Well, you clearly think Hammer and Scott are a cut above him, based on nothing but meaningless stats. Oh sorry, Malik Scott beat a fossilised Tony Thompson to get into the Boxrec top 10. Evidence, if any was needed, that he should be picked every time vs Whyte. Hammer is still shit. He isn't any better now just because he has a 'ranking' after beating a fellow bum in Teper.Horse wrote:Hammer is not in the top 10, he's in the top 20.Riddick Blowe wrote:Who wins if Whyte fought Hammer? Some might say Hammer because...err, Hammer is now in the top 10!
How about Malik Scott vs Whyte?
And why wouldn't people pick Hammer or Scott to beat Whyte?
Do you think Whyte is a really good fighter or something?
BitPlayer said Hammer is in the Boxrec top 10. He's actually just outside, but let me remind you. guys like Glazkov, Browne and Scott are in there. Who suck. You can deduce this by watching footage of them in the ring.
All this will hopefully become clear to you when Joshua bowls over one of these cans to 'prove' what hardly needs to be proved for people who have eyes.