Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings CLOSED
BWH Rankings as of 19 November 2016:
Champion in Recess: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Joseph Parker
7. Anthony Joshua
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Carlos Takam
10. Vyacheslav Glazkov
11. Lucas Browne
12. Bermane Stiverne
13. Artur Szpilka
14. Dereck Chisora
15. VACANT
Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
The candidates are:
Christian Hammer
Andy Ruiz Jr
David Haye
Jun Long Zhang
Johann Duhaupas
To make a vote that will be counted, you must order the above fighters from 1-5, with 1 being the highest and 5 the lowest.
My vote:
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Haye
5. Zhang
Note: The votes will be tallied using a preferential vote counting system. If no fighter has 50% +1 of the #1 votes, the fighter with the lowest number of #1 votes will be eliminated, and their #2 vote becomes a #1. This process is repeated until one fighter has the majority.
Champion in Recess: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Joseph Parker
7. Anthony Joshua
8. Bryant Jennings
9. Carlos Takam
10. Vyacheslav Glazkov
11. Lucas Browne
12. Bermane Stiverne
13. Artur Szpilka
14. Dereck Chisora
15. VACANT
Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
The candidates are:
Christian Hammer
Andy Ruiz Jr
David Haye
Jun Long Zhang
Johann Duhaupas
To make a vote that will be counted, you must order the above fighters from 1-5, with 1 being the highest and 5 the lowest.
My vote:
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Haye
5. Zhang
Note: The votes will be tallied using a preferential vote counting system. If no fighter has 50% +1 of the #1 votes, the fighter with the lowest number of #1 votes will be eliminated, and their #2 vote becomes a #1. This process is repeated until one fighter has the majority.
Last edited by jezzamundo on 02 Dec 2016, 21:06, edited 1 time in total.
-
HyacinthusTurnipseed
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1. Haye
2. Ruiz Jr
3. Duhapas
4. Hammer
5. Jun Long Zhang
2. Ruiz Jr
3. Duhapas
4. Hammer
5. Jun Long Zhang
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1. Duhaupas
2. Ruiz
3. Hammer
4. Zhang
5. Haye
2. Ruiz
3. Hammer
4. Zhang
5. Haye
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Ruiz
Haye
Duhaupus
Hammer
.
.
.
.
.
.
And so far behind these 4 is Zhang
Haye
Duhaupus
Hammer
.
.
.
.
.
.
And so far behind these 4 is Zhang
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Haye
4. Ruiz Jr
5. Zhang
2. Duhaupas
3. Haye
4. Ruiz Jr
5. Zhang
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I agree with yours.
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Haye
5. Zhang
Hammer earned it by beating Tepe who IIRC we only dropped for PED use.
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Haye
5. Zhang
Hammer earned it by beating Tepe who IIRC we only dropped for PED use.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1. Johann Duhaupas
2. Christian Hammer
3. David Haye
4. Andy Ruiz Jr
5. Jun Long Zhang
2. Christian Hammer
3. David Haye
4. Andy Ruiz Jr
5. Jun Long Zhang
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Haye
Ruiz
Duhaupas
Hammer
Zhang
Ruiz
Duhaupas
Hammer
Zhang
-
the_doctor
- Welterweight
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Haye
Ruiz Jnr
Duhaupas
Hammer
Zhang
Ruiz Jnr
Duhaupas
Hammer
Zhang
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I need to think about this. When is a deadline for voting?jezzamundo wrote: Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Get your vote in before the weekend and it will be counted.Tarkus wrote:I need to think about this. When is a deadline for voting?jezzamundo wrote: Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
I thought so. Thanks mate.jezzamundo wrote:Get your vote in before the weekend and it will be counted.Tarkus wrote:I need to think about this. When is a deadline for voting?jezzamundo wrote: Topic A - Who should fill the vacant #15 ranking?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Zhang
Ruiz Jnr
Duhaupas
Haye
Hammer
Ruiz Jnr
Duhaupas
Haye
Hammer
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Bump, more votes please!
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1- Duhappas
2- Hammer
3- Haye
To even mention the other two is embarrasing
2- Hammer
3- Haye
To even mention the other two is embarrasing
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
1. Hammer
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Zhang
5. Haye
2. Duhaupas
3. Ruiz Jr
4. Zhang
5. Haye
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
jezzamundo wrote:Bump, more votes please!
