How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post Reply

Has Haye conned the British public?

Poll ended at 06 Dec 2016, 13:32

Yes
16
42%
No
22
58%
 
Total votes: 38

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103453
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I see this everywhere now.. Mostly after Bellew screamed it at Haye after his last fight. Has he really conned us?

Did anyone expect those two fights to be competitive?

The fights weren't on PPV, so we didn't have to dish out £20 for it..

It was on Dave, a free channel, where he garnered over 3 million views.

O2 Arena was probably packed with his hardcore and casual boxing fans who probably enjoy watching him and missed him fighting..

Has he really conned the British public? Can someone explain? or tell me if I have missed anything?

I know he donated a % of his last gate to Nick Blackwell, was that a con too?
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by boxingknockout »

Well I agree. He hasn't so much conned the (casual) fan as been bloody clever. Beating up 2 no hopers whose records suggested they were dangerous.... I think he's great at marketing himself.

Whereas Hearn is just a blatant liar....
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Killer Blow »

Two words: Audley Harrison
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Haye.... in alot of ways..... consciously and unconsciously has conned the public on a number of occasions.

One can argue he "won" the heavyweight crown in a gift decision. Many have said that Holyfield "beat" Valuev more decisively than Haye did. His defenses of that title are questionable: John Ruiz (who was inactive), Audley Harrison (who had no business being in there), and of course him claiming a broken toe against Wladimir Klitschko. Then there was "retirement" talk. Then he said he'd fight Fury, backed out due to injury, resigned to fight Fury, backed out again due to "injury". "Retires". Comes back to fight a few bums (De Mori, etc) and even talks about fighting Shannon Briggs of all people. Now, here he is, in quite possibly his toughest test since Klitschko against Bellew.

Everyone is saying Tony has no shot, but if one thinks about it long and hard, Haye hasn't faced a truly credible fighter in quite a long time. Not since Klitschko (2011). And he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.

Oh well. I think this will be a great fight. I can't wait to see it. This is one of those "throwback" fights to a bygone era when crossover (weight class) matches were frequent. Champions against champions. Bellew may not be as fast, or as skilled, but he has more heart and more determination and toughness than given credit for. Besides, this is the fight Bellew wants. He was the one who pursued it, after all. And when men want something bad enough, they defy expectations. I wouldn't count him out.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Rexob »

He is a business man, what does everyone really expect ?it's always been the same, it is after all professional boxing?
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by SteveO »

HomicideHenry wrote:he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.
Haye is not coming back down to cruiserweight.
The Haye-Bellew contest is at heavyweight. Bellew's WBC cruiserweight title is not at stake.
Bellew is the one changing weight categories not Haye.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by HomicideHenry »

SteveO wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.
Haye is not coming back down to cruiserweight.
The Haye-Bellew contest is at heavyweight. Bellew's WBC cruiserweight title is not at stake.
Bellew is the one changing weight categories not Haye.
Ah, I misunderstood, then.

I was under the impression that it would be a catchweight sort of contest, or cruiserweight.

Well, if that is the case..... Believe Cruiserweight limit is 210 (these days) so if he comes in at 211.... he'll maintain most of his speed and abilities, not giving up much. Hate to hear that actually. All the favoritism is in Haye's favor, then. Oh well. I'll still be rooting for Bellew. Hopefully he doesn't fall into the "Rocky Curse" (remember Tarver after Rocky Balboa?) .....
nitro5912
Middleweight
Posts: 733
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:02

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by nitro5912 »

HomicideHenry wrote:
SteveO wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.
Haye is not coming back down to cruiserweight.
The Haye-Bellew contest is at heavyweight. Bellew's WBC cruiserweight title is not at stake.
Bellew is the one changing weight categories not Haye.
Ah, I misunderstood, then.

I was under the impression that it would be a catchweight sort of contest, or cruiserweight.

