Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED

jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED

Post by jezzamundo »

BWH Rankings as of 22 October 2016:

Champion in Recess: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Joseph Parker
7. Anthony Joshua
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Carlos Takam
10. Vyacheslav Glazkov
11. Lucas Browne
12. Bermane Stiverne
13. Artur Szpilka
14. Dereck Chisora
15. Malik Scott

Topic A - How are the rankings affected by Luis Ortiz's UD12 win over Malik Scott?

My vote: Ortiz remains at #4, Scott OUT.

Note: This topic is for voting on the rankings of Ortiz and Scott. Posting your own top 15 will not count as a vote. Please cast your vote in the manner that I have done above.
Last edited by jezzamundo on 18 Nov 2016, 20:51, edited 1 time in total.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by davie »

Ortiz remains at #4, Scott OUT

Same as you

Nothing there to elevate Ortiz and Scott was borderline top 15 anyway.

If Ortiz does move it wouldn't be up but it would probably be harsh to drop him down, he did what he had to do
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5334
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by greg »

Ortiz remains at #4,
Scott OUT
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Rob3_142 »

Ortiz remains at #4,
Scott OUT

Little argument against anything else. Argument that Scott should have been OUT earlier, and perhaps a demonstration that Ortiz is not as indestructible as once thought.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by BitPlayer »

Ortiz to 5
Scott OUT
HyacinthusTurnipseed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1309
Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by HyacinthusTurnipseed »

Scott out. Ortiz no change.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Horse »

Luis Ortiz - Remains at No. 4
Malik Scott - Remains at No. 15
Tarkus
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Tarkus »

Ortiz to 3 (his record is better then Wilder's)
Scott OUT (man is a disgrace)
the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by the_doctor »

To remove Scott do we not have to establish whether there is anyone worthy to take his place?

Yes, he was boring and yes, he lost but he may still be the 15th best heavyweight in the world at the moment.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Killer Blow »

Ortiz stays at 4

Scott OUT and replaced by Duhaupas
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Rob3_142 »

the_doctor wrote:To remove Scott do we not have to establish whether there is anyone worthy to take his place?

Yes, he was boring and yes, he lost but he may still be the 15th best heavyweight in the world at the moment.
Any recommendations? Does Christian Hammer's win over the previously unbeaten Teper raise him above Scott?

How about Molina's KO win over Adamek? Duhaupas KO win over the formally unbeaten Helenius?

How about Haye? Although I 100% agree that so far since his return he's only fought tosh, I think most would agree that he brings a lot more to the table than Scott.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by crusader »

Ortiz-no change
Scott-out
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Freedom2013 »

Luis Ortiz remains at #4, Malik Scott out.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by mullenman »

Haye Did beat bouncers but they were both inside top 15 of major bodies ratings

How there were I have no idea and thinks it's a disgrace but he still beat two rated fighters so haye in at 15
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Killer Blow »

Rob3_142 wrote:
the_doctor wrote:To remove Scott do we not have to establish whether there is anyone worthy to take his place?

Yes, he was boring and yes, he lost but he may still be the 15th best heavyweight in the world at the moment.
Any recommendations? Does Christian Hammer's win over the previously unbeaten Teper raise him above Scott?

How about Molina's KO win over Adamek? Duhaupas KO win over the formally unbeaten Helenius?

How about Haye? Although I 100% agree that so far since his return he's only fought tosh, I think most would agree that he brings a lot more to the table than Scott.
Absolutely no way should Haye be considered. He shouldn't be allowed to use his reputation as leverage to create an illusion that he's a top contender when he hasn't fought a top 50 opponent in four and a half years.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by crusader »

ABC rankings aren't that relevant to these ones IMO. I think these rankings have most of their value in the fact that we can look past the ABC nonsense.

de Mori and Gjerhaejkdjawj aren't close to being among the best or most proven 15 HWs in the world, although I do think there's a good chance Haye is still among the best despite his recent lack of good wins.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by Rob3_142 »

Killer Blow wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
the_doctor wrote:To remove Scott do we not have to establish whether there is anyone worthy to take his place?

Yes, he was boring and yes, he lost but he may still be the 15th best heavyweight in the world at the moment.
Any recommendations? Does Christian Hammer's win over the previously unbeaten Teper raise him above Scott?

