Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
http://www.BS.com/lebedev-gass ... ke--111265
I am wondering if it just about saving money or they are not sure about the outcome.
I am wondering if it just about saving money or they are not sure about the outcome.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.gilgamesh wrote:Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Hope he gets knocked out. F*ck him. I respected Lebedev up to now.lefty wrote:Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.gilgamesh wrote:Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
It doesn't sound like Lebedev. Maybe something bad happened in the camp.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Maybe promoter isn't prepared to cough-up WBA sanction fee, therefore applied for special permit, which is allowed.. providing defence is not overdue. However if he does his balls......WBA title will be history.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
I don't blame any champion for trying to save money on those crooked sanctioning feesAntonS wrote:Maybe promoter isn't prepared to cough-up WBA sanction fee, therefore applied for special permit, which is allowed.. providing defence is not overdue. However if he does his balls......WBA title will be history.
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
lefty wrote:Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.gilgamesh wrote:Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
So he can get knocked out in 30 second's and keep being called cruiserweight champion of the world with his WBA belt
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
AntonS wrote:Maybe promoter isn't prepared to cough-up WBA sanction fee, therefore applied for special permit, which is allowed.. providing defence is not overdue. However if he does his balls......WBA title will be history.
So he will loss the WBA strap even though its not on the line so if its not on the line why does he loss it its confusing to say the least
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Title is always on the line, whether sanctioned defence or not.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:AntonS wrote:Maybe promoter isn't prepared to cough-up WBA sanction fee, therefore applied for special permit, which is allowed.. providing defence is not overdue. However if he does his balls......WBA title will be history.
So he will loss the WBA strap even though its not on the line so if its not on the line why does he loss it its confusing to say the least![]()
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
lefty wrote:Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.gilgamesh wrote:Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
Technically its always on the line............ AntonS just updated me so he [Lebedev] should milk it for all he can and just defend the WBA belt also
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
That would be OK if WBA etc had set sanction fee. They take a decent slice out of overall purse.......the bigger the purse, the bigger sanction fee
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23078
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Its a pity every boxer,promoter,journalist and fan didn't just boycott the WBA like they never existed,their pure scum
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
On top of that, there's their respective junket boys (ref & judges), their airfare, accommodation, meals etc etc and naturally all unimportant purseAntonS wrote:That would be OK if WBA etc had set sanction fee. They take a decent slice out of overall purse.......the bigger the purse, the bigger sanction fee
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Spark him Murat.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
IMO, If Murat did so, on legal side of things, he could claim WBA title if he's prepared to cough-up its sanction fee. However, given the system in place......What would be the sanction fee?Killer Blow wrote:Spark him Murat.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 101623
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
What if Gassiev pays the sanctioning fee? Will it be on the line for him?
It's like WBA never sanctioned the GGG-Brook fight, but had GGG lost, the title would have been vacant..
Or when Pulev was mandatory for Wlad'/ IBF.. he only paid sanctioning fees for the IBF so only the IBF was on the line for him. However, had Wlad lost im not sure if he would have been stripped of his other titles.
It's like WBA never sanctioned the GGG-Brook fight, but had GGG lost, the title would have been vacant..
Or when Pulev was mandatory for Wlad'/ IBF.. he only paid sanctioning fees for the IBF so only the IBF was on the line for him. However, had Wlad lost im not sure if he would have been stripped of his other titles.
-
Boxing Writer
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Wlad would be stripped because all the titles were on the line for him, only IBF title was for Pulev.Ruthless-RKO wrote:What if Gassiev pays the sanctioning fee? Will it be on the line for him?
It's like WBA never sanctioned the GGG-Brook fight, but had GGG lost, the title would have been vacant..
Or when Pulev was mandatory for Wlad'/ IBF.. he only paid sanctioning fees for the IBF so only the IBF was on the line for him. However, had Wlad lost im not sure if he would have been stripped of his other titles.
As for Lebedev - Gassiev situation, it doesn't look good at all. Especially for Lebedev. If his team has so little confidence in him, it might affect his performance too. Strange for me, because while I think Gassiev has serious size advantage and (probably) hits slightly harder, Lebedev, in my opinion, is clearly more skilled. Not to mention he has way more experience.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Yep, and Gassiev will come more confident seeing the uncertainty in the other camp.Boxing Writer wrote:Wlad would be stripped because all the titles were on the line for him, only IBF title was for Pulev.Ruthless-RKO wrote:What if Gassiev pays the sanctioning fee? Will it be on the line for him?
It's like WBA never sanctioned the GGG-Brook fight, but had GGG lost, the title would have been vacant..
Or when Pulev was mandatory for Wlad'/ IBF.. he only paid sanctioning fees for the IBF so only the IBF was on the line for him. However, had Wlad lost im not sure if he would have been stripped of his other titles.
As for Lebedev - Gassiev situation, it doesn't look good at all. Especially for Lebedev. If his team has so little confidence in him, it might affect his performance too. Strange for me, because while I think Gassiev has serious size advantage and (probably) hits slightly harder, Lebedev, in my opinion, is clearly more skilled. Not to mention he has way more experience.
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
I think that it is a fine idea for all boxers to ignore the alphabet sanctioning fees. I'm sure that I am being naive here, since I could not care less about the alphabets' structures. But really, who cares about all this belt nonsense? Whoever wins gets the W over their opponent and their share of the purse.
It might be an avenue back to one legit champion. Afterall, why should 3G be chasing the MW belts? It makes absolutely no sense. 3G is the undisputed king of the MW division. All others are pretenders. Everyone knows it including the skirts with the other belts.
GingerHead with his (paraphrasing), "I'm Mexican and we don't fvck around" nonsense just prior to "you mean this belt Mr. 3G? Here, take it. It doesn't go with my ginger curl."
It might be an avenue back to one legit champion. Afterall, why should 3G be chasing the MW belts? It makes absolutely no sense. 3G is the undisputed king of the MW division. All others are pretenders. Everyone knows it including the skirts with the other belts.
GingerHead with his (paraphrasing), "I'm Mexican and we don't fvck around" nonsense just prior to "you mean this belt Mr. 3G? Here, take it. It doesn't go with my ginger curl."
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
Yes. He can hold an alphabet title. If Ricky Burns can still be a "world champion" then I don't see why Lebedev can't hold a meaningless alphabet trinket.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:lefty wrote:Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.gilgamesh wrote:Why would Lebedev even be able to make that decision? He should be automatically stripped of it if he doesn't intend to defend it.
So he can get knocked out in 30 second's and keep being called cruiserweight champion of the world with his WBA belt
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Lebedev doesn't want WBA belt to be at stake
It is WBA belt we are talking about. Even C level fighter like Shumenov has one.lefty wrote:Yes. He can hold an alphabet title. If Ricky Burns can still be a "world champion" then I don't see why Lebedev can't hold a meaningless alphabet trinket.ClivePatrickLyons wrote:lefty wrote: Because Gassiev is only the mandatory to Lebedev's IBF belt. Lebedev doesn't even have to put the WBA belt on the line technically.
So he can get knocked out in 30 second's and keep being called cruiserweight champion of the world with his WBA belt
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11