Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Ward didn't win clearly a single round
I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
I think Ward won rounds 11 and 9 convinsingly. Lederman giving Kovalev round 9 is as ridiculous as judges giving round 10 for Ward.crow wrote:I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Honestly, I think Kovalev won 1,2,3,4 and 10.
Ward won 5,7,8 and 9.
Very close rounds : 6, 11 and 12.
Anyway, Kovalev was the better one, and he should have been the winner (more aggresive, more clean punches).
Ward won 5,7,8 and 9.
Very close rounds : 6, 11 and 12.
Anyway, Kovalev was the better one, and he should have been the winner (more aggresive, more clean punches).
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
it was a very close fight IMO, I watched it twice without scoring and felt both times ward had nicked it which puts me in the minority I suppose
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Which is another way of saying if this was a sparring session, you would have preferred to be Ward instead of Kovalev...littlepug wrote:it was a very close fight IMO, I watched it twice without scoring and felt both times ward had nicked it which puts me in the minority I suppose
Twice.
Yeah right.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
You be hurt your opponent, not get hurt, and still lose the round.crow wrote:I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
it wasn't pretty but fighting "ugly" was the only way ward was gonna get the win, and win or no win I wouldn't of wanted to be ward in that fight, it takes a lot of mental strength to come back from a terrible start and still find a way to get the job donecrow wrote:Which is another way of saying if this was a sparring session, you would have preferred to be Ward instead of Kovalev...littlepug wrote:it was a very close fight IMO, I watched it twice without scoring and felt both times ward had nicked it which puts me in the minority I suppose
Twice.
Yeah right.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
. . . and Ward got it done.littlepug wrote:it wasn't pretty but fighting "ugly" was the only way ward was gonna get the win, and win or no win I wouldn't of wanted to be ward in that fight, it takes a lot of mental strength to come back from a terrible start and still find a way to get the job donecrow wrote:Which is another way of saying if this was a sparring session, you would have preferred to be Ward instead of Kovalev...littlepug wrote:it was a very close fight IMO, I watched it twice without scoring and felt both times ward had nicked it which puts me in the minority I suppose
Twice.
Yeah right.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
3,7,9,11 and 12 were clear rounds for Ward,imo, second viewing.crow wrote:I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
so taking the 10-8 round in to account he still lost convincingly .Tanzio wrote:3,7,9,11 and 12 were clear rounds for Ward,imo, second viewing.crow wrote:I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
1, 5 and 8 were also Ward rounds but very close to close, imo, second viewing. That adds up to 115-112 Ward. I gave Krusher 2, 4, 6 and 10 with only 2 being clear. That leaves six rounds (3 each) that I believe were close. If you gave Krusher all 6 of those close rounds then the fight would have been scored 115-112 Krusher.rd350lc wrote:so taking the 10-8 round in to account he still lost convincingly .Tanzio wrote:3,7,9,11 and 12 were clear rounds for Ward,imo, second viewing.crow wrote:I rewatched the fight, and couldn't give Ward a single round convincingly, contrary to Kovalev, who won rds 1,2,and 10 in a decisive manner.
Even the 12 th rd should have been a clear Kovalev rd, because he visibly hurt Ward at least twice, but didn't get the credit as Ward immediately came to clinch and survive.
The faces of both fighters at the end said it all.
My point is simple; this fight was too close to be called a robbery.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
On first viewing I didn't see any clear ward rounds. Sergey clearly won 1,2,310,12.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Why do you even keep posting on these boards?Tanzio wrote:
My point is simple; this fight was too close to be called a robbery.
You're a troll with an agenda and i made sure everyone knows who you are.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
OK , injustice by inept judges any better for you ?Tanzio wrote:1, 5 and 8 were also Ward rounds but very close to close, imo, second viewing. That adds up to 115-112 Ward. I gave Krusher 2, 4, 6 and 10 with only 2 being clear. That leaves six rounds (3 each) that I believe were close. If you gave Krusher all 6 of those close rounds then the fight would have been scored 115-112 Krusher.rd350lc wrote:so taking the 10-8 round in to account he still lost convincingly .Tanzio wrote: 3,7,9,11 and 12 were clear rounds for Ward,imo, second viewing.