How about Molina's KO win over Adamek? Duhaupas KO win over the formally unbeaten Helenius?

How about Haye? Although I 100% agree that so far since his return he's only fought tosh, I think most would agree that he brings a lot more to the table than Scott.
Absolutely no way should Haye be considered. He shouldn't be allowed to use his reputation as leverage to create an illusion that he's a top contender when he hasn't fought a top 50 opponent in four and a half years.
No, I completely agree. Absolutely no doubt about it. I'm just so underwhelmed by Scott's performance. I think Haye has the tools to be top 5, but unfortunately has shown nothing to deserve being so.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by asdfjkl »

Scott was supposed to be out already because of inactivity, but appearantly that rule only gets applied when you like it to be. Either way, Ortiz rank 8. Not because he should be that low, but I still rank him below Anthony Joshua.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by asdfjkl »

Rob3_142 wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
Any recommendations? Does Christian Hammer's win over the previously unbeaten Teper raise him above Scott?

How about Molina's KO win over Adamek? Duhaupas KO win over the formally unbeaten Helenius?

How about Haye? Although I 100% agree that so far since his return he's only fought tosh, I think most would agree that he brings a lot more to the table than Scott.
Absolutely no way should Haye be considered. He shouldn't be allowed to use his reputation as leverage to create an illusion that he's a top contender when he hasn't fought a top 50 opponent in four and a half years.
No, I completely agree. Absolutely no doubt about it. I'm just so underwhelmed by Scott's performance. I think Haye has the tools to be top 5, but unfortunately has shown nothing to deserve being so.
Jun Long Zhang shows more impressive numbers actually. TBH I consider him to be rank 15.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9457
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by tiny_acres »

asdfjkl wrote:Scott was supposed to be out already because of inactivity, but appearantly that rule only gets applied when you like it to be. Either way, Ortiz rank 8. Not because he should be that low, but I still rank him below Anthony Joshua.
Please go play in high traffic
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9457
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by tiny_acres »

Tarkus wrote:Ortiz to 3 (his record is better then Wilder's)
Scott OUT (man is a disgrace)

Ortiz record is no better than Wilders.
Jennings is over rated and Thompson was 127 yrs old when they fought
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9457
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by tiny_acres »

Ortiz unchanged
Scott drops out
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by jezzamundo »

asdfjkl wrote:Scott was supposed to be out already because of inactivity, but appearantly that rule only gets applied when you like it to be. Either way, Ortiz rank 8. Not because he should be that low, but I still rank him below Anthony Joshua.
Scott was inactive for a year, so his vote was up for vote, but with the fight with Ortiz scheduled so soon afterwards, it was better to wait for that result. I used to create an inactivity topic any time a fighter had been inactive for a year, but in every case where the fighter had a scheduled fight, people voted to leave the rankings as they were until the fight. Realising it was a waste of time, I now only make inactivity topics where the fighter has been inactive for a year and has no scheduled fight within the following 6 months.
the_doctor wrote:To remove Scott do we not have to establish whether there is anyone worthy to take his place?

Yes, he was boring and yes, he lost but he may still be the 15th best heavyweight in the world at the moment.
No, if Scott is removed, the #15 spot will be vacant and we will have a separate topics to determine who is most worthy to fill the spot.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by crusader »

tiny_acres wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Ortiz to 3 (his record is better then Wilder's)
Scott OUT (man is a disgrace)

Ortiz record is no better than Wilders.
Jennings is over rated and Thompson was 127 yrs old when they fought
I have Wilder ahead of Ortiz due to the greater depth of his resume, but has he beaten anyone better than Jennings?
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9457
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings

Post by tiny_acres »

crusader wrote:
tiny_acres wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Ortiz to 3 (his record is better then Wilder's)
Scott OUT (man is a disgrace)

Ortiz record is no better than Wilders.
Jennings is over rated and Thompson was 127 yrs old when they fought
I have Wilder ahead of Ortiz due to the greater depth of his resume, but has he beaten anyone better than Jennings?
I'd argue that Stiverne is was about as good as Jennings.
But depth of schedule Wilder gets him there

I think Ortiz is nearly as over rated as joshua
Post Reply