Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: WWANKGATE........

Post by magwitch »

What’s all this? Tell you what...his social media is very prolific. It’s full of little videos of him doing bagwork, floor to ceiling ball....even swimming the other week. All 10 seconds long, strangely......
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: WWANKGATE........

Post by magwitch »

Great vids for any couch potatoes or beginner/ improvers. Even for kids - altho I am firmly against kids having mobiles or any of that nasty social media crap.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Tuan_jim has heroically braved the video on behalf of those who need to know the contents. It's 10 minutes of Khan's face, and then he quickly rubs one out. Not the best porno I have ever seen, but it did get me there.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by MightyWarrior »

Stevieb8006 wrote:Another one? He's not the brightest is he? I'm not fussed tho. man has a wank, hardly big news. He does LOADS for charity that they don't write about and he doesnt discuss so he's a good egg in my book
Plus he thought he was actually wanking for charity.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by bripez »

The timing of this seems a little odd - the video is a few year old but is now released just a few weeks after him missus and family have a very public row.

Maybe his missus is getting her ducks in a row to divorce and rinse him?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17104
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Why is a big deal? He wanked. We all do it.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by crusader »

I have never filmed myself wanking on Skype
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12050
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Taansend »

crusader wrote:I have never filmed myself wanking on Skype
You haven't lived :lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23226
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by handsofstone »

Tuan_Jim wrote:Tuan_jim has heroically braved the video on behalf of those who need to know the contents. It's 10 minutes of Khan's face, and then he quickly rubs one out. Not the best porno I have ever seen, but it did get me there.
:lol:
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by bripez »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Why is a big deal? He wanked. We all do it.
These days all "celebs" try to build a public profile via social media (I guess with the aim of raising both their profile and their bank balance) - eg. Khan is a humble, charitable, religious family man, and chooses to prove this by continuing to knock one out on youtube.

An unusual strategy, although it does seem to have the effect of getting his face (and cock) in the papers.
darkstar81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by darkstar81 »

Honesty thought this was a joke :OhYes:
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Tarkus »

Stevieb8006 wrote:Another one? He's not the brightest is he? I'm not fussed tho. man has a wank, hardly big news. He does LOADS for charity that they don't write about and he doesnt discuss so he's a good egg in my book
Yes, he is a pride of wankistan.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by coneye »

Poor dumb fornicator .. He just is'nt smart is he , has if a normal person would'nt think ,, heh i'm doing this on skype, maybee they'll tape it , Now it all comes out again followed by the I was abused by Khans parents , and all he done was wanked off upstairs while i was pregnant ,, honestly judge thats worth at least 3/4 of his wealth for what i went through
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by magwitch »

crusader wrote:Vid got leaked of him jacking off
Again? Is this the thing from a few year ago? He just needs a brown paper bag with two holes cut out..............for his head!
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Mimmy »

just seen it, dirty bugger. And its him, stunning like a young Burt Reynalds
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by boxingknockout »

Is it correct that length is decent, but girth not so impressive but has a large Bellend is a decent summary? So says my gay friend :lol: :lol: :lol:
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by coneye »

mimmy123 wrote:just seen it, dirty bugger. And its him, stunning like a young Burt Reynalds
My Oh MY ,, Why would you watch it Lol ,
Gnome
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 13 Nov 2010, 18:54

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Gnome »

This thread is absolute gold!

Well done lads. :salut:
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by boxingknockout »

Gnome wrote:This thread is absolute gold!

Well done lads. :salut:
Apparently it's like a pencil, with a plum on the end. I'm told. By a gay friend.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Mimmy »

boxingknockout wrote:Is it correct that length is decent, but girth not so impressive but has a large Bellend is a decent summary? So says my gay friend :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think you have summed it up correctly
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Mimmy »

coneye wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:just seen it, dirty bugger. And its him, stunning like a young Burt Reynalds
My Oh MY ,, Why would you watch it Lol ,
Why wouldnt I watch it?
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by coneye »

mimmy123 wrote:
coneye wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:just seen it, dirty bugger. And its him, stunning like a young Burt Reynalds
My Oh MY ,, Why would you watch it Lol ,
Why wouldnt I watch it?
Can't really think of an answer for that one ,, Personaly i'd rather watch his wife rub herself up
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23226
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by handsofstone »

boxingknockout wrote:
Gnome wrote:This thread is absolute gold!

Well done lads. :salut:
Apparently it's like a pencil, with a plum on the end. I'm told. By a gay friend.
:lol:
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by Mimmy »

coneye wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:
coneye wrote:
My Oh MY ,, Why would you watch it Lol ,
Why wouldnt I watch it?
Can't really think of an answer for that one ,, Personaly i'd rather watch his wife rub herself up
So would I fella :clap: but surely you dont close your eyes when you watch a bluey when the blokes cock is shown?
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Is there some legal injunction on here banning all Khan tape discussions??

Post by ALI »

mimmy123 wrote:
chiggsy wrote:To qoute dillion from the 1987 film predator "that's a real nasty habbit you got there". :o

We all like a good old fashioned tug but why does he feel the need to film himself doing it?

Isn't this the 3rd time he's been gripped pulling pud on skype?
I understand him wanking so what,.
Actually, i'm struggling with it. He has a young fit wife who he just wed, and had only been with a couple of years prior. There should be no need for wanking so early in the relationship unless he is away from her for a few days or more. She was down stairs, he should have had her over the couch, not knocking one out to some bimbo on skype.
Post Reply