Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

actjac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 566
Joined: 15 Jan 2005, 20:44

Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by actjac »

. . . for the vacant WBA Heavyweight title?. . . .the new champ faces a mandatory of Ustinov-Oquendo winner. . . . Simple..
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Killer Blow »

Exactly.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Badhusker »

Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Carrying a slight knock? :roll:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

Badhusker wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Carrying a slight knock? :roll:
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/1 ... arch-april
http://es.pn/2dQmbH3
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Badhusker »

Enlightened-One wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Carrying a slight knock? :roll:
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/1 ... arch-april
http://es.pn/2dQmbH3

Don't answer my question with two fornicating links to read...or don't bother. I asked a simple question. Maybe it is a common term from wherever you are from, but not in the U.S.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

Badhusker wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
Badhusker wrote:
Carrying a slight knock? :roll:
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/1 ... arch-april
http://es.pn/2dQmbH3

Don't answer my question with two effing links to read...or don't bother. I asked a simple question. Maybe it is a common term from wherever you are from, but not in the U.S.
He's got a pulled muscle on his calf that was slight enough where he could have potentially fought on the 10th December.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Like a Boss »

Oquendo has first call on fighting for the WBA regular title.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by lefty »

Browne wants to make some good money (understandably) - he's not going to make that fighting Ortiz- that aside from the fact Ortiz would very likely knock him out.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46528
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by gilgamesh »

It would make too much sense to have Browne vs Ortiz.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Like a Boss »

The WBA gave Browne and Oquendo 30 days to get a fight set for the regular title back in the first week of September.

That was about 50 days ago and not a word.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Crease »

Like a Boss wrote:The WBA gave Browne and Oquendo 30 days to get a fight set for the regular title back in the first week of September.

That was about 50 days ago and not a word.
Browne was tied up with the legality of his controversial victory over Chagaev.
His A sample came back as positive, but his B sample came back as negative.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Crease »

Like a Boss wrote:Oquendo has first call on fighting for the WBA regular title.
With David Haye being the mandatory challenger for the winner...
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Like a Boss »

Crease wrote:
Like a Boss wrote:The WBA gave Browne and Oquendo 30 days to get a fight set for the regular title back in the first week of September.

That was about 50 days ago and not a word.
Browne was tied up with the legality of his controversial victory over Chagaev.
His A sample came back as positive, but his B sample came back as negative.
Not the way it happened actually.

A pre-fight test showed a negative result for Browne. So he was found to be clean.

A second test, post fight, showed a positive result. I don't think Browne even pursued the B sample from the second test.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by BitPlayer »

Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by asdfjkl »

Ortiz is busy, I guess AJ vs Browne is the best option left.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

BitPlayer wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
A shot at their "regular" title, the one he used to hold, not Fury's old "super" title. However, the WBA subsequently announced their intention to banish the lightly-regarded "regular" strap. So anything goes in this scenario, depending on the WBA's legal liability to fulfil Browne's compensation.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Killer Blow »

asdfjkl wrote:Ortiz is busy, I guess AJ vs Browne is the best option left.
He's not busy. He's pencilled in for December 10. He's available for the WBA strap.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Brute »

Enlightened-One wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
A shot at their "regular" title, the one he used to hold, not Fury's old "super" title. However, the WBA subsequently announced their intention to banish the lightly-regarded "regular" strap. So anything goes in this scenario, depending on the WBA's legal liability to fulfil Browne's compensation.
Klitschko is reported to have pulled up lame. Super titles are only when two organisation belts are held by the same fighter.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

Brute wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
A shot at their "regular" title, the one he used to hold, not Fury's old "super" title. However, the WBA subsequently announced their intention to banish the lightly-regarded "regular" strap. So anything goes in this scenario, depending on the WBA's legal liability to fulfil Browne's compensation.
Klitschko is reported to have pulled up lame. Super titles are only when two organisation belts are held by the same fighter.
You're absolutely correct, but someone named a fighter last week that held that status without having held multiple belts (Felix Sturm and Jezreel Corrales I think), which I accept is a very remote exception to the general rule. So I'm probably wrong about my assumption that Klitschko would be granted a shot at the WBA title before Browne because of his higher ranking.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Brute »

Enlightened-One wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:Klitschko is rated above Browne and he's only carrying a slight knock.
Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
A shot at their "regular" title, the one he used to hold, not Fury's old "super" title. However, the WBA subsequently announced their intention to banish the lightly-regarded "regular" strap. So anything goes in this scenario, depending on the WBA's legal liability to fulfil Browne's compensation.
In most divisions the WBA has only the "regular"world champion, although some years back it managed to have 2 or 3 featherweight super world champions at onc.

Must have been hard up for licencing fees. :OhYes:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Enlightened-One »

Brute wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: Yeah but Browne won a shot of the title in court.
A shot at their "regular" title, the one he used to hold, not Fury's old "super" title. However, the WBA subsequently announced their intention to banish the lightly-regarded "regular" strap. So anything goes in this scenario, depending on the WBA's legal liability to fulfil Browne's compensation.
In most divisions the WBA has only the "regular"world champion, although some years back it managed to have 2 or 3 featherweight super world champions at onc.

Must have been hard up for licencing fees. :OhYes:
Up until a few weeks ago, the WBA had champions holding various titles, such as their: “Unified”; “Super”; “Undisputed”; “Regular”; and their “Interim” champions.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by asdfjkl »

Killer Blow wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:Ortiz is busy, I guess AJ vs Browne is the best option left.
He's not busy. He's pencilled in for December 10. He's available for the WBA strap.
Ah, I didn't realise he planned two fights before the end of this year. I'd love to see an Ortiz AJ fight then.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by Killer Blow »

asdfjkl wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:Ortiz is busy, I guess AJ vs Browne is the best option left.
He's not busy. He's pencilled in for December 10. He's available for the WBA strap.
Ah, I didn't realise he planned two fights before the end of this year. I'd love to see an Ortiz AJ fight then.
No chance. It will happen next summer at the earliest, if it happens at all.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Why not Lucas Browne vs Luis Ortiz. . .

Post by davie »

Does anyone else just wish the WBA would fvck off?
Post Reply