ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:A fossilised Tony Thompson! Which propelled Scott into the top 10 making him awesome and someone Joshua has to 'prove himself' against!
Better than anyone that Joshua has beaten.
I did a shit this morning that smelt nicer than the one I did yesterday.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Horse »

Riddick Blowe wrote:I did a poo this morning that smelt nicer than the one I did yesterday.
Why are you so happy for Joshua to fight awful opposition?
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by rossij8 »

Horse wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:I did a poo this morning that smelt nicer than the one I did yesterday.
Why are you so happy for Joshua to fight awful opposition?
They all do, Fury fought no one prior to his big chance - I always rated him from the start and knew he would have a great chance against Wlad
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Horse »

rossij8 wrote:They all do, Fury fought no one prior to his big chance - I always rated him from the start and knew he would have a great chance against Wlad
Fury had a much better record before the Wlad fight than Joshua does now.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
rossij8 wrote:They all do, Fury fought no one prior to his big chance - I always rated him from the start and knew he would have a great chance against Wlad
Fury had a much better record before the Wlad fight than Joshua does now.
Naw
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by asdfjkl »

Horse wrote:
rossij8 wrote:They all do, Fury fought no one prior to his big chance - I always rated him from the start and knew he would have a great chance against Wlad
Fury had a much better record before the Wlad fight than Joshua does now.
Like... No?
AJ clearly got a better record as Fury had. Even if Fury had won everything with early KOs as well.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by tigermoth87 »

asdfjkl wrote:
Horse wrote:
rossij8 wrote:They all do, Fury fought no one prior to his big chance - I always rated him from the start and knew he would have a great chance against Wlad
Fury had a much better record before the Wlad fight than Joshua does now.
Like... No?
AJ clearly got a better record as Fury had. Even if Fury had won everything with early KOs as well.

Nah, Furys wins over Cunningham, Chisora and Hammer are better than anyone on Joshua's resume.

All 3 would beat Breazeale and Whyte who are Ajs best wins.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by asdfjkl »

tigermoth87 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote:
Horse wrote:Fury had a much better record before the Wlad fight than Joshua does now.
Like... No?
AJ clearly got a better record as Fury had. Even if Fury had won everything with early KOs as well.

Nah, Furys wins over Cunningham, Chisora and Hammer are better than anyone on Joshua's resume.

All 3 would beat Breazeale and Whyte who are Ajs best wins.
I think Whyte would win against Chisora and Hammer, Cunningham not sure, Cunningham will never be able to KO him, but he might win on points by running around like a chicken, like David Haye.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Horse »

tigermoth87 wrote:Nah, Furys wins over Cunningham, Chisora and Hammer are better than anyone on Joshua's resume.

All 3 would beat Breazeale and Whyte who are Ajs best wins.
People shouldn't need telling this.

Fury's record is clearly better.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by tigermoth87 »

asdfjkl wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:
asdfjkl wrote: Like... No?
AJ clearly got a better record as Fury had. Even if Fury had won everything with early KOs as well.

Nah, Furys wins over Cunningham, Chisora and Hammer are better than anyone on Joshua's resume.

All 3 would beat Breazeale and Whyte who are Ajs best wins.
I think Whyte would win against Chisora and Hammer, Cunningham not sure, Cunningham will never be able to KO him, but he might win on points by running around like a chicken, like David Haye.
I really don't get the Whyte hype. He hasn't proved himself against anyone and hasn't looked that impressive against who he has beat. He did look good for one round vs Joshua though.

Chisora at least beat Helenius, gave a good showing against Klitschko and took Malik Scott's 0
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by crusader »

Whyte is one of the most overrated fighters in the division. He hasn't beaten anyone in the top 75, and I wouldn't exactly say his wins over area level fighters such as Allen and close to morbidly obese Lewison were impressive.

His big pro achievements are catching an over-eager AJ with a good shot, and beating other fighters' leftovers in quicker fashion (though Chisora, Gerber, and many other lesser names have also stopped common opposition faster than he did).
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by davie »

Joshuas record is appalling for a world title holder with 2 defences.
For a 3 year, 17 fight novice it's half respectable but we judge it based on the hype and where he has managed to position himself both on the world stage and in the view of the greater public, so it should be judged more harshly.

Joshua has fought absolutely no one of real quality and Fury has many wins which rank above anyone he has faced. The fact that Joshua is winning world titles from and subsequently defending against this calibre of opponent, is the big issue. Fury fought some average fighters and some relatively low risk, well ranked opposition but he did so on the way to a title shot.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:Whyte is one of the most overrated fighters in the division. He hasn't beaten anyone in the top 75, and I wouldn't exactly say his wins over area level fighters such as Allen and close to morbidly obese Lewison were impressive.

His big pro achievements are catching an over-eager AJ with a good shot, and beating other fighters' leftovers in quicker fashion (though Chisora, Gerber, and many other lesser names have also stopped common opposition faster than he did).
Think all actual boxing fans are aware of this.

Whyte is British level at the moment and done nothing to suggest he is more than that.
rm1
Middleweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 02 Feb 2013, 11:11

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by rm1 »

If Whyte beats Chisora he will have proved himself at world level. I think he will as he is a much improved fighter of late.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by BitPlayer »

Cunningham legitmately beat a Mansour in better shape than the one that gave Breazeale a beating.

As for Whyte vs those guys, in shape Whyte is a decent match up, fat Whyte that trains himself and has a shoulder problem really doesn't. THough like in the Teper fight Hammer could likely out stamina Whyte to get the win, unless there was British scoring.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: ERKEN TEPER SPOILER

Post by Oiky »

Teper is jank
Post Reply