CaptainSpacerod wrote:People of limited intellect on this forum quickly jump on the lack of respect bandwagon but of course it's not a lack of respect it's merely a critique of a fighter. Anybody in any profession, let alone the brutal world of boxing, who has risen to even a level of national achievement deserves huge respect.
It goes without saying in boxing circles that respect is implicitly given to anyone who climbs in the ring. Only point scoring saddos on anonymous forums will seek to make lack of respect an issue where clearly there isn't one
Stop blathering.
Your post was disrespectful and inaccurate regarding Cleverly's abilities.
Terry O'Connor's a big guy but he must be getting on. Are his joints up still up to picking up Nathan throwing him over his shoulder and carrying him back to his corner?
If so I still think it's a bad idea for Clev and a big comedown for Kovalev if he beats Ward.
Shirow wrote:Terry O'Connor's a big guy but he must be getting on. Are his joints up still up to picking up Nathan throwing him over his shoulder and carrying him back to his corner?
.
Tomasino wrote:Hes brave that's for sure. He's not going to last much longer. I think Nathan could have benefitted from quality training after the Kovalev massacre but he's not going to improve now. Is he still trained by Vince?
Tomasino wrote:Hes brave that's for sure. He's not going to last much longer. I think Nathan could have benefitted from quality training after the Kovalev massacre but he's not going to improve now. Is he still trained by Vince?
Not with vince for a while.
Still with Darren Wilson I think.
Thanks. I've not heard of him, is he good?
Originally a fitness guy but seems a good trainer.
Lack of experience but Nathan has stuck by him despite people saying he'd benefit from moving elsewhere.
As with all trainers the proof is in the pudding and clevs looked alright last two fights.
Any rematch would finish the same way as the first fight. Cleverly hasn't got the tools to hang with a puncher like Kovalev. He's too easy to hit and struggles to box to a plan. I like Clev. He's been in some entertaining fights but he should stay away from Kovalev. Someone earlier in the thread mentioned Stevenson. That's probably a better idea. I'd favour Stevenson but he's getting on a bit and has been pretty inactive so he's more of a chance against the pimp than he has against the Krusher.
I do like the fact Clev is still pissed about that defeat to Kov....like others have said, he's a proud man and clearly wants to fight and beat the best. But I agree that Kovalev would appear to have his number and Nathan would really have to try something different not to end up in a heap again.
However, maybe Ward makes that Kovalev call-out null and void this weekend?
Kovalev would destroy Nathan all over again. Kovalev always will have the beating of him, I would think.
I would much rather see him give a title shot to Forfara.
They had a really exciting fight last time out, it was very back-and-forth all the way through.
As a Clev fan - I was disgusted at his tactics. I believe that had he fought of the back foot & gave himself the space to carefully pick his shots, then he would dictate the pace of the fight, land more punches & get in with the cleaner shots.
So yeah, the Forfara rematch - and it's definitely a winnable fight for him.
Now that Ward has exposed Kovalev as a hype job ( ), does anyone feel Cleverly could handle Kovalev by employing similar tactics? Or does he still get pulverised early?
Crease wrote:
As a Clev fan - I was disgusted at his tactics. I believe that had he fought of the back foot & gave himself the space to carefully pick his shots, then he would dictate the pace of the fight, land more punches & get in with the cleaner shots.
.
So clev, having had a kindly passing brain surgeon completely rewire his entire boxing dna, suddenly becomes a cute standoff counterpuncher?
Crease wrote:Kovalev would destroy Nathan all over again. Kovalev always will have the beating of him, I would think.
I would much rather see him give a title shot to Forfara.
They had a really exciting fight last time out, it was very back-and-forth all the way through.
As a Clev fan - I was disgusted at his tactics. I believe that had he fought of the back foot & gave himself the space to carefully pick his shots, then he would dictate the pace of the fight, land more punches & get in with the cleaner shots.
So yeah, the Forfara rematch - and it's definitely a winnable fight for him.
I would imagine calling Kovalev out is the easy bit until he ends up stood in front of you again. He looked pretty composed, quick and bull strong did the Russian last night.
I could envisage...sorry, I know it was a while back...a kind of Carl Johanneson v Leva Kyrakosyan type scenario.....I’m the new Colin Hart. I’ve got no points of reference from 2016 but shed loads from years ago .
Boxerbeetle wrote:Now that Ward has exposed Kovalev as a hype job ( ), does anyone feel Cleverly could handle Kovalev by employing similar tactics? Or does he still get pulverised early?
His best chance was the first fight and whilst he did adopt the wrong tactics and come into it pretty blind about Kovalev's abilities I don't see how the passing of a few years, where he's been bothering Bellew whilst Kovalev has been fighting at a much high level, is going to change the end result. He'd do better probably but he'd need to get a serious strategist involved and work on it a long time. He's brave and clearly proud and can't fault him for either but I don't see where he has the hand speed, movement, defence or skills that give him the edge here. Other thing is I don't think Cleverly has ever carried the power to match his style but he could box a bit so not sure why he's never changed his style.
), does anyone feel Cleverly could handle Kovalev by employing similar tactics? Or does he still get pulverised early?
.