Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post Reply
N2 Shape
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1384
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 19:53

Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by N2 Shape »

This is being reported as a done deal and said to be announced tomorrow for JP's WBO title.

Thoughts?
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Loki »

Parker beats him. Hughie is overated. Parker isn't the finished article but finds ways to win. I'm surprised this has been made, but Hughies lack of quality opponents and inactivity, plus PED achne will all count against him at this time.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Jip »

tough fight. dangerous fight for both. hughie looks well conditioned, parker has a problem with stamina, he gassed against fat boy. on the opposite hughie has never felt power like he is going to feel against parker. normaly hughie should win, with his reach, keeping the distance with powershots and jabs. but hughie being green, i think he gonne trade to much with parker, ultimatly ending being tkod
TooEasy12
Welterweight
Posts: 80
Joined: 10 Mar 2016, 03:21

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by TooEasy12 »

Parker by KO
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by jezzamundo »

Jip wrote:tough fight. dangerous fight for both. hughie looks well conditioned, parker has a problem with stamina, he gassed against fat boy. on the opposite hughie has never felt power like he is going to feel against parker. normaly hughie should win, with his reach, keeping the distance with powershots and jabs. but hughie being green, i think he gonne trade to much with parker, ultimatly ending being tkod
Good post, I think very similarly. I don't think Hughie has much power to bother Parker with, though. If Parker goes in aggressive like he did against Dimitrenko, I think he'll stop Hughie. If he boxes defensively like he did against Takam and Ruiz - who he gave a lot of respect to - then I could see him being outpointed.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

pretty easy stoppage for parker.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

A good fight regardless of the result, and the kind we need more of in boxing.

Props to Hughie and his team for not seasoning him for another decade before trying for a title. Even if he loses, this will be a good experience. They're doing it the right way.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by asdfjkl »

I think this fight can be a lot more competative as most people here seem to think.

Hughie is taller, has more reach, is finally in shape again and has allways been an intelligent/mature boxer, I think it will be a 50/50 fight, where Parker is better, but Hughie the more intelligent boxer.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by boxing_rocks »

Parker would have to stop Fury in order to get a win in Manchester. I doubt he can do that.
LasPalmas
Welterweight
Posts: 37
Joined: 20 Feb 2016, 07:18

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by LasPalmas »

You have to be crazy to think Peter Fury will put his SON in if he wasn't ready. I think Hughie wins by wide UD.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

FWIW I think Fury wins this one in a close competitive bout, MD after Fury is in trouble early.

Afterwards everyone screams robbery...of course.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Hughie isn't a top heavyweight.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Hughie isn't a top heavyweight.
Of course not; he'd have to beat a top heavyweight to prove that. Kind of the point, isn't it?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Hughie isn't a top heavyweight.
Of course not; he'd have to beat a top heavyweight to prove that. Kind of the point, isn't it?
OK then..Hughie doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight.

Better?
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Hughie isn't a top heavyweight.
Of course not; he'd have to beat a top heavyweight to prove that. Kind of the point, isn't it?
OK then..Hughie doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight.

Better?
You may be right, you may be wrong.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Of course not; he'd have to beat a top heavyweight to prove that. Kind of the point, isn't it?
OK then..Hughie doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight.

Better?
You may be right, you may be wrong.
Thanks for that insight
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
OK then..Hughie doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight.

Better?
You may be right, you may be wrong.
Thanks for that insight
:TU:

You're welcome.

On that note Charles Martin doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight either...and yet he "won" a title. There's a lot of room in the heavyweight division right now.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
You may be right, you may be wrong.
Thanks for that insight
:TU:

You're welcome.

On that note Charles Martin doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight either...and yet he "won" a title. There's a lot of room in the heavyweight division right now.
Charles Martin was never a top heavyweight and winning a paper title doesn't automatically make you one.

Yes, there is a lot of flab in the heavyweight division, which means it makes no sense to talk about 'top heavyweights' in relative terms, only absolute.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by punchoutsb »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Thanks for that insight
:TU:

You're welcome.

On that note Charles Martin doesn't have what it takes to be a top heavyweight either...and yet he "won" a title. There's a lot of room in the heavyweight division right now.
Charles Martin was never a top heavyweight and winning a paper title doesn't automatically make you one.

Yes, there is a lot of flab in the heavyweight division, which means it makes no sense to talk about 'top heavyweights' in relative terms, only absolute.
It makes no sense at all really. There is one proven elite heavyweight in this division and he's over 40 and on the down side. Then there's Tyson Fury...then everybody else. Joshua is unproven, Wilder is unproven, Otiz is unproven, Parker is unproven, Miller is unproven, Washington is unproven, Hughie is unproven AND the youngest with the most time to develop. It's far too soon to count him out when we have no idea how good anyone at the top really is.
Last edited by punchoutsb on 19 Jan 2017, 14:43, edited 1 time in total.
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by ValMar »

boxing_rocks wrote:Parker would have to stop Fury in order to get a win in Manchester. I doubt he can do that.
Very good post !
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by asdfjkl »

Hughie showed a better performance at the age of 19 against Rudenko, then Lucas Browne in his own prime.
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Great fight for Parker he beats Hughie any day it will probably be in the UK so I think team Parker will be very motivated for a late stoppage to make sure of the victory Joe wins in 11 while well ahead on the card's. :TU:
Rob3_142
Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by Rob3_142 »

It's hard to tell how this would go, as it's hard to determine where Hughie is. I think we have found a lot out about Parker in the last 18 months, and perhaps he still has a long way to go in his development, but he now has had enough of the right fights to win this fight. There's no chance that this fight doesn't go 12 rounds, as I'm not convinced either has the tools to knock the other out.

I fancy it to be a close UD/SD for Parker.
rockyefc
Welterweight
Posts: 5
Joined: 03 Mar 2016, 08:24

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by rockyefc »

Parkers defining wins against Takam, Ruiz and Dimitrenko show that he has potential and at age 24 he can only get better. Its well known that heavyweights do not reach physical maturity until their late twenties/early thirties so his natural 'man strength' will improve as he gets older. Whilst he has won the WBO title with his current trainer, I feel that he would benefit now from a change to a new guy who can improve his defence but maintain his aggression. I like Parker and even now I think he beats Hughie...
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Parker/H Fury April in Manchester

Post by BitPlayer »

It's a decent fight, shouldn't be world title level, but still a decent fight.
Post Reply