My point is simple; this fight was too close to be called a robbery.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23079
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
The things is with clear rounds or close rounds,without a KD ,they all tally up the same
If you have a fight 115-113,the guy with 113 could win 5 clear rounds,maybe even visably hurt his opponent a few times whilst the other guy picks and pokes his way in the rounds he picks up ,still without a knockdown,he losses the fight
If you have a fight 115-113,the guy with 113 could win 5 clear rounds,maybe even visably hurt his opponent a few times whilst the other guy picks and pokes his way in the rounds he picks up ,still without a knockdown,he losses the fight
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Fair enough. We disagree on 1 (which I had for Krusher in realtime), 3 (which I think was one of Ward's clearest rounds), and 12 (which I thought was close in realtime).SaadOffTheDeck wrote:On first viewing I didn't see any clear ward rounds. Sergey clearly won 1,2,310,12.
I know that you probably won't waste the time to actually watch the fight straight and with the commentary muted, but I am very confident that if you did you would see a far closer fight. Maybe you would still score it for Krusher but you would recognize that this was not a robbery.
But, I could be wrong. Maybe you would score it 120-108.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
I'll watch it again, not muted though. Crowd noise helps me concentrate. I'm immune to announcers.
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
When have I ever denied scoring Ramming Speed v Pac for Ramming Speed by a round? Keep congratulating yourself for revealing nothing, if it inflates your ego.crow wrote:Why do you even keep posting on these boards?Tanzio wrote:
My point is simple; this fight was too close to be called a robbery.
You're a troll with an agenda and i made sure everyone knows who you are.
What is my agenda, other than to argue my position, which happens to act like a stick poking the piglets squealing "ROBBERY!", over and over and over again, like breitbart.com enthusiasts spamming youtube trash or PutinHeads claiming the USA is out to get them over and over until Trump got elected. Now all is right with the USA.
It was not a robbery. 3 or 4 years from now I will still be defending my position as I do the Pac v Bradley 1 decision.
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
And no agenda with this breitbart zombieFreedom2013 wrote:https://twitter.com/PaulMaliggnagi/stat ... 2801502208
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Gotta mute the TV, turn off all the lights, cell phones off, kick everyone out of the house, draw the blinds, meditate, then watch, but limit your blinking...... then it pretty obvious, Ward wins.
-
T w_savage
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 04:58
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
That's a fake account by the way.Tanzio wrote:And no agenda with this breitbart zombieFreedom2013 wrote:https://twitter.com/PaulMaliggnagi/stat ... 2801502208
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Impractical Poster wrote:Gotta mute the TV, turn off all the lights, cell phones off, kick everyone out of the house, draw the blinds, meditate, then watch, but limit your blinking...... then it pretty obvious, Ward wins.
Last edited by Tanzio on 21 Nov 2016, 17:50, edited 1 time in total.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Ward didn't win clearly a single round
Honestly, I'd have to watch again. However, I doubt my view will change much. Most people won't admit it, but I will... when going into a fight of this magnitude, it is hard to go into it unbiased. Most are either pulling for one guy or the other. When it's a close fight, the judging becomes subjective and geared towards what your fighter does right.Tanzio wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:Gotta mute the TV, turn off all the lights, cell phones off, kick everyone out of the house, draw the blinds, meditate, then watch, but limit your blinking...... then it pretty obvious, Ward wins.touché. Fact is that I was distracted a bit by vodka shooting Russians and our loud spouses and girlfriends.
You're going to be hard pressed to find a guy who was rooting for Kovalev score that fight for Ward. And on the other side of the coin, you are going to be hard pressed to find a guy who was rooting for Ward that scored it for Kovalev. It's human nature. I was rooting for Kovalev, and so I am taking his effective punching, aggressiveness, and power into more account than Ward's ring generalship and counter punching. Just the nature of the beast.
Most people enjoy Kovalev a lot more than Ward which is why the polls show a higher percentage thinking Kov won the fight.