i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk
I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Don't P4P lists normally include guys that are at least the champion at their own weight?Jip wrote:i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
I haven't done one for ages.
1. Crawford
2. Gonzalez
3. Kovalev
4. Golovkin
5. Lomachenko
6. Ward
7. Spence
8. Rigondeaux
9. Pac
10. Andrade
1. Crawford
2. Gonzalez
3. Kovalev
4. Golovkin
5. Lomachenko
6. Ward
7. Spence
8. Rigondeaux
9. Pac
10. Andrade
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Crawford needs to fight someone good to get that status.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Obviously he doesn't, he's already there.diddy wrote:Crawford needs to fight someone good to get that status.
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
Ward
Krusher
3G
Chocolatito
Hitman Jr.
GingerHead
Pac
Inoue
Lomachenko
Sometimes
Krusher
3G
Chocolatito
Hitman Jr.
GingerHead
Pac
Inoue
Lomachenko
Sometimes
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
1-3 Crawford/Golovkin/Lomachenko
4-6 Gonzalez/Inoue/Spence
7-9 Kovalev/Thurman/Brook
10-12 Ward/Rigo/Canelo
P.S. I wouldn't be very surprised if Beterbiev or Gvozdyk beat Ward.
4-6 Gonzalez/Inoue/Spence
7-9 Kovalev/Thurman/Brook
10-12 Ward/Rigo/Canelo
P.S. I wouldn't be very surprised if Beterbiev or Gvozdyk beat Ward.
Re: I would now be curious to know what u guys have as your p4p list
noBadhusker wrote:Don't P4P lists normally include guys that are at least the champion at their own weight?Jip wrote:i watched enough live fight of ggg, gonzales, kovalev and ward to know that these 4 aint p4p king. they good boxers, but not the complet package. whether they faught better opponents. i dont care. having better opponents on your resume, doesnt make you automaticly a better boxer than someone with less big names on his record. often times it has been proven that the man with less fights and no names beaten prior to his fight, at the end won the battle. rigondeaux/donaire and usyk/glowacki just to name 2 examples.
P4P
1. Rigondeaux
2. Lomachenko
3. Inoue
4. Gonzales
5. Golovkin
6. Kovalev
7. Crawford
8. Ward
9. Alvarez
10. Usyk