Well, if that is the case..... Believe Cruiserweight limit is 210 (these days) so if he comes in at 211.... he'll maintain most of his speed and abilities, not giving up much. Hate to hear that actually. All the favoritism is in Haye's favor, then. Oh well. I'll still be rooting for Bellew. Hopefully he doesn't fall into the "Rocky Curse" (remember Tarver after Rocky Balboa?) .....
Nope, cruiserweight is 200lbs. Boomer weighs in around 199lbs. Hate weighed in around 224lbs for Arnold and 227lbs for de mori.

He will probably come in around the 220lbs mark. I can't see boomer coming in at more than 210lbs
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Finn »

Killer Blow wrote:Two words: Audley Harrison
Is that a con? Haye said all along he would knock him out in 3.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Killer Blow »

Finn wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:Two words: Audley Harrison
Is that a con? Haye said all along he would knock him out in 3.
Watch the fight again. It was a con.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by ALI »

I like Haye, but i dont like what he is doing since his return. For a 2 weight world champion, Mark De Mori was an absolute joke, should never have been allowed. The next fellow also, then he's trying to make a fight with old man briggs but opted for an average cruiserweight instead. I can only come to the conclusion he is after the paydays, so its hard to argue he is not trying to con people.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4492
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by dookus »

Killer Blow wrote:
Finn wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:Two words: Audley Harrison
Is that a con? Haye said all along he would knock him out in 3.
Watch the fight again. It was a con.
I don't think it was a con on Audley's part - he really did look that terrified
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by BitPlayer »

dookus wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Finn wrote: Is that a con? Haye said all along he would knock him out in 3.
Watch the fight again. It was a con.
I don't think it was a con on Audley's part - he really did look that terrified
But pretending he was taking a challenge was.

He recently claimed it had that fight due to public demand. :brick:
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Killer Blow »

dookus wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Finn wrote: Is that a con? Haye said all along he would knock him out in 3.
Watch the fight again. It was a con.
I don't think it was a con on Audley's part - he really did look that terrified
After saying all of this: https://youtu.be/MTpO5DF4JFM

Shameful
Muttley
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 24 Aug 2009, 14:27

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Muttley »

HomicideHenry wrote:Haye.... in alot of ways..... consciously and unconsciously has conned the public on a number of occasions.

One can argue he "won" the heavyweight crown in a gift decision. Many have said that Holyfield "beat" Valuev more decisively than Haye did. His defenses of that title are questionable: John Ruiz (who was inactive), Audley Harrison (who had no business being in there), and of course him claiming a broken toe against Wladimir Klitschko. Then there was "retirement" talk. Then he said he'd fight Fury, backed out due to injury, resigned to fight Fury, backed out again due to "injury". "Retires". Comes back to fight a few bums (De Mori, etc) and even talks about fighting Shannon Briggs of all people. Now, here he is, in quite possibly his toughest test since Klitschko against Bellew.

Everyone is saying Tony has no shot, but if one thinks about it long and hard, Haye hasn't faced a truly credible fighter in quite a long time. Not since Klitschko (2011). And he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.

Oh well. I think this will be a great fight. I can't wait to see it. This is one of those "throwback" fights to a bygone era when crossover (weight class) matches were frequent. Champions against champions. Bellew may not be as fast, or as skilled, but he has more heart and more determination and toughness than given credit for. Besides, this is the fight Bellew wants. He was the one who pursued it, after all. And when men want something bad enough, they defy expectations. I wouldn't count him out.
You don't work for Sky do you? Haye was right when he said he can finish the fight whenever he likes. He punches far too hard for Bellew, whose defence has more holes in than a tea strainer
Muttley
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 24 Aug 2009, 14:27

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Muttley »

