you just wouldn't be able to do if you were half as retarded as you pretend to be. You've been picked up on confusing "as" and "than" so many times (one frustrated poster- I forget who- just repeated "IT'S THAN NOT AS IT'S THAN NOT AS" in capitals for about a paragraph to you, and you still keep doing it so you're blatantly on the wind up. I've actually got you on ignore, but people keep on quoting you so I'm forced to read your repetitive, purposefully cretinous statements anyway.

Just change the record, dude.
He talks way more about Wilder and the American conspiracy than Haye/Briggs.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Cyclops »

Killer Blow wrote:He talks way more about Wilder and the American conspiracy than Haye/Briggs.
Thank Christ I must have missed all of that.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9221
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: David Haye 10th December

Post by Controversial »

asdfjkl wrote:
It's clearly visable that Haye lies, Haye stated openly that he wanted to fight Briggs and even promised Briggs a fight, somehow he's clearly doing everything he can to avoid the fight against Briggs and meanwhile making all kind of contracts to split money between himself and others. In his last match, Briggs was actually even the main moneymaker, somehow Haye walked away with all the money and even acted like he gave money away to that guy that ended in a coma. This while in fact Briggs was the moneymaker that night.
Eh how was Briggs the main moneymaker? Haye was the main fight on the card, most, if not all of the crowd, were there to see him.
Post Reply