The Khan-dashians

Post Reply
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

The Khan-dashians

Post by SAPFO »

It seems Khan is winding down the family boxing business by making redundancies, and the wife is all but saying the family are all inbreds. Haroon also reckons Mrs Khan looks like Michael Jackson. Khan & Mrs were also on This Morning.

Khan-dashians

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... claim.html
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Covfefe »

So?
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

Haroon Khan celebrated his marriage to wife Arifa in front of 1,000 guests in a lavish bash at Bolton FC's Macron Stadium on Saturday night.
Only drew 1,000 in a 32,000 seat stadium? The Khans really can't draw for siht these days.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Haroon Khan celebrated his marriage to wife Arifa in front of 1,000 guests in a lavish bash at Bolton FC's Macron Stadium on Saturday night.
Only drew 1,000 in a 32,000 seat stadium? The Khans really can't draw for siht these days.
Clearly, they overestimated the appeal of the secondary market and stubhub couldn't shift them
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Bricks »

Brilliant thread title.

I have been calling them this since all this fabricated crrap started.....its so clear since his spanking from canelo that khan knows his career is winding down....a brook fight will be another ko loss and the end of his delusions as a top tier fighter..........so he and his manipulative wife are angling to become reality show stars and keep their beloved celebrity and fame as the khandashians.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26466
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by banjo »

I think it's very unfair to compare the Khan's to the Kardashians, unfair to the Kardashians that is.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by ILikeBeer »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:So?
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by bripez »

ILikeBeer wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:So?
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10941
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by ILikeBeer »

bripez wrote:
ILikeBeer wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:So?
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
A thousand apologies.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Covfefe »

bripez wrote:
ILikeBeer wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:So?
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
You only reply to things you agree with do you?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by bripez »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
bripez wrote:
ILikeBeer wrote:
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
You only reply to things you agree with do you?
Clearly not, otherwise I would not have commented !

However, I do try to give an alternative viewpoint.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by bripez »

ILikeBeer wrote:
bripez wrote:
ILikeBeer wrote:
I thought this. Surely we watch boxing for the fights? I have no interest in his family life.

If we wanted to watch people arguing with their families, we'd watch Jeremy Kyle or Eastenders.
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
A thousand apologies.
No worries mate - a thousand apologies accepted! :TU:
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Covfefe »

bripez wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
bripez wrote:
Yet you both commented on this thread? - why not just move on to another thread?
You only reply to things you agree with do you?
Clearly not, otherwise I would not have commented !

However, I do try to give an alternative viewpoint.
I don't think vacuous tabloid nonsense deserves an alternative viewpoint.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by bripez »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
bripez wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
You only reply to things you agree with do you?
Clearly not, otherwise I would not have commented !

However, I do try to give an alternative viewpoint.
I don't think vacuous tabloid nonsense deserves an alternative viewpoint.
Fair enough, that is your viewpoint and much more informative than simply posting "so?"
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by Covfefe »

bripez wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
bripez wrote:
Clearly not, otherwise I would not have commented !

However, I do try to give an alternative viewpoint.
I don't think vacuous tabloid nonsense deserves an alternative viewpoint.
Fair enough, that is your viewpoint and much more informative than simply posting "so?"
So?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by bripez »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
bripez wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:
I don't think vacuous tabloid nonsense deserves an alternative viewpoint.
Fair enough, that is your viewpoint and much more informative than simply posting "so?"
So?
Exactly.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47072
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: The Khan-dashians

Post by gilgamesh »

So this is Amir Khan now? No more fights He just jacks off in front of a camera and his wife says crazy sh*t....why does he matter anymore?
Post Reply