I assume incomplete votes wont be accepted?Lennox wrote:1- Duhappas
2- Hammer
3- Haye
To even mention the other two is embarrasing
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
In an ideal world, yes, but given the relatively small number of votes, I'll take this one. Ruiz and Zhang are running last anyway, so it's unlikely I'll need to go past the third preference.Tarkus wrote:jezzamundo wrote:Bump, more votes please!I assume incomplete votes wont be accepted?Lennox wrote:1- Duhappas
2- Hammer
3- Haye
To even mention the other two is embarrasing
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Actually Ruiz has a good chance of winning as he has lot of 2nds and they will start becoming 1st.jezzamundo wrote:In an ideal world, yes, but given the relatively small number of votes, I'll take this one. Ruiz and Zhang are running last anyway, so it's unlikely I'll need to go past the third preference.Tarkus wrote:jezzamundo wrote:Bump, more votes please!I assume incomplete votes wont be accepted?Lennox wrote:1- Duhappas
2- Hammer
3- Haye
To even mention the other two is embarrasing
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
The votes here actually show perfectly how much lack of knowledge people got about the heavyweight division. Daffy, who's scared of Briggs, get ranked above better opponents by many, while Hughie Fury isn't even considered, while he's clearly better as Daffy.
Ah well, funny topic in a few years.
Ah well, funny topic in a few years.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Good point, I hadn't noticed that. Actually, I'm considering changing the vote counting method, as I think doing it in the way I have prescribed isn't the best when dealing with a relatively small number of votes. Perhaps I'll count who is preferred head-to-head.Tarkus wrote:Actually Ruiz has a good chance of winning as he has lot of 2nds and they will start becoming 1st.jezzamundo wrote:In an ideal world, yes, but given the relatively small number of votes, I'll take this one. Ruiz and Zhang are running last anyway, so it's unlikely I'll need to go past the third preference.Tarkus wrote:
I assume incomplete votes wont be accepted?
At this point:
Hammer 4-8 Duhaupas
Hammer 6-6 Ruiz Jr
Hammer 7-5 Haye
Hammer 11-1 Zhang
Duhaupas 7-5 Ruiz Jr
Duhaupas 8-4 Haye
Duhaupas 11-1 Zhang
Ruiz Jr 5-7 Haye
Ruiz Jr 10-1 Zhang
Haye 9-3 Zhang
Based on preferential voting, where a fighter needs 7 of the 12 votes to win:
Round 1:
Hammer - 4
Haye - 3
Duhaupas - 3
Ruiz - 1
Zhang - 1 (eliminated based on preferences)
Round 2:
Hammer - 4
Haye - 3
Duhaupas - 3
Ruiz - 2 (eliminated)
Round 3:
Hammer - 4
Haye - 4
Duhaupas - 4
So there's a 3-way tie and nowhere to go. Like I said, this is a good way of counting votes, better than first past the post, but it doesn't work so well with small numbers.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
It's not a lack of knowledge - it's a different opinion to your own.asdfjkl wrote:The votes here actually show perfectly how much lack of knowledge people got about the heavyweight division. Daffy, who's scared of Briggs, get ranked above better opponents by many, while Hughie Fury isn't even considered, while he's clearly better as Daffy.
Ah well, funny topic in a few years.
I think it's very unlikely Haye is scared of Briggs. Briggs is just an unattractive opponent for Haye, because while Haye should be able to beat him, Briggs would always have a puncher's chance and has a pretty good chin too, so Haye may not be able to bomb him out early like he did his recent opponents. Briggs is fairly lowly regarded and losing to him would ruin Haye's reputation and money earning capability. The risk-reward ratio just isn't there. It's not fear, it's just a business decision.
That Hughie Fury is clearly better than Haye is, again, nothing more than your own opinion. Perhaps he's better, perhaps he's not, but there's nothing clear about it.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
How about just stick to the voting.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
That's fear and it's common sense that Hughie is betterjezzamundo wrote:It's not a lack of knowledge - it's a different opinion to your own.asdfjkl wrote:The votes here actually show perfectly how much lack of knowledge people got about the heavyweight division. Daffy, who's scared of Briggs, get ranked above better opponents by many, while Hughie Fury isn't even considered, while he's clearly better as Daffy.
Ah well, funny topic in a few years.
I think it's very unlikely Haye is scared of Briggs. Briggs is just an unattractive opponent for Haye, because while Haye should be able to beat him, Briggs would always have a puncher's chance and has a pretty good chin too, so Haye may not be able to bomb him out early like he did his recent opponents. Briggs is fairly lowly regarded and losing to him would ruin Haye's reputation and money earning capability. The risk-reward ratio just isn't there. It's not fear, it's just a business decision.
That Hughie Fury is clearly better than Haye is, again, nothing more than your own opinion. Perhaps he's better, perhaps he's not, but there's nothing clear about it.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
You are totally deluded. Educate yourself.asdfjkl wrote:The votes here actually show perfectly how much lack of knowledge people got about the heavyweight division. Daffy, who's scared of Briggs, get ranked above better opponents by many, while Hughie Fury isn't even considered, while he's clearly better as Daffy.
Ah well, funny topic in a few years.
www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200