Did you pay £17 for that
Did you pay £17 for that
You fackin' mugs
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Brilliant thread. 
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
I sure did...was a really enjoyable card.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
No, I only paid £16.95.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
No way, embarrassing 'main event' and I won't buy a PPV on the off-chance that a couple of the undercard fights turn out well.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13437
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
Keith putting it into perspective quite nicely there.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
The millions of pounds dropping into Hearn and AJ's bank account in what basically amounts to fraudkeithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
I didn't, I'm guessing around 500k people did however...
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
If you don't like it, don't watch it. You're acting like there's never been a mismatch in boxing.davie wrote:The millions of pounds dropping into Hearn and AJ's bank account in what basically amounts to fraudkeithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Exactly. I watched it on HD on a big screen. And it's £17.jameswilson wrote:keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?![]()
Keith putting it into perspective quite nicely there.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
No big deal, just disappointing that boxing is the only sport which has regular UK PPV. Especially for cards like tonight where they blatantly don't need to be.keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
It did need to be. That's the business model and has been for more twenty years. It's not going away, so get used to it.Boxerbeetle wrote:No big deal, just disappointing that boxing is the only sport which has regular UK PPV. Especially for cards like tonight where they blatantly don't need to be.keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Sure, but if you want to watch It live you just buy it. It's not like the US where PPVs are around $50-60Boxerbeetle wrote:No big deal, just disappointing that boxing is the only sport which has regular UK PPV. Especially for cards like tonight where they blatantly don't need to be.keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Thought it was a fairly decent card in the end. Whyte-Chisora went a long way to make it decent though, one of the best HW fights for a while.Boxerbeetle wrote:No big deal, just disappointing that boxing is the only sport which has regular UK PPV. Especially for cards like tonight where they blatantly don't need to be.keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
keithmoonhangover wrote:If you don't like it, don't watch it. You're acting like there's never been a mismatch in boxing.davie wrote:The millions of pounds dropping into Hearn and AJ's bank account in what basically amounts to fraudkeithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
Ah, the old "it's happened lots of times before, so it must be ok" defence
Next we'll get the "it's ppv worthy as long as people keep buying it" argument
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
I didn't but you pay for the card, Davie. It wasn't a bad bill at all.davie wrote:You fackin' mugs
But I don't want to stop you feeling smug or anything
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Nope, watched the fights on Youtube about 30 minutes after they finished. Almost as good as live and in HD. You need to find and subscribe to the handful of Youtubers who capture the fights and put them up minutes after the final bell. They're free, in great picture quality and reliable. I knew the card is shite so wouldn't buy the PPV. This way I can watch the card, a bit behind live broadcast, and have a raging hard on about saving £16.95. A right smug tit right now 
Last edited by chad on 10 Dec 2016, 20:58, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
No chance of that mate.Taansend wrote:I didn't but you pay for the card, Davie. It wasn't a bad bill at all.davie wrote:You fackin' mugs
But I don't want to stop you feeling smug or anything
I just can't come to terms with paying ppv for a show where the main event is a keep busy fight,
they could have Ward vs Gatti, Barrera vs Morales, Hagler vs Hearns and the fornicating rumble in the jungle on the undercard
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Well said, mate.keithmoonhangover wrote:Great card and the main event was as expected. It's 17 quid, not 17 grand. What's the big deal?
Price of a curry or 3 beers. Some great fights on there.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
Don't know how I've managed to quote myselfchad wrote:Nope, watched the fights on Youtube about 30 minutes after they finished. Almost as good as live and in HD. You need to find and subscribe to the handful of Youtubers who capture the fights and put them up minutes after the final bell. They're free, in great picture quality and reliable. I knew the card was shite so wouldn't buy the PPV. This way I can watch the card, a bit behind live broadcast, and have a raging hard on about saving £16.95. A right smug tit right now
Last edited by chad on 10 Dec 2016, 21:01, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
And again. I'm so pissed and smug I've lost control!chad wrote:Nope, watched the fights on Youtube about 30 minutes after they finished. Almost as good as live and in HD. You need to find and subscribe to the handful of Youtubers who capture the fights and put them up minutes after the final bell. They're free, in great picture quality and reliable. I knew the card was shite so didn't buy the PPV. This way I can watch the card, a bit behind live broadcast, and have a raging hard on about saving £16.95. A right smug tit right now
Last edited by chad on 10 Dec 2016, 21:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
That's fair enough but there's plenty that pay for the bill.davie wrote:No chance of that mate.Taansend wrote:I didn't but you pay for the card, Davie. It wasn't a bad bill at all.davie wrote:You fackin' mugs
But I don't want to stop you feeling smug or anything
I just can't come to terms with paying ppv for a show where the main event is a keep busy fight,
they could have Ward vs Gatti, Barrera vs Morales, Hagler vs Hearns and the effing rumble in the jungle on the undercard
Starting a thread after a great night of boxing makes you look more of a mug than them, to be honest.
And I ain't saying that to get a cheap dig. It's not a huge amount of money. You calling them "fecking mugs" for paying a small amount of money for a decent evenings entertainment doesn't make you look like a superstar.
Re: Did you pay £17 for that
I do it all the timechad wrote:Don't know why I've managed to quote myselfchad wrote:Nope, watched the fights on Youtube about 30 minutes after they finished. Almost as good as live and in HD. You need to find and subscribe to the handful of Youtubers who capture the fights and put them up minutes after the final bell. They're free, in great picture quality and reliable. I knew the card was shite so wouldn't buy the PPV. This way I can watch the card, a bit behind live broadcast, and have a raging hard on about saving £16.95. A right smug tit right now
You hit the QUOTE icon instead of the EDIT icon.