Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by Jip »

gilgamesh wrote:
Jip wrote:pacquiao - tszyu 140
valero - duran 140
provodnikov - chavez 140
Duran vs Valero would've been a one sided slaughter. Duran would've eaten Valero alive and made him look like nothing. I don't understand why anybody rates Valero highly.

He would've been exposed soon enough if he hadn't offed himself. Talks were going on between him and Juan Manuel Marquez. Marquez would've owned him.

a one sided slaughter can be very entertaining and action packed, just watch tua-ruiz :OhYes:

also lets not forget that in terms of punching power p4p valero might be the biggest puncher ever. also he improved and became better not just relying on power and koing dudes in 1 rd. duran wouldnt have had an easy night, so marquez.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by Jip »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Chavez would slaughter provodnikov too.

true, but it would have freaking entertaining, cause provod can take it, but never stops rushing forward for more war, so nobody cant deny the fact it would have been a crazy blood fest.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by Syntax Error »

Duran v Pryor - Light Welter (Duran could have fought at that weight if he wanted to).

Benn v Froch - Super Middle.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Jip wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Jip wrote:pacquiao - tszyu 140
valero - duran 140
provodnikov - chavez 140
Duran vs Valero would've been a one sided slaughter. Duran would've eaten Valero alive and made him look like nothing. I don't understand why anybody rates Valero highly.

He would've been exposed soon enough if he hadn't offed himself. Talks were going on between him and Juan Manuel Marquez. Marquez would've owned him.

a one sided slaughter can be very entertaining and action packed, just watch tua-ruiz :OhYes:

also lets not forget that in terms of punching power p4p valero might be the biggest puncher ever. also he improved and became better not just relying on power and koing dudes in 1 rd. duran wouldnt have had an easy night, so marquez.
:lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Jip wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Chavez would slaughter provodnikov too.

true, but it would have freaking entertaining, cause provod can take it, but never stops rushing forward for more war, so nobody cant deny the fact it would have been a crazy blood fest.
It would have been a mismatch. At least Duran would ko Valero in 1 or 2 rounds. No argument that Provo would gush blood.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by Jip »

Syntax Error wrote:Duran v Pryor - Light Welter (Duran could have fought at that weight if he wanted to).

Benn v Froch - Super Middle.

that would ve been brutal....2 agressors
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46515
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by gilgamesh »

Jip wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Jip wrote:pacquiao - tszyu 140
valero - duran 140
provodnikov - chavez 140
Duran vs Valero would've been a one sided slaughter. Duran would've eaten Valero alive and made him look like nothing. I don't understand why anybody rates Valero highly.

He would've been exposed soon enough if he hadn't offed himself. Talks were going on between him and Juan Manuel Marquez. Marquez would've owned him.

a one sided slaughter can be very entertaining and action packed, just watch tua-ruiz :OhYes:

also lets not forget that in terms of punching power p4p valero might be the biggest puncher ever. also he improved and became better not just relying on power and koing dudes in 1 rd. duran wouldnt have had an easy night, so marquez.
Valero never knocked out a particularly great opponent. The fact that he won all of his fights by KO against sub-par opposition will cause him to be overrated for quite a long time to come I guess.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46515
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Chavez would slaughter provodnikov too.
Yeah he would
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Which 2 fighters in which division would be the perfect match for pure action?

Post by IKSRTFO »

Jip wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Jip wrote:pacquiao - tszyu 140
valero - duran 140
provodnikov - chavez 140
Duran vs Valero would've been a one sided slaughter. Duran would've eaten Valero alive and made him look like nothing. I don't understand why anybody rates Valero highly.

He would've been exposed soon enough if he hadn't offed himself. Talks were going on between him and Juan Manuel Marquez. Marquez would've owned him.

a one sided slaughter can be very entertaining and action packed, just watch tua-ruiz :OhYes:

also lets not forget that in terms of punching power p4p valero might be the biggest puncher ever. also he improved and became better not just relying on power and koing dudes in 1 rd. duran wouldnt have had an easy night, so marquez.
:TU:
Pacquiao Margarito and even Mayweather Gatti were fun fights to watch
Post Reply