Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Laraboxing_rocks wrote:Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.
De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.Keko wrote:Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Laraboxing_rocks wrote:Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.boxing_rocks wrote:What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.Keko wrote:Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Laraboxing_rocks wrote:
Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.
The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
I am guessing English is not a strength of yoursKeko wrote:So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.boxing_rocks wrote:What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.Keko wrote:
Realistically it's better than Muray and Lem and are not they Floyd and Lara
The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
Is not, better know Italian, Spanish, Croatian, German? You know that a foreign language?boxing_rocks wrote:I am guessing English is not a strength of yoursKeko wrote:So are not these two just a measure of quality. I do not have to explain I guess. You talk about them as if they were the best of the best. He just would not they beat Canelo. GGG probably would have won.boxing_rocks wrote:
What is better than Murray and Lemieux ? We are talking about boxing skills, not quality of opposition, especially opposition Canelo was humiliated by.
The point is that if the two of them some big wins then this is ridiculous.
G is super interesting to me not you got it wrong, and not against .
I'm trying.
But in fact it's not a big problem and only mention in connection Canelo / Murray
-
SenorPipino
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 6055
- Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.boxing_rocks wrote:Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.
In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.
It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.
-
nuthin4sumpthin
- Welterweight
- Posts: 36
- Joined: 19 Jun 2015, 19:30
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
Just like Maidana was "completely impotent" against Floyd the technician?SenorPipino wrote:Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.boxing_rocks wrote:Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.Keko wrote:Canelo is the better boxer of the two mentioned.
In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.
It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.
Go ahead and tell me how Maidana is more skilled than Golovkin
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: De La Hoya: Golovkin is running from Canelo
Exactly. Mayweather would end the same way as Brook.nuthin4sumpthin wrote:Just like Maidana was "completely impotent" against Floyd the technician?SenorPipino wrote:Yeah, and I'd like to see if Mr. 150,000 could fathom the style of Mayweather.boxing_rocks wrote:
Bullshit. The "better boxer" looks like a dummy when he faces technicians like Floyd or Lara.
In a P4P fight, Golovkin would be completely impotent against a technician like Money.
It would be a 12 round one-sided bitch slapping.
Go ahead and tell me how Maidana is more skilled than Golovkin