F. Warren believes the Eubanks are conning the public with this IBO crap

freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: F. Warren believes the Eubanks are conning the public with this IBO crap

Post by freddydoesdallas »

tobyh5 wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:
Who is "general public" that are not used to PPV? Are there different people who watch BBC, ITV, CH4 and CH5 than those that have Sky TV? Are they all trapped in 1988?

Is your son aware that there is now a thing called digital TV and the internet which offers a big ole choice of paid services?
Nearly 50% of the UK still only has access to terrestrial or free view tv. They will not be used to paying for TV.

I don't have a son and just because there is that option available and you and I may use it, it doesn't mean the majority of the country uses it. I have 4 brother in laws that go from my age to 10 years older who you would assume are similar to me but 3 of these don't have Sky, don't use netflix etc and only use the Internet to buy clothes and white goods.
I apologise, I did not know that many people still only have just free TV. I am surprised hugely!
No worries, it's a pretty shocking stat considering how heavy they push the sky and cable platforms
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: F. Warren believes the Eubanks are conning the public with this IBO crap

Post by Crease »

Naandrew wrote:And don't forget Mike McCallum
Mike McCallum yep, very true. I just didn't include him on my shortlist because I remembered he started off as a Light Middle and I wasn't too sure whether Mike had moved to Middleweight before Eubank left the weight division and moved up.

I should have remembered that he fought Watson before Eubank did in the same weight... But you are right, sir.
:TU:
Post Reply