BT Sports

maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

BT Sports

Post by maverick23 »

allegedly has just announced he's done a deal for 20 live UK shows next year on BT Sports. Those shows will also be aired on allegedly.

Very interesting news. Great for Warren but could be the end of allegedly.
Terry Dooley
Welterweight
Posts: 1664
Joined: 25 Nov 2015, 09:07

Re: BT Sports

Post by Terry Dooley »

maverick23 wrote:allegedly has just announced he's done a deal for 20 live UK shows next year on BT Sports. Those shows will also be aired on allegedly.

Very interesting news. Great for Warren but could be the end of allegedly.
Quotes are here: http://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2016/11/ ... ts-a-year/. It says multi-year with 20 shows on BT/BN and 10 solely on BN.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: BT Sports

Post by DannyMCR »

This is great news for British Boxing, looking forward to seeing how this pans out!
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: BT Sports

Post by afcmarshall »

So if you already have bt sport am i right in thinking you will have to pay £12. a month to just watch 10 events through the year
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: BT Sports

Post by rd350lc »

DannyMCR wrote:This is great news for British Boxing, looking forward to seeing how this pans out!
agree its good news about the amount of bills , but will it be any different to paying Bnation direct ?

would have been better if the deal was done with a free to air station .
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2177
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: BT Sports

Post by tony1234 »

Could be the end of Hearn and his stacked cards, BT will want to serve it up to SKY so will want some decent names on their bills
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: BT Sports

Post by bfchunk »

You won't need to pay extra for allegedly. The channel will be added as part of the BT subscription package. Happy days for those presently paying for both BT and allegedly. Let's hope the collaboration works out long term and does not fizzle out, inc the commitment allegedly has for the international fights, which is the
best part for me.

Will Ian Darke commentate on some of the bigger fights?

Could BT move towards some "PPV" events? (Yuk)
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: BT Sports

Post by ste1983 »

afcmarshall wrote:So if you already have bt sport am i right in thinking you will have to pay £12. a month to just watch 10 events through the year
10 extra UK events plus the international output yeah?

May not seem great for allegedly really but overall it gotta be good news for their fighters/fights. I'd say they've realistically hit a glass celling with subscribers people who subscribe now are probably hardcore and will continue to do for the international stuff plus those extra shows (or if they don't have BT).
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: BT Sports

Post by Sklar »

Good news.
T w_savage
Super Lightweight
Posts: 106
Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 04:58

Re: BT Sports

Post by T w_savage »

This is great, simply warren needed a larger audience to build his stable and now he's got it. Let's hope some other promoters get in on this too.

Now warren has his path to PPv back as he can realistically build fights up again.. Still I think BN needs to looks at putting ten cards a year on itv too.

U.K. Boxing needed this..
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: BT Sports

Post by Andrew »

bfchunk wrote:You won't need to pay extra for allegedly. The channel will be added as part of the BT subscription package. Happy days for those presently paying for both BT and allegedly. Let's hope the collaboration works out long term and does not fizzle out, inc the commitment allegedly has for the international fights, which is the
best part for me.

Will Ian Darke commentate on some of the bigger fights?

Could BT move towards some "PPV" events? (Yuk)
Yes it is mentioned in the article.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: BT Sports

Post by milpool »

This could provide the competition that British Boxing needed. Sky and Hearn have been pretty much unopposed recently, hopefully this will mean that Matchroom have to up their game and serve up some decent bouts and, with a bit of BT Money behind them, BN and Worrun can start delivering some decent shows too.
I think this is a good thing :TU:
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: BT Sports

Post by DannyMCR »

rd350lc wrote:
DannyMCR wrote:This is great news for British Boxing, looking forward to seeing how this pans out!
agree its good news about the amount of bills , but will it be any different to paying Bnation direct ?

would have been better if the deal was done with a free to air station .
By the looks of it, you can cancel you BN subscription in the new year if you're subscribed to BT Sport. I'm hoping with BT money behind them they can put on bigger shows with stacked cards and also bring some bigger names over!
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13438
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: BT Sports

Post by jameswilson »

tony1234 wrote:Could be the end of Hearn and his stacked cards, BT will want to serve it up to SKY so will want some decent names on their bills
Yeah definitely the end. Just like McGuigan, Warren, Maloney and Hatton was, and just like allegedly PPV was.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: BT Sports

Post by Andrew »

Said it for a while now the only way Warren could compete with Hearn was if everything went on BT

Now this won't mean they will shift more tickets over night but this is only a very good thing for British boxing. I don't expect Frank to be doing massive arena shows and blockbuster fights instantly but this can build towards that.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: BT Sports

Post by JimJim2009 »

Well done Fwank, credit where it's due. I was getting worried BN might be heading down the toilet slowly. Bet Buncey has a big grin tonight.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5172
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: BT Sports

Post by TheLeprechaun »

If this brings Ian Darke back to boxing commentary it would be unbelievable.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: BT Sports

Post by samwbr »

Might even get it in HD on virgin media at last
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: BT Sports

Post by afcmarshall »

ste1983 wrote:
afcmarshall wrote:So if you already have bt sport am i right in thinking you will have to pay £12. a month to just watch 10 events through the year
10 extra UK events plus the international output yeah?

May not seem great for allegedly really but overall it gotta be good news for their fighters/fights. I'd say they've realistically hit a glass celling with subscribers people who subscribe now are probably hardcore and will continue to do for the international stuff plus those extra shows (or if they don't have BT).
Thanks read it quickly at work just saw the ten shows bit and thought that included international hopefully if/when they do ppv subscribers to allegedly won't have to fork out extra
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: BT Sports

Post by Stuarty »

More boxing on TV is a good thing but from a selfish point of view now I am going to have to fork out for BT for shows I would've probably got on my BN subscription. If Warren has signed a deal with BT then he should just wrap BN. Yet more expense to watch my sport. It's becoming a piss take! I'll pay it because boxing is the thing I most look forward to after a hard week and I very rarely get out but it's a lot of money and more earache from the Mrs because of the expense 'just for boxing' blah blah!
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: BT Sports

Post by afcmarshall »

Stuarty30 wrote:More boxing on TV is a good thing but from a selfish point of view now I am going to have to fork out for BT for shows I would've probably got on my BN subscription. If Warren has signed a deal with BT then he should just wrap BN. Yet more expense to watch my sport. It's becoming a piss take! I'll pay it because boxing is the thing I most look forward to after a hard week and I very rarely get out but it's a lot of money and more earache from the Mrs because of the expense 'just for boxing' blah blah!
As far as I could tell if we have allegedly we won't lose out
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: BT Sports

Post by afcmarshall »

Stuarty30 wrote:More boxing on TV is a good thing but from a selfish point of view now I am going to have to fork out for BT for shows I would've probably got on my BN subscription. If Warren has signed a deal with BT then he should just wrap BN. Yet more expense to watch my sport. It's becoming a piss take! I'll pay it because boxing is the thing I most look forward to after a hard week and I very rarely get out but it's a lot of money and more earache from the Mrs because of the expense 'just for boxing' blah blah!
As far as I could tell if we have allegedly we won't lose out
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: BT Sports

Post by Boxerbeetle »

So how long will it be until we have to start referring to BT Sport as B_T Sp0rt to escape the allegedly filter?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: BT Sports

Post by lefty »

You've got to give props to Fwank. Just when you think he's down and out. He pulls something out of the bag again. He's got more lives than a cat.
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 322
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Re: BT Sports

Post by Matt Teague »

TheLeprechaun wrote:If this brings Ian Darke back to boxing commentary it would be unbelievable.
I agree with that ian is a class act
Post Reply