Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post Reply
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Jip »

I mean pac beat convincingly Margarito & Clottey, one tall and one very physicly strong guy.

media always wanted floyd vs canelo or floyd vs whoever, cause ppv stardom equals entertainmant.....not!

but why werent there never serious talks of pacquiao against canelo, would do much more sense, both action packed, both world class. to be honest even now old pac would pose a lot of problems against flat footed al. yes, canelo can punch. but did he ever touched lara, who can move. would he catch pac, who has speedy gonzales kind of footspeed, even now :OhYes:

call me crazy, at 154 i would have pac as the winner, now.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Arum and Pacquiao didn't want the fight... and why should they?
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by boxing_rocks »

There have never been talks of Klitchko-Golovkin or Usyk-Golovkin even though they are all K2 fighters. Canelo is just way too big for faded Pac.
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by jockpunk »

Pac had a miserable time with margarito. Even though he beat the crap out of him, he was supposedly pissing blood for days after the fight. I don't think he wants to go through that again. Canelo is bigger than margarito so the size difference would simply be too much.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46517
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by gilgamesh »

Canelo is a hell of a lot bigger than Pacquiao for one thing. I doubt they'd be able to agree on a weight to meet at.
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by davie »

At a catch weight of 138.5lbs I'd say get it signed Manny
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by klitoris »

The Margarito fight was at a catch-weight of 150 Margarito only rehydrated to about 165.
Canelo would never be able to make 150. He struggles to make 154 and re-hydrates to a cruiserweight.
This would be suicide for Manny. If somebody ever sanctioned that fight they should be in jail.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Ricky_ »

klitoris wrote:The Margarito fight was at a catch-weight of 150 Margarito only rehydrated to about 165.
Canelo would never be able to make 150. He struggles to make 154 and re-hydrates to a cruiserweight.
This would be suicide for Manny. If somebody ever sanctioned that fight they should be in jail.

Manny would have been favorite to beat Canelo.
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Boxing Writer »

Ricky_ wrote:
klitoris wrote:The Margarito fight was at a catch-weight of 150 Margarito only rehydrated to about 165.
Canelo would never be able to make 150. He struggles to make 154 and re-hydrates to a cruiserweight.
This would be suicide for Manny. If somebody ever sanctioned that fight they should be in jail.

Manny would have been favorite to beat Canelo.
I'd definitely put my money on THAT version of Manny beating any version of Canelo at 154. But current, faded version has no chance
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Ricky_ »

Boxing Writer wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:
klitoris wrote:The Margarito fight was at a catch-weight of 150 Margarito only rehydrated to about 165.
Canelo would never be able to make 150. He struggles to make 154 and re-hydrates to a cruiserweight.
This would be suicide for Manny. If somebody ever sanctioned that fight they should be in jail.

Manny would have been favorite to beat Canelo.
I'd definitely put my money on THAT version of Manny beating any version of Canelo at 154. But current, faded version has no chance
Meh i'd still pick Pacquaio. He's faught 2 of the best Welters this year and barely lost a round. What's Canelo done? Beat Smith? Even his fight Cotto was close, Pacquaio's a far superior fighter, only the size & strength makes it interesting.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Lackeos »

-Arum and DLH don't have an easy time working together. They might be able to put aside their differences for the right fight, but their relationship is working against it.
-Alvarez is ridiculously bigger than Pacquiao, as others have mentioned. He is easily quite bigger than Margarito on fight night, and also way better than Margarito p4p. Pacquiao is small as hell, as far as welterweights go. Mayweather fought Alvarez, and props to him for that. But Alvarez is now a few pounds heavier now, and from age 23 to 26, he has improved in skill.
-This fight could potentially hand Pacquiao the final loss of his career. It should be obvious that Arum wants that loss to be against an in-house fighter if possible, and ideally a younger one. Reason being (most should understand this already) that Pacquiao's conqueror should gain an elevated profile and have more drawing power for the remainder of his career (like we have seen in the past for some of the conquerors of JCC, Whitaker, DLH, and Mosley). I suppose he will first give Horn a shot, and if Horn gets the win, then that is fortunate. But if Horn can't do it, then Arum will probably seek to match a 39 to 40-year-old Pacquiao against Vanes Martirosyan or Terence Crawford.

Btw, I certainly recognize the revenue-generating potential in Alvarez - Pacquiao, and have theorized the fight myself. But Arum needs an incentive to make this fight. If I were Arum, I would be asking for a stipulation that if Alvarez wins, then Arum gets 3ish points on Alvarez's contract. Otherwise, Arum has no reason to self-destruct his own empire and play kingmaker to DLH's.
caldo2025
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 07:37

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by caldo2025 »

Jip wrote:I mean pac beat convincingly Margarito & Clottey, one tall and one very physicly strong guy.

media always wanted floyd vs canelo or floyd vs whoever, cause ppv stardom equals entertainmant.....not!

but why werent there never serious talks of pacquiao against canelo, would do much more sense, both action packed, both world class. to be honest even now old pac would pose a lot of problems against flat footed al. yes, canelo can punch. but did he ever touched lara, who can move. would he catch pac, who has speedy gonzales kind of footspeed, even now :OhYes:

call me crazy, at 154 i would have pac as the winner, now.
That is a really good question. I don't even think that i've considered this matchup in my mind at all. Maybe it's because TR and Golden Boy were at odds for so long. It's a very interest matchup stylistically. I think that i'd take Manny because I think that he could avoid Canelo's power and pot shot him all night long. A better fight would be between Bob and Oscar over money though. They would never agree to splits.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by man »

boxing_rocks wrote:Canelo is just way too big for faded Pac.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Why were there never talks of Pacquiao-Canelo?

Post by Rexob »

Jip wrote:I mean pac beat convincingly Margarito & Clottey, one tall and one very physicly strong guy.

media always wanted floyd vs canelo or floyd vs whoever, cause ppv stardom equals entertainmant.....not!

but why werent there never serious talks of pacquiao against canelo, would do much more sense, both action packed, both world class. to be honest even now old pac would pose a lot of problems against flat footed al. yes, canelo can punch. but did he ever touched lara, who can move. would he catch pac, who has speedy gonzales kind of footspeed, even now :OhYes:

call me crazy, at 154 i would have pac as the winner, now.
You are crazy.
Post Reply