ALI wrote:I like Haye, but i dont like what he is doing since his return. For a 2 weight world champion, Mark De Mori was an absolute joke, should never have been allowed. The next fellow also, then he's trying to make a fight with old man briggs but opted for an average cruiserweight instead. I can only come to the conclusion he is after the paydays, so its hard to argue he is not trying to con people.
Spot on sir. Real boxing fans will not even bother wasting their time with this but this event will still make a small fortune on ppv. When I first started working in boxing in the early ninties a very wise trainer,manager,promoter said to me once 'son, this game is full of actors' and he was absolutely right. I truly love the sport of boxing, the real grassroots stuff but what I saw yesterday at the press conference saddened me. And even worse, so called boxing experts trying to sell this a real 50/50 fight.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by TheGman »

The only person out of these two who has conned the british public is bellend,he portrays himself as a decent human being just wanting to get home safe after every fight but wants to act like a wild animal at every press coference or weigh in plus the "i would rather die in the ring than quit" remark before the stevenson fight,bellew is a con artist,who did he fight at cw to deserve the title shot?? No one thats the answer. Haye has done more for british boxing in one month than bellend has done in his whole career
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Has Haye conned the general public...yes. has he conned the boxing fans...no. hopefully most boxing fans cashed in on the 'dave' fights.

Have boxing promoters in general conned the British public...yes. We have very few world class boxers but they sell domestic level boxers as elite
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Muttley wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:Haye.... in alot of ways..... consciously and unconsciously has conned the public on a number of occasions.

One can argue he "won" the heavyweight crown in a gift decision. Many have said that Holyfield "beat" Valuev more decisively than Haye did. His defenses of that title are questionable: John Ruiz (who was inactive), Audley Harrison (who had no business being in there), and of course him claiming a broken toe against Wladimir Klitschko. Then there was "retirement" talk. Then he said he'd fight Fury, backed out due to injury, resigned to fight Fury, backed out again due to "injury". "Retires". Comes back to fight a few bums (De Mori, etc) and even talks about fighting Shannon Briggs of all people. Now, here he is, in quite possibly his toughest test since Klitschko against Bellew.

Everyone is saying Tony has no shot, but if one thinks about it long and hard, Haye hasn't faced a truly credible fighter in quite a long time. Not since Klitschko (2011). And he hasn't fought Cruiserweight since 2008, when he faces Bellew it'll be 9 years since. I keep thinking of Roy Jones and others who bounced up in weight, only to come down and never exactly recovered the capabilities. Even if Haye defeats Bellew, recaptures the crown, the real money is at heavyweight and he knows it. He'll return to heavyweight, and I don't believe he'll be "the same". He'll be older, slower, more wear and tear.

Oh well. I think this will be a great fight. I can't wait to see it. This is one of those "throwback" fights to a bygone era when crossover (weight class) matches were frequent. Champions against champions. Bellew may not be as fast, or as skilled, but he has more heart and more determination and toughness than given credit for. Besides, this is the fight Bellew wants. He was the one who pursued it, after all. And when men want something bad enough, they defy expectations. I wouldn't count him out.
You don't work for Sky do you? Haye was right when he said he can finish the fight whenever he likes. He punches far too hard for Bellew, whose defence has more holes in than a tea strainer
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by asdfjkl »

Daffy doesn't do anything else lol.

Only absolute idiots can become fans of this guy.
Like a Boss
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5863
Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21

Re: How has David Haye conned he British public?

Post by Like a Boss »

Ruthless-RKO wrote:I see this everywhere now.. Mostly after Bellew screamed it at Haye after his last fight. Has he really conned us?

Did anyone expect those two fights to be competitive?

The fights weren't on PPV, so we didn't have to dish out £20 for it..

It was on Dave, a free channel, where he garnered over 3 million views.

O2 Arena was probably packed with his hardcore and casual boxing fans who probably enjoy watching him and missed him fighting..

Has he really conned the British public? Can someone explain? or tell me if I have missed anything?

I know he donated a % of his last gate to Nick Blackwell, was that a con too?
:TU:
Post Reply