Quigg v McDonnell
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Disgusting fight.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Horse wrote:Disgusting fight.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Has Quigg not moved up to feather? McDonnell is still a Bantam. Can't see it happening anytime soon.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
McDonnell has plenty of good fights for him at bantamweight and Quigg has plenty of good fights for him at super bantamweight.
What's the point of this?
This is one of the worst possible fights that can be made in world boxing right now.
Let us all pray that this abominable fight is not made.
What's the point of this?
This is one of the worst possible fights that can be made in world boxing right now.
Let us all pray that this abominable fight is not made.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
In that article it says quigg had said that his December 10th fight at featherweight will be a one off seems a bit far fetched considering fastcar has said it's a world title eliminator
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Horse wrote:McDonnell has plenty of good fights for him at bantamweight and Quigg has plenty of good fights for him at super bantamweight.
What's the point of this?
This is one of the worst possible fights that can be made in world boxing right now.
Let us all pray that this abominable fight is not made.
Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.
I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight
Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
It doesn't matter who would win.davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.
I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight
Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.
Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
There's no chance of this fight happening.Horse wrote:It doesn't matter who would win.davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.
I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight
Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.
Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Because God would not allow it?Boxerbeetle wrote:There's no chance of this fight happening.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.Horse wrote:Because God would not allow it?Boxerbeetle wrote:There's no chance of this fight happening.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Then God has no mercy?Boxerbeetle wrote:God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.
Eddie is a good man who will protect us from such wickedness?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.Horse wrote:Then God has no mercy?Boxerbeetle wrote:God wouldn't mind seeing the fight, it's Eddie who won't allow it.
Eddie is a good man who will protect us from such wickedness?
Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
I think Quigg wins he's to strong for Jaime imo, Jaime has a good engine but so has Quigg and I'd see a late stoppage for Quigg, a fight I'd certainly look forward to though
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
It doesn't really seem like a big fight.keirw wrote:Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.
Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.
Wouldn't he make more if he went to Japan to fight Yamanaka?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Mcdonnell would, but would Eddie?Horse wrote:It doesn't really seem like a big fight.keirw wrote:Eddie's accountant is God as far as this fight is concerned, if the numbers add up even Moses himself won't be able to stop this fight from happening.
Fortunately Quigg and his team have their sights set on much bigger paydays so I can't see the fight happening in the near future.
Wouldn't he make more if he went to Japan to fight Yamanaka?
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Horse wrote:It doesn't matter who would win.davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.
I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight
Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.
Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
Would you prefer to see Sprott v Skelton again over this?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Of course.forcefraser wrote:Would you prefer to see Sprott v Skelton again over this?
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
Yet for some reason you want to see Bellew vs Haye.Horse wrote:It doesn't matter who would win.davie wrote:Bit heavy on the hyperbole Hoss, but your right. No need.
I think both men could step up a weight class to be fair though, quite comfortably. But as others have pointed out there is plenty for each at their own weight
Out of interest, how do you see it going, the poll is fairly split. There may be a weight class between them and they're both reasonably solid world level fighters.
This fight would break my heart more than almost any other fight that could be made right now.
Both fighters have real potential. Please, can anyone with any influence try to stop this shameful fight from happening?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
That fight is less likely to ruin good potential future fights for either of them.Killer Blow wrote:Yet for some reason you want to see Bellew vs Haye.
If McDonnell moves up to super bantamweight then he is unlikely to drop back down again for all of the good fights that he can have there.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).Taansend wrote:Quigg v McDonnell
Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.
-
T w_savage
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 04:58
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
I thought there was a plan for quigg to move up a weight? I think this is a 'arum' ( chatting about nonsense fights to keep guys in the public consciousness) .
Both guys have been inactive for various reasons and this 'arum' technique will help raise their profiles.
It's a good fight for Mcdonnell but terrible idea for quigg, it's not worth too much debate though as it simply won't happen.
Both guys have been inactive for various reasons and this 'arum' technique will help raise their profiles.
It's a good fight for Mcdonnell but terrible idea for quigg, it's not worth too much debate though as it simply won't happen.
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
He is and he will. He's be campaigning now as a Featherweight.T w_savage wrote:I thought there was a plan for quigg to move up a weight?
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
It could ruin McDonnell's career and will do very little for Quigg.Crease wrote:The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).
Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.
It's just an awful fight.
-
T w_savage
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 04:58
Re: Quigg v McDonnell
It's a promotional ploy, nothing more.Horse wrote:It could ruin McDonnell's career and will do very little for Quigg.Crease wrote:The fight doesn't interest me, they are both good fighters, but the size difference would be telling (yet again).
Realistically, this would be another Brook vs Gavin all over again, with the smaller man getting bashed up.
It's just an awful fight.
It's to get fans talking and stir up social media, there is no money in the fight to set off the risk to both men... Quigg brings little after his abysmal showing vs frampton ( split decision
Put them together ... Still no money, it's not PPv and won't boost either mans profile to make it worth losing money over..
Seriously, won't happen! Just a trick to get you all chatting..